Dirk Eddelbuettel:
>
> On 10 September 2017 at 16:15, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]> |
> Next April they will have r-api-4.
Ok. If the r-api-4 bump in April works like I think it does, then that
will also resolve this problem as a side-effect. So in worst case, we
can do a regular transition of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 871444
Bug #871444 {Done: James McCoy } [release.debian.org]
transition: msgpack-c
Bug 871444 is already marked as done; not doing anything.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
871444: https://b
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/vdr.html
Bug #875300 [release.debian.org] transition: vdr
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/vdr.html'.
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #875300 [release.debian.org] transition
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/vdr.html
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 10/09/17 15:44, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> looks like all the r
On 09.09.2017 15:12, Julien Cristau wrote:
Hi,
>> +ntp (1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-3+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium
> Seems ok, feel free to upload.
Uploaded and accepted.
Bernhard
Processing control commands:
> block 871056 by -1
Bug #871056 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
871056 was blocked by: 858992 828477 859841 858436 851087 873574 859721 828413
859716 828557 851080 867140 859145 859556 851070 850890 858931 851084 859146
859542 859053 870778 828572 851094 85
Hi,
Sorry to disturb but as this package contains critical security fixes and
because it has already been uploaded to jessie-bpo could you please upload
it to stable-updates before the point release ?
Issue for jessie-bpo :
https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2017/09/msg9.html
Thanks
On 10 September 2017 at 16:15, Niels Thykier wrote:
| To be perfectly, honest, I would prefer if you did a proper ABI-like
| transition over the Breaks. At this scale, Breaks seems too fragile and
| too likely for people to get wrong.
I *am* -- all packages (currently) get have r-api-3:
edd@b
Dirk Eddelbuettel:
>
> On 10 September 2017 at 11:20, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> | On 09/09/17 13:48, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | >
> | > On 9 September 2017 at 06:44, Niels Thykier wrote:
> | > | Thanks to Sébastien and Andreas for explaining the issue.
> | >
> | > Well, was it "explained
On 10 September 2017 at 11:20, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| On 09/09/17 13:48, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 9 September 2017 at 06:44, Niels Thykier wrote:
| > | Thanks to Sébastien and Andreas for explaining the issue.
| >
| > Well, was it "explained" ? They both raised and stressed
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2017 16:49:45 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#874124: armel binNMUs for the #866354 ABI change
has caused the Debian Bug report #874124,
regarding armel binNMUs for the #866354 ABI change
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2017 16:37:45 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#862189: transition: hunspell
has caused the Debian Bug report #862189,
regarding transition: hunspell
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
looks like all the remaining vdr plugins need to be rebuilt for the
virtual abi bump, too.
For whatever reason they didn't show up yesterday (#874732) ...
Andreas
Ben file:
title
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2017 12:54:03 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: tome needs a rebuild using GCC 7
has caused the Debian Bug report #872297,
regarding nmu: tome_2.4~0.git.2015.12.29-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2017 11:22:45 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#874570: nmu: php-facedetect_1.1.0+git20160406-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #874570,
regarding nmu: php-facedetect_1.1.0+git20160406-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/php7.1.html
Bug #872998 [release.debian.org] transition: PHP 7.0 to 7.1
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/php7.1.html'.
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #872998 [release.debia
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2017 11:23:23 +0200
with message-id <6d4696d6-da75-7ec7-4ccb-bf1a4b41a...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#874732: nmu: vdr-plugin-xine_0.9.4-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #874732,
regarding nmu: vdr-plugin-xine_0.9.4-14
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/php7.1.html
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 23/08/17 15:18, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> this is request for PH
On 09/09/17 13:48, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 9 September 2017 at 06:44, Niels Thykier wrote:
> | Thanks to Sébastien and Andreas for explaining the issue.
>
> Well, was it "explained" ? They both raised and stressed a hypothetical
> issue: That "there might be siutations where a partial up
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 06:57:12 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> In data lunedì 10 luglio 2017 09:18:11 CEST, Julien Cristau ha scritto:
> > On 07/10/2017 08:29 AM, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > can you please block kdevplatform/5.1.1-1 from entering testing
> > > tonight?
> > > kdevelop
On 09/09/2017 03:16 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 10:56:16 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> On 08/06/2017 07:12 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>>> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 08:45:57PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>
21 matches
Mail list logo
