Bug#885649: transition: src:qscintilla2

2018-01-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, January 02, 2018 10:58:22 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 28/12/17 22:11, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > I've uploaded th

Bug#885649: transition: src:qscintilla2

2018-01-02 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 28/12/17 22:11, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > I've uploaded the new qscintilla2 to experimental and tested all the reverse- > build-depends. Due to up

Processed: Re: Bug#885649: transition: src:qscintilla2

2018-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #885649 [release.debian.org] transition: src:qscintilla2 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 885649: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885649 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#885601: marked as done (nmu: ossim_2.2.0-1)

2018-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 2 Jan 2018 22:51:24 +0100 with message-id <820426e6-e3d8-eba4-07c6-b0f04791b...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#885601: nmu: ossim_2.2.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #885601, regarding nmu: ossim_2.2.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Processed: Re: Bug#886182: transition: glibc 2.26

2018-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #886182 [release.debian.org] transition: glibc 2.26 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 886182: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886182 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#886182: transition: glibc 2.26

2018-01-02 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 02/01/18 22:37, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear release team, > > I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.26. It is available in > experim

Bug#886182: transition: glibc 2.26

2018-01-02 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear release team, I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.26. It is available in experimental for one month and a half, and there is no known regression. It has been built suc

Bug#871469: marked as done (transition: ocaml)

2018-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 2 Jan 2018 22:20:43 +0100 with message-id <81ba2309-e1c3-69f1-2aab-9a71b9136...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#871469: transition: ocaml has caused the Debian Bug report #871469, regarding transition: ocaml to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Re: udeb uninstallability trend: worse (+20/-0)

2018-01-02 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Don Armstrong (2018-01-01): > OK. Found the issue. Apparently, packages in the */debian-installer > components were being skipped when the BTS was figuring out what was > in which distribution. I've fixed that now, and the versions > database is being updated with that information. > > The underl

Bug#886146: stretch-pu: package sqlcipher/3.2.0-2+deb9u1

2018-01-02 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Tags: stretch Severity: normal Hello, I request an update to fix segfaults for sqlcipher, due to wrong/incomplete openssl patch summary of the changes is here (and debdiff attached) +sqlcipher (3.2.0-2+deb9u1