On Wednesday 23 November 2016 01:07 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I am quite reluctant to give an exception to this. IMHO if it has to go in
> non-free with rdeps in contrib, that's better than not having those rdeps at
> all, and it can be improved to having them in main in the future when a
Your message dated Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:55:48 +0800
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#825342: mips/mipsel: make sure all packages built with
fpxx enabled
has caused the Debian Bug report #825342,
regarding mips/mipsel: make sure all packages built with fpxx enabled
to be marked as done.
T
Hi!
This was discussed relatively recently, but it was not entirely clear
to me what was the conclusion, if there was any(?), about enabling
bindnow by default.
And although this got enabled by default in gcc-6 6.2.0-7 when PIE
also got enabled, it seems it got disabled in 6.2.0-10 when I pointed
On 2016-11-22 16:18, Stephen Dowdy wrote:
> sorry to butt-in here, but:
>
> FYI: typo alert? fqsrt -> fsqrt ?? (transposition of q & s)
>
> I know it's just in the e-mail twice and the patch changelog once, but it'd
> be good if the changelog was typographically correct, esp for searches.
Th
sorry to butt-in here, but:
FYI: typo alert? fqsrt -> fsqrt ?? (transposition of q & s)
I know it's just in the e-mail twice and the patch changelog once, but it'd be
good if the changelog was typographically correct, esp for searches.
--stephen
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear stable release managers,
I would like to upload a new glibc package for the next jessie release.
Here is the changelog with some additional comment:
* Update from upstream s
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:11:09 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#842846: New ros-vision-opencv transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #842846,
regarding transition: ros-vision-opencv
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 819530 + pending
Bug #819530 [release.debian.org] transition: icu
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
819530: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819530
Debian B
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:07:57 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#842571: transition: tango
has caused the Debian Bug report #842571,
regarding transition: tango
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:13:25 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#841911: transition: pari
has caused the Debian Bug report #841911,
regarding transition: pari
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 842821 + pending
Bug #842821 [release.debian.org] transition: hypre
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
842821: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842821
Debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 843334 + pending
Bug #843334 [release.debian.org] transition: czmq
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
843334: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843334
Debian
Martin Pitt:
> Hello Niels,
>
> Niels Thykier [2016-11-13 12:53 +]:
>> [...]
>> * It cherry-picks 4 commits proposed by Martin Pitt to assist Ubuntu
>>with refactoring some their changes into policies.
>>
>> Martin Pitt (4):
>> Move build checks before running policies
>
> This nee
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:05:58 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#841863: transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit
has caused the Debian Bug report #841863,
regarding transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:07:06 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#840501: transition: ipython
has caused the Debian Bug report #840501,
regarding transition: ipython
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Niels Thykier:
>
> Hi,
>
> I intend to merge the branch [britney-patch-bundle-201611] consisting
> of 21 patches into master no later than Monday the 21st of November. It
> has been tested with [no regressions].
> * I have Cc'ed people, whom I know run Britney
>
>
> [...]
>
This was merged
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:29:26 + Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: iptab...@packages.debian.org
> Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-iptables.html
>
On 16/11/16 13:03, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>
> On 2016, നവംബർ 12 9:46:15 PM IST, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> We now have grunt in the archive, but the upstream philosophy of grunt
>> is to force everyone to use a locally installed grunt for each project
>> and not support using globally installed g
Afif Elghraoui:
>
>
> على الأحد 20 تشرين الثاني 2016 23:05، كتب Niels Thykier:
>> Which source packages are we talking about?
>
> gridengine and ori. In the case of gridengine, we have a contributed
> patch, but it has not been applied upstream or seen more than
> compile-testing. In the case o
Hello,
We could not deliver your parcel. Delivery Label is attached to this email.
Minne Casaus - Area Manager FedEx , CA
Thank you for choosing FedEx
FedEx.doc
Description: MS-Word document
On 2016-11-22 16:42, Jens Sauer wrote:
(dropping 845311@)
According to my inbox it's possible to perform source-only uploads for
jessie-proposed-updates (at least it worked for src:debian-installer),
so I've just sponsored your package this way. Please close the RFS if
it
gets queued as expec
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:53:41 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#836010: nmu: libodb_2.4.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #836010,
regarding nmu: libodb_2.4.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Hi,
On 26/07/16 06:39, YunQiang Su wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> On 09/06/16 21:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 07/06/16 19:38, YunQiang Su wrote:
After the 1st step of binNMU of mipsel (mips is still running),
>>>
>>> mips is finally c
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:56:20 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#818104: nmu: xul-ext-*
has caused the Debian Bug report #818104,
regarding nmu: xul-ext-*
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
(dropping 845311@)
> According to my inbox it's possible to perform source-only uploads for
> jessie-proposed-updates (at least it worked for src:debian-installer),
> so I've just sponsored your package this way. Please close the RFS if it
> gets queued as expected; otherwise I'll re-sponsor the p
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #828557 [src:sslsniff] sslsniff: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> unblock 827061 by -1
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 837960 828416 828297 828480 828462 828250
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 843265 with 843543 845331
Bug #843265 [release.debian.org] transition: xorg-server
843265 was not blocked by any bugs.
