package: release.debian.org
Fixes RC bug #846007
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2016 01:34:48 +0100
with message-id <3725b95f-81f2-2fc0-93e0-6018f1d22...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#847568: nmu: util-vserver_0.30.216-pre3120-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #847568,
regarding nmu: util-vserver_0.30.216-pre3120-1.1
to be marked as don
Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2016 01:34:31 +0100
with message-id <62656a8a-f940-cb74-8c46-3bc640b23...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#847564: nmu: fgetty_0.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #847564,
regarding nmu: fgetty_0.7-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2016 01:35:44 +0100
with message-id <6951a3b8-804b-58c5-ae4b-f3a6390d7...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#847622: nmu: kodi-pvr-hdhomerun_2.4.2+git20160820-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #847622,
regarding nmu: kodi-pvr-hdhomerun_2.4.2+git20160820-1
to be mar
Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2016 01:32:36 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#843265: transition: xorg-server
has caused the Debian Bug report #843265,
regarding transition: xorg-server
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu kodi-pvr-hdhomerun_2.4.2+git20160820-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild
against libhdhomerun3."
libhdhomerun recently had a soname bump. Luckily there is only one
dependency :-)
Andreas
control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/320
Dear realease team,
What is the next step?
Thank you
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: reopen 846385
> Control: severity 846385 serious
>
> tl;dr: yes, this is clearly an ABI break.
>
> O
clone 828266 -1
severity 828266 serious
close 828266
fixed-version 828266 302-5.2
done
Debian Bug Tracking System:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
>> # it still fails to build with openssl 1.1
>> reopen 828266
> [...]
Hi Sebastian,
Thanks for helping track these.
There ha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # it still fails to build with openssl 1.1
> reopen 828266
Bug #828266 {Done: Andrey Rahmatullin } [src:ckermit] ckermit:
FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please urgent package letsencrypt.sh.
The current version contains a typo which causes a huge big failure in
certain systems (somehow none of the systems I tested hit it, the bug
was report
package: release.debian.org
ruby-jquery-rails 4.2.1-2 fixes grave bug #846916 (which affects
diaspora) and diaspora 0.6.0.0+debian-6 drops patches to use
ruby-jquery-rails 4.2.1-2
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu util-vserver_0.30.216-pre3120-1.1 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Build with a
dietlibc that doesn't use vsyscall"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable-deb
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu fgetty_0.7-1 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Build with a dietlibc that doesn't
use vsyscall"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500
On Sat, 05 Nov 2016 17:38:17 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> We have been working on the new xserver for the past month. I have been
> running it for a week or two without any issues. Some drivers fail to
> build, but they have fixes in upstream git that we will apply. But most
> drivers jus
Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2016 09:20:10 +0100
with message-id <716efcae-8b44-1fe2-52c5-63f17cc42...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#847490: unblock: ffmpeg/7:3.2.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #847490,
regarding unblock: ffmpeg/7:3.2.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2016 09:19:42 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#847481: unblock: abiword/3.0.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #847481,
regarding unblock: abiword/3.0.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On 09/12/16 05:29, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>
> On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 7 12:32:00 PM IST, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I have added a hint to ignore the piuparts issues.
>
> That hint is not active, 8 days and it still says not considered. It
> completed 5 days before the 10 day mandatory migration started
17 matches
Mail list logo
