On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 13:26:30 +0800 Drew Parsons
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
Sorry, that debdiff was unclean.
Here is the clean debdiff:
diff -Nru mpi4py-2.0.0/debian/changelog mpi4py-2.0.0/debian/chang
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mpi4py
mpi4py in testing (2.0.0-2) FTBFS due to errors in some tests (release
critical bug #856349)
.
2.0.0-2.1 fixes the FTBFS by treating test errors as warnings.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu why_2.36-5 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against frama-c-base (=
20161101+silicon+dfsg-5)"
why seems to have a very strict dependency on frama-c-base :-(
libwhy-coq/amd64 unsatisfiabl
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gnome-shell. It has been in unstable for 10 days
without relevant-looking bug reports.
The relevant hint: unblock gnome-shell/3.22.3-2
This version drops the depende
* Niels Thykier:
>> * Add 33_sshcrypto_DES.patch
>> Replacing all des_ methods and structs with DES_ equivalents.
>> Already implemented in OpenBSD
>
> Why is this done? The patch does not explain why this is a good idea (I
> assume it is, but I am missing the "why").
Functions and typ
Hi Ivo,
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 09:36:30PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 08:30:48PM +0100, Carsten Leonhardt wrote:
>> > Please unblock package bacula
>> >
>> > This fixes a bug that makes it impossible to successful
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
Since net-tools is not an essential package anymore, cloud-init must
depend on it otherwise, a cloud image may simply fail to boot without
fixing the image geneartion too
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 08:57:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Alexandre Viau:
> >>> That was a bad understanding of the QA page from my part [1]. Actually
> >>> can somebody explain why 1.1.1 is in the "testing" column?
> >> Becuase you didn't fix the build failure of 1.1.1+dfsg1-1 and
> >> 1.1.
Alexandre Viau:
>>> That was a bad understanding of the QA page from my part [1]. Actually
>>> can somebody explain why 1.1.1 is in the "testing" column?
>> Becuase you didn't fix the build failure of 1.1.1+dfsg1-1 and
>> 1.1.1+dfsg1-2 quickly enough, like, in December when they happened, and
>> in
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 21:35:39 +0100 Marcos Fouces wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package dsniff in order to fix its five grave bugs
>
> Dear release team,
>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #857577 [release.debian.org] unblock: dsniff/2.4b1+debian-24
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
857577: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857577
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:51:07 -0400
with message-id <29b43186-88e5-b83f-82ba-fc83452b3...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#857574: 1.1.1 isn't in Debian yet.
has caused the Debian Bug report #857574,
regarding unblock: influxdb/1.1.1+dfsg1-4
to be marked as done.
This means that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dsniff in order to fix its five grave bugs
Dear release team,
dsniff is to be removed from testing due to five grave bugs
affecting several of its tools:
#715646 [G
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 04:17:17PM -0400, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> Hello,
Please don't break the threading like you did with this email.
> I have noticed that 1.1.1 isn't in Debian yet.
It is?
> That was a bad understanding of the QA page from my part [1]. Actually
> can somebody explain why 1.1
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2017 20:25:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#857575: unblock: redmine/3.3.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #857575,
regarding unblock: redmine/3.3.1-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Hello,
I have noticed that 1.1.1 isn't in Debian yet.
That was a bad understanding of the QA page from my part [1]. Actually
can somebody explain why 1.1.1 is in the "testing" column?
Anyways, can we still get it unblocked? It contains various fixes that
would be a great addition for Stretch.
I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package redmine
This version has 2 translation updates, and a change to improve the
robustness of a recently-added autopkgtest.
a debdiff is attached. changelog:
redmine
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock influxdb 1.1.1+dfsg1-4. If fixes #850282 which caused
occasional FTBFS.
The tests were failing due to an unstable test which was disabled.
I have attached the debdiff to thi
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2017 19:32:26 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock cinnamon-screensaver
has caused the Debian Bug report #857543,
regarding unblock: cinnamon-screensaver/3.2.13-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Ohai,
I would like to upload thinkfan/0.9.3-2 for Stretch, fixing two bugs:
#758579 (grave) Post Installation, Start Script fails to Initialize
#850514 (important) daemon args (/etc/defau
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 857118 normal
Bug #857118 [release.debian.org] unblock: xfce4-equake-plugin/1.3.8-1
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
857118: http://bugs.debian.org/c
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I've uploaded flatpak's new upstream bug fix release 0.8.4 to
experimental for now, but I'd like it to be considered for stretch.
If necessary I'll talk to upstream about whether they ca
Hi!
On 2017-03-12 15:52, Niels Thykier wrote:
Ok with me - please remove the moreinfo flag once the upload has been
processed and built on all relevant release architectures.
Ok.
One note though:
+ dh_install ../cinnamon-screensaver-dialog [...]
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2017 17:27:59 +0100
with message-id <20170312162758.vvl4kx3xgxexv...@mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#857475: unblock: pbuilder/0.228.6 (pre-approval)
has caused the Debian Bug report #857475,
regarding unblock: pbuilder/0.228.6 (pre-approval)
to be marked as don
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2017 16:02:00 +
with message-id <78e9d487-27b1-e1ee-34ca-204aba01e...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#857559: unblock: brltty/5.4-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #857559,
regarding unblock: brltty/5.4-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Hello,
Cyril Brulebois, on dim. 12 mars 2017 16:22:58 +0100, wrote:
> Assuming Samuel has already tested it in d-i, or will fix any issues
> found there, fine with me.
I have just tested it, the fix works there too.
Samuel
Michael Biebl:
> Hi Florian, hi release team
>
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:00:22 +0100 Florian Schlichting
> wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 +patch
>>
>> Hi Michael, Berlin BSP here.
