In data sabato 9 dicembre 2017 23:48:10 CET, Pino Toscano ha scritto:
> Uploaded libkf5kipi, marble and libkf5kgeomap few hours ago, and all of
> them already built everywhere.
Can you please rebuild also digikam in experimental?
Thanks,
--
Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digi
Processing control commands:
> block 883622 by -1
Bug #883622 [release.debian.org] transition: analitza 17.08
883622 was not blocked by any bugs.
883622 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 883622: 884273
--
883622: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883622
884273:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu cnrun_2.1.0-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against libgsl23."
libgsl2 is gone (at least on the release architectures).
Andreas
Hello,
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libupnp currently claims:
Updating libupnp fixes old bugs: ...
. I had to ask in #debian-mentors what an "old bug" is. Now I know that
I wonder if britney could be updated to say instead something like:
Updating libupnp fixes bugs in testing
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch sid
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu 2 rpy_1.0.3-30 . ANY . stretch . -m "Rebuild against r-base 3.3"
nmu 3 rpy_1.0.3-30 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against r-base 3.4"
Hi,
for fixing #884134 binNMUs f
On 09/12/17 23:46, Pino Toscano wrote:
> In data venerdì 8 dicembre 2017 19:52:13 CET, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha
> scritto:
>> On 05/12/17 21:57, Pino Toscano wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: transition
>>>
>
6 matches
Mail list logo