On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 22:05:41 +0200 Yavor Doganov wrote:
> clone 879738 -1
> reassign -1 gnustep-gui-runtime/0.25.0-4
> retitle -1 gnustep-gui-runtime: Depends on gnustep-back0.25
> severity -1 serious
> thanks
>
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 30/10/17 17:19, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > > 1.25
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 879738 with 880460
Bug #879738 [release.debian.org] transition: gnustep-base
879738 was not blocked by any bugs.
879738 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 879738: 880460
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 880460 gnustep-gui-runtime 0.25.0-4
Bug #880460 [release.debian.org] gnustep-gui-runtime: Depends on
gnustep-back0.25
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'gnustep-gui-runtime'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of
clone 879738 -1
reassign -1 gnustep-gui-runtime/0.25.0-4
retitle -1 gnustep-gui-runtime: Depends on gnustep-back0.25
severity -1 serious
thanks
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 30/10/17 17:19, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > 1.25.0-2 is built and installed on all arches; please schedule the
> > binNMUs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 879738 -1
Bug #879738 [release.debian.org] transition: gnustep-base
Bug 879738 cloned as bug 880460
> reassign -1 gnustep-gui-runtime/0.25.0-4
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> retitle -1 gnustep-gui-runtime: Depends on gn
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2017 14:04:29 -0500
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#880453: nmu: castle-game-engine_6.2+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #880453,
regarding nmu: castle-game-engine_6.2+dfsg1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2017 14:04:04 -0500
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#880452: nmu: lazarus_1.8.0~rc5+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #880452,
regarding nmu: lazarus_1.8.0~rc5+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 30/10/17 15:21, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libva.html
> Control: block -1
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #880355 [release.debian.org] transition: libva
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
880355: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=880355
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Yesterday I uploaded a new upstream version of fpc. Now castle-game-engine
needs to be rebuild to pick up the new fpc-abi-3.0.4.
nmu castle-g
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I uploaded a new upstream version of fpc yesterday. Now lazarus needs to be
rebuild to pick up the new fpc-abi-3.0.4.
nmu lazarus_1.8.0~rc5+d
Processing changes file: getmail4_4.53.0-2+deb9u1_amd64.changes
REJECT
On 2017-10-31 14:40, Osamu Aoki wrote:
I just uploaded to the stable-proposed-upload.
Unfortunately you used an inappropriate version number, so I've flagged
the package for rejection.
Currently unstable has version 4.53.0-2. The version you used -
4.53.0-2+deb9u1 is *higher* than the unsta
On 30/10/17 17:19, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:15:53 +0300,
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 25/10/17 10:28, Yavor Doganov wrote:
>>> We would like to carry out a gnustep-base transition:
>>> libgnustep-base1.24 -> libgnustep-base1.25
>
>> Please go ahead.
>
> 1.25.0-2 is b
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:46:11 -0500
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#880392: nmu: ants_2.2.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #880392,
regarding nmu: ants_2.2.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:46:40 -0500
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#880376: nmu: eeshow_0.git20161102-1 kate_4:17.08.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #880376,
regarding nmu: eeshow_0.git20161102-1 kate_4:17.08.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
On 31/10/17 01:53, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Followup-For: Bug #879787
>
> The binNMUs for experimental:
>
> nmu akonadi_4:17.08.0-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against
> qtbase-abi-5-9-2."
> nmu qtspeech-opensource-src_5.9.1-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild
> against qtbase-abi-5-9-
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
I just uploaded to the stable-proposed-upload.
This stable package was based on 4.53.0 which was released right before
the Stretch release. Since then, upstream found a regression
On 2017-10-31 14:48, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
"ncl" is involved in the current netcdf (and upcoming hdf5)
transition(s).
Its failed to build on mips64el (hardware issue on build machine?) but
also on the kfreebsd, hurd, hppa archs:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ncl
I've a fi
Hi,
"ncl" is involved in the current netcdf (and upcoming hdf5) transition(s).
Its failed to build on mips64el (hardware issue on build machine?) but
also on the kfreebsd, hurd, hppa archs:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ncl
I've a fix for the kfreebsd, hurd FTBFS and also I thi
Just following up this request to note that this change has now
migrated to testing and also been acked by the maintainer:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2017/10/msg00340.html
--
Phil Morrell (emorrp1)
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Hi folks,
>
> Now that casulana is set up and knows how to build installation images,
> Steve gave me a green light for a new alpha release. We've been having
> a few issues on dillon (see previous mails on debian-boot@), but maybe
> I'm not going to bl
Hi folks,
Now that casulana is set up and knows how to build installation images,
Steve gave me a green light for a new alpha release. We've been having
a few issues on dillon (see previous mails on debian-boot@), but maybe
I'm not going to block the release on fixing those.
I'll try and find som
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu ants_2.2.0-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against
libinsighttoolkit4.12."
That transition was finished in sid long ago.
Andreas
24 matches
Mail list logo
