[recipient list trimmed and sent to the release.d.o bug rather than the
e2fsprogs one]
On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 19:56 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 12:31 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
[...]
> > Agreed, that seems to be the best way to handle things. So that means
> > we w
Dear Release Managers:
If Release Policy wording is not going to be clarified in any way, that's ok.
Let's assume, for example [1, 2], that I found a package which FTBFS
more than 90% of the time on single-CPU machines, and rarely on
buildd.debian.org.
I do think that such bugs should still be s
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, Florian Schlichting wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:04:34PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > So, if establishing a threshold is the only way to achieve that for
> > example Bug #843038 in "elki" is upgraded to serious again, so be it,
> > but as I said, it would be a pity i
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear release team,
Please binNMU gdb-mingw-w64 now that gdb 7.12 is in testing:
nmu gdb-mingw-w64_10.4 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild using gdb 7.12."
Thanks,
Stephen
-- System Informat
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi
I would like to update ceph with the next stable point release to fix
the 4 security issues listed below. These are all minor issues which did
not warrant a DSA on their own, but
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Uploaded to proposed-updates->stable-new.
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #843999 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package wot/20131118-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
843999: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843999
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
7 matches
Mail list logo
