control: reassign -1 src:datapacker
>Can't binNMU it as it is uploaded and not installed. This may need a sourceful
>upload (unless there's a way to convince wanna-build to binNMU it anyway,
>possibly with wanna-build rather than the wb tool).
I don't want to loose more of your precious time :)
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:datapacker
Bug #843420 [release.debian.org] nmu: datapacker_1.0.1+nmu2
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'src:datapacker'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #843420 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to
Processing changes file: nettle_2.7.1-5+deb8u2_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nettle_2.7.1-5+deb8u2_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nettle_2.7.1-5+deb8u2_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nettle_2.7.1-5+deb8u2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nettle_2.7.1-5+deb8u2_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nettle_2.7.1-5+deb8u2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes f
Processing changes file: tzdata_2016i-0+deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 23:14 +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> lördag 5 november 2016 kl. 20:17:40 CET skrev du:
> > On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 18:07 +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > > Here is a debdiff for a proposed upload to address CVE-2016-6489 ("RSA
> > > code is vulnerab
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #843268 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package nettle/2.7.1-5+deb8u2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
843268: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843268
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 15:08 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:57:47 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 15:49 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > > I've prepared an update for libdatetime-timezone-perl to incorporate
> > > the ch
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #843171 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package
libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.75-2+2016i
Added tag(s) pending.
--
843171: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843171
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr
Processing changes file: libdatetime-timezone-perl_1.75-2+2016i_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nettle_2.7.1-5+deb8u2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Control: reopen 842919
Debian Bug Tracking System writes ("Bug#842919 closed by Matthias Klose
(Re: Bug#842919: ld spins eating cpu)"):
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the release.debian.org package:
>
> #842919: transition: xen
>
> It ha
Processing control commands:
> reopen 842919
Bug #842919 [release.debian.org] transition: xen
Bug 842919 is not marked as done; doing nothing.
--
842919: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842919
843451: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843451
Debian Bug Tracking Sy
Processing control commands:
> reopen 842919
Bug #842919 [release.debian.org] transition: xen
Bug 842919 is not marked as done; doing nothing.
--
842919: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842919
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi Emilio,
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 04:17:55PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > Please also binNMU plasma-integration against the new qtbase.
> >
> > It links with the static library libQt5PlatformSupport.a, and should pick
> > up the new version of it.
>
> Done. I wonder if this shouldn't
Your message dated Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:41:11 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#842919: ld spins eating cpu
has caused the Debian Bug report #842919,
regarding transition: xen
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
# Package: binutils
# Version: 2.27.51.20161105-1
# Severity: important
# Control: block 842919 by -1
# -> #843451
# -iwj
To reproduce, in an amd64 sid chroot:
dgit clone xen experimental
cd xen
dpkg-buildpackage -uc -b
top reports:
PID USER PR NIVIRTRESSHR S %CPU %ME
Alex Santos:
> Hello
>
> Just a quick question on the bulk of PPC architecture and the eventual
> abandonment.
>
> I admit that my question may seem naive so I apologize.
>
> How long can we expect PPC G3, G4 and G5 architectures to continue seeing
> security updates? Is there a clear roadmap.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Ohai,
I would love to fix #726661 in stable. The bug currently prevents the use
of pam_loginuid in non-privileged containers → you cannot SSH into them.
The patch has been in unsta
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 01:43:23PM +0100, Alex Santos wrote:
> How long can we expect PPC G3, G4 and G5 architectures to continue seeing
> security updates? Is there a clear roadmap. Again, I apologize for being
> ignorant on the topic.
the current Jessie release will be supported regularily unt
On 06/11/16 15:38, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 09:17:46AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> Go go go!
>
> Please also binNMU plasma-integration against the new qtbase.
>
> It links with the static library libQt5Pl
On 05/11/16 21:37, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 843040 842815
>
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 05/11/2016 à 17:29 :
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 04/11/16 14:45, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>>> Gilles Filippini a écrit le 02/11/2016 à 19:05 :
Hi,
Good new
On 06/11/16 13:43, Alex Santos wrote:
> Hello
>
> Just a quick question on the bulk of PPC architecture and the eventual
> abandonment.
>
> I admit that my question may seem naive so I apologize.
>
> How long can we expect PPC G3, G4 and G5 architectures to continue seeing
> security updates?
On 06/11/16 16:06, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> Severity: normal
>
> nmu datapacker_1.0.1+nmu2 . armel . unstable . -m "rebuild to increase the
> version, due to armel haskell stack removal"
>
>
>
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
nmu datapacker_1.0.1+nmu2 . armel . unstable . -m "rebuild to increase the
version, due to armel haskell stack removal"
as discussed over irc #buildd, that package got removed during haske
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #843411 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package musl/1.1.5-2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
843411: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843411
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 14:58 +0100, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> musl in jessie is affected by CVE-2016-8859.
> The attached patch cherry-picks the upstream commit,
> which fixes this issue.
> The security team marked it as no-dsa, so I'm requesting
> it to be included in t
Dear release team,
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 09:17:46AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> Go go go!
Please also binNMU plasma-integration against the new qtbase.
It links with the static library libQt5PlatformSupport.a, and should pick
up the new version of it.
On Sun, 06 Nov 2016 10:57:47 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 15:49 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > I've prepared an update for libdatetime-timezone-perl to incorporate
> > the changes of the Olson db release 2016i, as usual with a quilt
> > patch only touching the data file
Hello
Just a quick question on the bulk of PPC architecture and the eventual
abandonment.
I admit that my question may seem naive so I apologize.
How long can we expect PPC G3, G4 and G5 architectures to continue seeing
security updates? Is there a clear roadmap. Again, I apologize for being
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
musl in jessie is affected by CVE-2016-8859.
The attached patch cherry-picks the upstream commit,
which fixes this issue.
The security team marked it as no-dsa, so I'm requestin
On 24/10/2016 22:07, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Please rebuild ocaml against the pie-enabled compiler chain, to fix an FTBFS
> of scilab package:
>
FWIW, I have uploaded ocaml/4.02.3-8 to fix issues on armhf this morning. And I
have just given back scilab on armhf. It /should/ fix scilab's build f
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 15:49 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> I've prepared an update for libdatetime-timezone-perl to incorporate
> the changes of the Olson db release 2016i, as usual with a quilt
> patch only touching the data files.
>
> This release contains changes
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #843171 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package
libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.75-2+2016i
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
843171: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843171
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit
On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 11:01 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 06/11/16 00:43, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 22:43:46 + Luca Boccassi
> > wrote:
> >> Package: release.debian.org
> >> Severity: normal
> >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> >> Usertags: transit
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 06/11/16 00:43, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 22:43:46 + Luca Boccassi
> wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> Dear release team,
>>
>> czmq 4.0.0 was r
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #843334 [release.debian.org] transition: czmq
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
843334: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843334
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
37 matches
Mail list logo
