Bug#847726: unblock node-normalize-path 2.0.1-2

2016-12-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
package: release.debian.org Fixes RC bug #846743 (causes gitlab to be marked for autoremoval) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#847725: unblock node-extend-shallow 2.0.1-3

2016-12-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
package: release.debian.org Fixes RC bug #846700 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#847724: unblock node-repeat-element 1.1.2+github-2

2016-12-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
package: release.debian.org Fixes rc bug #846692 (it causes gitlab to be marked auto removal) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: Merge duplicates

2016-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 844815 src:xmltooling Bug #844815 [src:moonshot-gss-eap] moonshot-gss-eap: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libshibsp-dev (>= 2.5+dfsg~moonshot5) Bug reassigned from package 'src:moonshot-gss-eap' to 'src:xmltooling'. No longer m

Processed: Merge duplicates

2016-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 828608 844836 Bug #828608 [src:xmltooling] xmltooling: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Bug #844836 [src:xmltooling] xmltooling: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libxml-security-c-dev (>= 1.7.3-3) Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http

Re: Release impact of introducing a new archive section?

2016-12-10 Thread Josh Triplett
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 04:46:01PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:39:26PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > Of the list of packages in > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2015/05/msg00287.html , aptdaemon > > no longer seems to exist in Debian, and configure-debian no l

Re: Release impact of introducing a new archive section?

2016-12-10 Thread Sean Whitton
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:39:26PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > Of the list of packages in > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2015/05/msg00287.html , aptdaemon > no longer seems to exist in Debian, and configure-debian no longer > hard-codes section names. I also provided a patch for neovim

Bug#842938: jessie-pu: package libwmf/0.2.8.4-10.3+deb8u2

2016-12-10 Thread Bálint Réczey
2016-12-10 22:49 GMT+01:00 Adam D. Barratt : > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo -confirmed > > On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 12:29 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2016-11-10 16:20 GMT+01:00 Adam D. Barratt : >> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo >> > >> > On Wed, 2016-11-02 at 13:39 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrot

Bug#845474: jessie-pu: package sniffit/0.3.7.beta-17

2016-12-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 17:32 -0200, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote: > This update will fix CVE-2014-5439: Root shell on Sniffit[1]. The issue is > already fixed in Sid (since 0.3.7.beta-20, without a bug) and in upstream. > > [1] > http://hmarco.org/bugs/CVE-2014-5439

Processed: Re: Bug#845474: jessie-pu: package sniffit/0.3.7.beta-17

2016-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #845474 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package sniffit/0.3.7.beta-17 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 845474: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=845474 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#842938: jessie-pu: package libwmf/0.2.8.4-10.3+deb8u2

2016-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 -moreinfo -confirmed Bug #842938 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package libwmf/0.2.8.4-10.3+deb8u2 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #842938 to the same tags previously set Bug #842938 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package libwmf/0.2.8.4-10.3+deb8u2 Ig

Bug#842938: jessie-pu: package libwmf/0.2.8.4-10.3+deb8u2

2016-12-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo -confirmed On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 12:29 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: > Hi, > > 2016-11-10 16:20 GMT+01:00 Adam D. Barratt : > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > > > On Wed, 2016-11-02 at 13:39 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: > >> The Security Team suggested fixing the CVE-2016

Bug#846017: jessie-pu: package ieee-data/20150531.1~deb8u1

2016-12-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sun, 2016-11-27 at 15:10 -0500, Luciano Bello wrote: > I would like to remove the cron job in ieee-data (closes: #826104) since > we are DDoS IEEE servers every month. I was hopping that the amount of stable > installations were gentle with their servers, but

Processed: Re: Bug#845564: jessie-pu: package lxc/1:1.0.6-6+deb8u5

2016-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #845564 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package lxc/1:1.0.6-6+deb8u5 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 845564: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=845564 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#846017: jessie-pu: package ieee-data/20150531.1~deb8u1

2016-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #846017 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package ieee-data/20150531.1~deb8u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 846017: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=846017 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#845564: jessie-pu: package lxc/1:1.0.6-6+deb8u5

2016-12-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 17:59 +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote: > even if lxc/1:1.0.6-6+deb8u4 did not reach stable yet (see #844150), > we would like to fix another bug in stable: > #845465 aka CVE-2016-8649: attach: do not send procfd to attached process > it was marked as n

Processed: Re: Bug#846948: jessie-pu: package file/1:5.22+15-2+deb8u3

2016-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #846948 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package file/1:5.22+15-2+deb8u3 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 846948: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=846948 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#846031: jessie-pu: package tre/0.8.0-4+deb8u1

2016-12-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 00:50 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > Salvatore told me that this does not warrant a DSA. so I've prepared > this upload for jessie-proposed-updates, to be considered for stable. > It fixes CVE-2016-8859. Please go ahead. Regards, Adam

Bug#846948: jessie-pu: package file/1:5.22+15-2+deb8u3

2016-12-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sun, 2016-12-04 at 15:56 +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: > A memory leak was found in in libmagic's (src:file) loader of magic > files, appearently independently by Shi Yin in PR/569[1] and Arnaud > Quette in #840754[2]. This was fixed upstream in version 5.29 which i

Processed: Re: Bug#846031: jessie-pu: package tre/0.8.0-4+deb8u1

2016-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #846031 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package tre/0.8.0-4+deb8u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 846031: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=846031 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#847593: marked as done (unblock: letsencrypt.sh/0.3.0-2)

2016-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2016 18:31:50 +0100 with message-id <20161210173150.gc8...@mraw.org> and subject line Re: Bug#847593: unblock: letsencrypt.sh/0.3.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #847593, regarding unblock: letsencrypt.sh/0.3.0-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Processed (with 5 errors): Bug#847636: Re: unblock node-cpr

2016-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # bcc to control@ > user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). > usertags 847636 + unblock There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: unblock. > tags 84763

Bug#847636: Re: unblock node-cpr

2016-12-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
# bcc to control@ user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 847636 + unblock tags 847636 + moreinfo On Sat, 2016-12-10 at 10:45 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > package: release-debian.org Please either use reportbug or add the correct metadata yourself (and preferably use package names

Processed: Reassign, package name contained typo

2016-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 847636 release.debian.org Bug #847636 [release-debian.org] unblock node-cpr Warning: Unknown package 'release-debian.org' Bug reassigned from package 'release-debian.org' to 'release.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions o

Processed: Merge duplicates (2nd try)

2016-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 803680 Bug #803680 {Done: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort } [release.debian.org] Transistion: liblinear Unarchived Bug 803680 > forcemerge 799805 804356 Bug #799805 [src:kytea] kytea: Problem with upcoming new version of liblinear Bug #804356 [s

Bug#827061: transition: openssl: Unrelated updates to rdep packages?

2016-12-10 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 10/12/16 14:08, Christian Seiler wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/26/2016 10:55 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Control: tags -1 confirmed > > I have a quick question now that the transition is ongoing: is it OK > for me to upload a new version of open-isns (B-D: libssl-dev) that's > unrelated to t

Bug#827061: transition: openssl: Unrelated updates to rdep packages?

2016-12-10 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, On 10/26/2016 10:55 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed I have a quick question now that the transition is ongoing: is it OK for me to upload a new version of open-isns (B-D: libssl-dev) that's unrelated to this transition? (New upstream version, some debconf transl