Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)

2018-06-02 Thread Graham Inggs
On 3 June 2018 at 00:29, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 11:22:07PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> > I found this while rebuilding r-cran-cummerbund (level 13) in Ubuntu, >> > so anything else missing is a leaf package (or set of leaf packages, I >> > guess). >> >> Do you n

Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)

2018-06-02 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 02/06/18 15:48, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 1 June 2018 at 21:45, Graham Inggs wrote: >> On 1 June 2018 at 21:43, Graham Inggs wrote: >>> r-cran-fastica also seems to be missing r-api-3.4 so doesn't appear on >>> the tracker, but needs a rebuild. >> >> Sorry, my mistake, please ignore. > > OK, t

Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)

2018-06-02 Thread Graham Inggs
On 1 June 2018 at 21:45, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 1 June 2018 at 21:43, Graham Inggs wrote: >> r-cran-fastica also seems to be missing r-api-3.4 so doesn't appear on >> the tracker, but needs a rebuild. > > Sorry, my mistake, please ignore. OK, this time I'm pretty sure r-cran-fastcluster is not

Bug#896667: It is safe to assume that source only uploads will build against the r-api-3.5? (Was: Bug#896667: transition: r-base-3.5)

2018-06-02 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 1 June 2018 at 18:35, Graham Inggs wrote: | On 01/06/2018 17:19, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > This is now taken care of: dbi_1.0.0-2 was just uploaded | | Thanks Dirk! | | Another weirdness I have come across in Ubuntu today is rebuilds of | r-cran-expm and r-cran-mlmrev fail with the follo

Re: Workflow for handling security issues in testing

2018-06-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 11:00:20AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 6/1/18 9:17 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:36:27PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > >> ... > >> I don't think most users of testing realize that > >> they also need to include stable-backports in sources.list t

Re: Workflow for handling security issues in testing

2018-06-02 Thread Philipp Kern
On 6/1/18 9:17 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:36:27PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> ... >> I don't think most users of testing realize that >> they also need to include stable-backports in sources.list to get >> security fixes. >> ... > > No, this wouldn't get them all secu

Bug#894713: stretch-pu: apache2/2.4.25-3+deb9u5

2018-06-02 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Sunday, 20 May 2018 18:32:55 CEST Stefan Fritsch wrote: > As I don't see any other way to fix the open issues, I would still like to > go ahead. But I will prepare a new package/diff with a NEWS.Debian entry > that informs about this change. The new debdiff is attached. the NEWS part is also be