On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:04:34PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> So, if establishing a threshold is the only way to achieve that for
> example Bug #843038 in "elki" is upgraded to serious again, so be it,
> but as I said, it would be a pity if we invest our time trying to
> estimate probabilities i
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:28:15PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> A severity:important bug does not mean it's all "ok". It means it's
> still a bug, but we can release with it. Autobuilders can build the
> package given a sane number of tries, security uploads can be built
> etc. If they can't due to a
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 08:25:46PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 07:26:59PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > The common rule is that FTBFS is serious. Then there's the real world,
> > where e.g. some tests are timing-dependent and so don't always fail, but
> > having them
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi release team,
I'd like to make a stable upload for systemd with the following changes.
All the changes are cherry-picks/backports from fixes which have already
been applied to sy
Hi all,
On 12/21/16 21:13, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Sure. My main concern here is knowing exactly what the interface between
> britney and debci is going to be. Obviously we don't want a circular
> dependency, so it seems that you are going towards britney knowing how
> to deal with debci, and no
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 09:20:34PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I already started this discussion on IRC (in both #debci and
> #debian-release), but for future reference, and some brain-dump I want
> to continue on the lists.
>
> As most of you have probably noticed by now, I have take
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 18:45 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> I'd like to see an update for #787398 in jessie, as a customer of mine has
> hit this bug, and it's a particularly nasty one.
>
> proposed debdiff:
>
> diff -Nru evolution-data-server-3.12.9~git20141128.524
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #849004 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package
evolution-data-server/3.12.9~git20141128.5242b0-2+deb8u2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
849004: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849004
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bug
Correct what was done to the POWERPC port.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 14:19:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > we're overdue for the next jessie point release. Here are some possible
> > dates, please reply with availability.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 07:26:59PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 12:21:19 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > Do you mean it's better not to have a common rule for these bugs and
> > instead decide on a case by case basis?
> >
> > Could we please agree, at least, that this
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 11:13:52 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2016-12-17 10:03, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > I've told britney to ignore that failure for the next run.
>
> Do we have a list of packages blocked from migration by piuparts only?
> I might go through that list frequently and file
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 14:19:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we're overdue for the next jessie point release. Here are some possible
> dates, please reply with availability.
>
Thanks all for the quick replies. Let's plan for 8.7 on Jan 14th/15th.
Cheers,
Julien
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 12:21:19 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Do you mean it's better not to have a common rule for these bugs and
> instead decide on a case by case basis?
>
> Could we please agree, at least, that this is RC in general and
> maintainers should ask for stretch-ignore tag? I don'
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
I'd like to see an update for #787398 in jessie, as a customer of mine has
hit this bug, and it's a particularly nasty one.
proposed debdiff:
diff -Nru evolution-data-server-3.12.
Hello there!
I've just visited your website and have an offer for you.
I put together an infographic that I think your audience would really enjoy
reading. It's called 9 Ways to Validate Your Startup Ideas.
If you are willing to accept, I would love to use the infographic together
with a unique
On 2016-12-20 21:56:22 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead.
done, thx.
> Regards,
>
> Adam
Sebastian
Hi,
by the time of this email, west-chamber is the only package left for
this transition.
I just tested in my machine, and the package builds fine in unstable
with the new libxtables12.
On 2016-12-04 11:51, Niels Thykier wrote:
> The branch has now been merged. :)
>
> There was a follow up commit to add around the piuparts URLs in the
> html excuses.
piuparts.d.o is now running sid with less strict settings (only warning
on leftover files) matching the settings for stretch, so
18 matches
Mail list logo
