Bug#848613: nmu: dovecot-antispam_2.0+20150222-1~bpo8+1

2016-12-18 Thread Alexander Gerasiov
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu dovecot-antispam_2.0+20150222-1~bpo8+1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against dovecot-abi-2.2.abiv26" -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.11 APT prefers oldstable-updates APT policy: (640

Bug#848610: jessie-pu: package pgpdump/0.28-1+deb8u1

2016-12-18 Thread Christoph Biedl
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hello release team, CVE-2016-4021[1] hasn't been handled in jessie yet. The security team suggested to use an upcoming point release for this, this got ACKed by the stable security

Bug#848607: nmu: dune-grid-glue_2.5.0~20161206g666200e-2, dune-pdelab_2.5.0~20161204gdb53a76-3

2016-12-18 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule binNMUs for dune-grid-glue and dune-pdelab to have them rebuilt against dune-grid 2.5.0-1. nmu dune-grid-glue_2.5.0~20161206g666200e-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild again

Bug#845263: jessie-pu: package w3m/0.5.3-19+deb8u1

2016-12-18 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
On December 17, 2016 at 12:30PM +0100, jcristau (at debian.org) wrote: >> w3m (0.5.3-19+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium > Please go ahead. Uploaded. Thanks, -- Tatsuya Kinoshita pgpZqiZjXwsaR.pgp Description: PGP signature

Processed: Re: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#843543: tigervnc: FTBFS with xserver 1.19

2016-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 843543 846733 Bug #843543 [src:tigervnc] tigervnc: FTBFS with xserver 1.19 Bug #843543 [src:tigervnc] tigervnc: FTBFS with xserver 1.19 Added tag(s) sid and stretch. Bug #846733 [src:tigervnc] tigervnc: FTBFS: debian/rules:126: recipe f

Bug#844264: release.debian.org: Please clarify "Packages must autobuild without failure"

2016-12-18 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 04:36:57PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 12:21:19PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > The alternative is what it's currently happening: "Why bother to ask > > for permission to use stretch-ignore tag when you can always downgrade > > a RC bug to wi

Bug#844264: release.debian.org: Please clarify "Packages must autobuild without failure"

2016-12-18 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 12:21:19PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > The alternative is what it's currently happening: "Why bother to ask > for permission to use stretch-ignore tag when you can always downgrade > a RC bug to wishlist?" (Based on what they do, this is what some > maintainers seem to thi

Bug#844264: release.debian.org: Please clarify "Packages must autobuild without failure"

2016-12-18 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 10:48:00AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 21:19:23 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > Any progress on this? > > > > In case it helps, I made a list of bugs in this FTBFS-randomly category: > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ft