843265 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 843265: 845331 and 843543
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
P
On 2016-11-22 12:45, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Adam D. Barratt]
Yes, please. I've flagged the current upload for rejection. Once you
receive the confirmation from dak that the rejection has been
actioned, please upload the new build.
When I build in a fresh jessie chroot, I get this debdiff:
[Adam D. Barratt]
> Yes, please. I've flagged the current upload for rejection. Once you
> receive the confirmation from dak that the rejection has been
> actioned, please upload the new build.
When I build in a fresh jessie chroot, I get this debdiff:
% debdiff /var/cache/apt/archives/isenkram_
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 at 10:49:11 +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> I missed the point that libxtables (which is in src:iptables) added a
> few new symbols that triggers transitions.
Wait, *added* a few new symbols?
Adding symbols is not usually meant to trigger a transition; it just needs
a
(dropping debian-boot@, adding 845311@)
Hi Jens,
Jens Sauer (2016-11-22):
> Thank you for reviewing this package. It was my first time doing this,
> I hope everything is alright.
It looks to me everything was right on the first attempt. :)
> I opened a RFS to find a sponsor for the upload:
> h
Am Sonntag, den 20.11.2016, 19:27 +0100 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> Control: tag -1 + confirmed - moreinfo
>
> Jonathan Wiltshire (2016-11-20):
> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 01:52:25PM +0100, Jens Sauer wrote:
> > > I prepared a package for mdadm to fix bug #840743
> > > (https://bugs.debian.org/840
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:51:08 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#812573: nmu: libaec_0.3.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #812573,
regarding nmu: libaec_0.3.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:48:49 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#832470: nmu: deal.ii_8.4.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #832470,
regarding nmu: deal.ii_8.4.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
On 22 November 2016 at 10:39, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
> To the maintainer: Why bump to a snapshot at this point in the cycle? Have the
> rdeps been build-tested against the new libxtables? Are you aware we are in
> the
> transition freeze and this is a transition?
>
I bumped to a snapsho
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:44:43 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#838692: nmu: nlopt_2.4.2+dfsg-1~bpo70+1
has caused the Debian Bug report #838692,
regarding nmu: nlopt_2.4.2+dfsg-1~bpo70+1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:41:54 +0100
with message-id <1333f4fc-7a50-4240-d44a-c1fdcb864...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#842816: nmu: syslog-ng_3.7.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #842816,
regarding nmu: syslog-ng_3.7.3-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:43:25 +0100
with message-id <0e77ca06-4b7a-e51f-d810-27083a224...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#838693: nmu: libteam_1.12-2~bpo70+1
has caused the Debian Bug report #838693,
regarding nmu: libteam_1.12-2~bpo70+1
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
On 22 November 2016 at 10:29, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> src:iptables contains libxtables, which bumped SONAME recently,
> starting a small uncoordinated transition. For extra confusion,
> libxtables.so.12 was briefly shipped in libxtables11 (#844755);
> after that was fixed, until today's upload,
On 22/11/16 10:29, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: iptab...@packages.debian.org
> Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-iptables.html
>
> src:iptables
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:35:00 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#845276: nmu: slepc_3.7.3+dfsg1-2+b1
has caused the Debian Bug report #845276,
regarding nmu: slepc_3.7.3+dfsg1-2+b1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: iptab...@packages.debian.org
Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-iptables.html
src:iptables contains libxtables, which bumped SONAME recently,
starti
On 11/21/2016 06:42 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> +monotone (1.1-4+deb8u2) jessie-security; urgency=high
>
> With the distribution updated to "jessie", please go ahead.
Thanks. With that change, I uploaded monotone-1.1-4+deb8u2.
Regards
Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signa
Plaats een track & trace systeem in uw vloot en ontvang gratis een 40" LED
TV*
- Besparing op brandstof kosten
- Beveiliging van uw materiaal en wagens
- Planning optimalisatie
Ja, ik wens van deze tijdelijke offerte te genieten:
http://www.kapamedia.eu/bizztrack/form.htm?lng=nl&tg=bizztrack&utm_
On 22 November 2016 at 05:00, James McCoy wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 02:00:47AM +, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
>> Changes:
>> iptables (1.6.0+snapshot20161117-2) unstable; urgency=medium
>> .
>>* [146c602] libxtables: bump from libxtables11 to libxtables12 (Closes:
>> #8447
45 matches
Mail list logo