>>
>> Given that it's too late now to get a mallard-rng package into Stretch,
>> I suggest to ship the mallard-1.0.rng fil
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:35:00 +
with message-id <9075e956-ae0c-f9f2-c254-895b9d67f...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#857097: unblock: texlive-base/2016.20170123-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #857097,
regarding unblock: texlive-base/2016.20170123-5
to be marked as done
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:30:00 +
with message-id <4a0b472e-fdd6-b8fd-53b5-c26ff489b...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#856716: unblock: systemtap/3.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #856716,
regarding unblock: systemtap/3.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:24:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#857548: unblock: espeak-ng/1.49.0+dfsg-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #857548,
regarding unblock: espeak-ng/1.49.0+dfsg-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Niels Thykier (2017-03-12):
> Samuel Thibault:
> > In Bug#857523, Andreas Beckmann reported a broken symlink in the
> > libespeak-ng-libespeak1 package
> >
> > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libespeak.so.1 -> libespeak-ng.so.1
> >
> > which is due to a wrong dependency: espeak-ng-data instead of
> >
Niels Thykier (2017-03-12):
> Samuel Thibault:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > As documented in Bug#857558, the blind users which use Vario Ultra
> > devices (which are becoming mor
Samuel Thibault:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hello,
>
> As documented in Bug#857558, the blind users which use Vario Ultra
> devices (which are becoming more and more popular) report that if they
> type to
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:10:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#857400: unblock: python-bleach/2.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #857400,
regarding unblock: python-bleach/2.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
As documented in Bug#857558, the blind users which use Vario Ultra
devices (which are becoming more and more popular) report that if they
type too fast, brltty restarts its driver, t
Samuel Thibault:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hello,
>
> In Bug#857523, Andreas Beckmann reported a broken symlink in the
> libespeak-ng-libespeak1 package
>
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libespeak.so.1 -> l
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Bug #857543 [release.debian.org] unblock: cinnamon-screensaver/3.2.13-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed.
--
857543: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857543
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Margarita Manterola:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package cinnamon-screensaver, in order to fix important bug:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2017 14:43:00 +
with message-id <87c42440-2de0-61e4-e0ce-e8c7fe11f...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#857542: unblock: libguestfs/1.34.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #857542,
regarding unblock: libguestfs/1.34.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
In Bug#857523, Andreas Beckmann reported a broken symlink in the
libespeak-ng-libespeak1 package
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libespeak.so.1 -> libespeak-ng.so.1
which is due to a wro
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package cinnamon-screensaver, in order to fix important bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=853064
Version 3.2 of the cinnamon-screensaver is a complete re
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
please allow libguestfs 1.34.6-1 into testing. This is a new upstream
sub-version that only introduces bugfixes and does not break existing
APIs.
A filtered debdiff is a
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2017 12:26:25 +0100
with message-id <2e077f00-a6e8-1dd6-a09e-83c4e5efb...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#857539: unblock: systemd/231-19
has caused the Debian Bug report #857539,
regarding unblock: systemd/231-19
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2017 11:42:31 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock mustache-d
has caused the Debian Bug report #856679,
regarding unblock: mustache-d/0.1.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2017 11:39:33 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock ldc
has caused the Debian Bug report #856678,
regarding unblock: ldc/1:1.1.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2017-03-12):
> On 12/03/17 10:47, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > The current systemd in unstable (232-19) fixes a bunch of bugs, mostly in
> > resolved (which we don't enable by default), but also in bits which do run
> > by
> > default. Also some testing improvements.
> >
> > Th
On 12/03/17 10:47, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hello release team,
>
> The current systemd in unstable (232-19) fixes a bunch of bugs, mostly in
> resolved (which we don't enable by default), but also in b
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2017 11:32:18 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#856433: unblock: influxdb-python/3.0.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #856433,
regarding unblock: influxdb-python/3.0.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:43:02PM +0100, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
[...]
> > > On 26/02/17 18:51, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > > > Control: tag -1 confirmed moreinfo
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > You should close the bug in your changelog, and you do not ment
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello release team,
The current systemd in unstable (232-19) fixes a bunch of bugs, mostly in
resolved (which we don't enable by default), but also in bits which do run by
default. Also some testing improve
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 09:36:30PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 08:30:48PM +0100, Carsten Leonhardt wrote:
> > Please unblock package bacula
> >
> > This fixes a bug that makes it impossible to successfully pass the
>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #856223 [release.debian.org] unblock: profanity/0.4.7-1.1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
856223: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856223
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2017 09:37:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#857506: unblock: mbrola/3.01h+2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #857506,
regarding unblock: mbrola/3.01h+2-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2017 09:35:00 +
with message-id <7bbc1de1-258f-bc42-73e3-1ef176d6e...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#857489: unblock: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/1:1.0.13-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #857489,
regarding unblock: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/1:1.0.13-2
to
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Bug #857475 [release.debian.org] unblock: pbuilder/0.228.6 (pre-approval)
Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed.
--
857475: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857475
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Mattia Rizzolo:
> package: release.debian.org
> user: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> usertags: unblock
> x-debbugs-cc: pbuilder-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> We pbuilder maintainers would like to fix #841935 for good, so James did
> some great wor
Marcos Fouces:
> Dear release team,
>
> I would like to include in stretch the next release of dsniff (dsniff
> (2.4b1+debian-24, currently: dsniff (2.4b1+debian-23)
>
> As you can see, it fixes five grave bugs. The patches i applied are from
> Fedora and OpenBSD and are released time ago in thei
Dear release team,
I would like to include in stretch the next release of dsniff (dsniff
(2.4b1+debian-24, currently: dsniff (2.4b1+debian-23)
As you can see, it fixes five grave bugs. The patches i applied are from
Fedora and OpenBSD and are released time ago in their respective distros.
T
58 matches
Mail list logo
