Bug#841265: transition: cfitsio

2016-10-20 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2016-10-20 13:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 19/10/16 07:47, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > The cfitsio library changed its ABI i

Bug#841462: jessie-pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.75-2+2016h

2016-10-20 Thread gregor herrmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Another month, another tzdata update. As usual, I've added a quilt patch for the Olson db, this time 2016h, to libdatetime-timezone-p

Re: Enabling PIE by default for Stretch

2016-10-20 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Adrian, 2016-10-20 21:02 GMT+02:00 Adrian Bunk : > Hi, > > since PIE is now default in unstable, I assume all/most of these bugs > should be changed to RC? Yes, they should. I was hoping to get some feedback on the dpkg bugs [1,2] because those changes would also be integral part of the transi

Re: ppc64el porter situation

2016-10-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:58:21PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:54:43PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > I think Freescala/NXP might disagree. Not sure if the e6500 core could > > ruin ppc64el or not, but they certainly make a lot of powerpc chips. > > That should

Re: ppc64el porter situation

2016-10-20 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:54:43PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > I think Freescala/NXP might disagree. Not sure if the e6500 core could > ruin ppc64el or not, but they certainly make a lot of powerpc chips. That should have said 'run' not 'ruin'. That would have been rather interesting otherw

Re: ppc64el porter situation

2016-10-20 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:22:14PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MeeGo#Companies_supporting_the_project > > That's also an impressive list of companies, isn't it? > When the one company that mattered switched to a different platform, > the whole platform collapsed immed

Re: ppc64el porter situation

2016-10-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:06:59PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hi, Hi Aurelien, >... > To me it looks like they are really skilled for that job. Do you have > actual facts showing the contrary? Niels said that I shouldn't hesitate to let the release team know when I believe there is an issue

Re: ppc64el porter situation

2016-10-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 09:06:14AM -0200, Breno Leitao wrote: > Hello Adrian, Hi Breno, > Let me share my view as the only DD listed as ppc64el porter. thanks for your reply. Just to state it explicitely in case that was not clear, I do not have any problem with you personally or the ppc64el p

Re: Enabling PIE by default for Stretch

2016-10-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
Hi, since PIE is now default in unstable, I assume all/most of these bugs should be changed to RC? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=pie-bindnow-20160906&users=bal...@balintreczey.hu;dist=unstable cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out

RIVERVIEW. Luxueus wonen met een adembenemend uitzicht in hartje Nieuwpoort?

2016-10-20 Thread Riverview Nieuwpoort
Deze email nieuwsbrief werd in grafisch HTML formaat verzonden. Als u deze tekstversie ziet, verkiest uw email programma "gewone tekst" emails. U kan de originele nieuwsbrief online bekijken: http://ymlp15.com/zn3LeA -

Processed: Properly merge to the root cause

2016-10-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 837658 serious Bug #837658 [libfl-dev] libfl-dev: Please build libfl_pic.a with -fPIC Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > unblock 840394 by 837658 Bug #840394 [src:motif] motif: FTBFS: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against symbol `ex

3-D Secure Aktualisierung

2016-10-20 Thread Card Complete
Sendungscode: 3189756462015837 20. Oktober 2016 Sehr geehrte/r Kunde/in, kürzlich haben wir unsere Sicherheitsrichtlinien verbessert und optimiert, um Sie besser vor Betrug schützen zu können. Bedingt durch das neue Sicherheitssystem ist eine Aktualisierung Ihres 3-D Secure Verfahrens e

Processed: Re: Bug#841265: transition: cfitsio

2016-10-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #841265 [release.debian.org] transition: cfitsio Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 841265: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841265 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#841265: transition: cfitsio

2016-10-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 19/10/16 07:47, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > The cfitsio library changed its ABI in the latest release version. > The new version, including the packag

Bug#839869: transition: poppler 0.48.0

2016-10-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 18/10/16 23:30, Pino Toscano wrote: > In data lunedì 17 ottobre 2016 21:11:00 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha > scritto: >> On 08/10/16 20:34, Pino Toscano wrote: >>> In data giovedì 6 ottobre 2016 10:25:57 CEST, Rene Engelhard ha scritto: Hi, On Wed,

Processed: Re: Bug#839869: transition: poppler 0.48.0

2016-10-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #839869 [release.debian.org] transition: poppler 0.48.0 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 839869: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839869 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: Next d-i release

2016-10-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 20/10/16 13:25, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2016-10-20): >>> Since linux vs. fat/efi is no longer an issue, I'm tempted to prepare >>> a new d-i release soonish. I'll probably freeze udebs in the upcoming >>> hours or days, and try to figure out what to do with packages sit

Re: Next d-i release

2016-10-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2016-10-20): > > Since linux vs. fat/efi is no longer an issue, I'm tempted to prepare > > a new d-i release soonish. I'll probably freeze udebs in the upcoming > > hours or days, and try to figure out what to do with packages sitting > > in unstable for the time being. > >

Re: Next d-i release

2016-10-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 19/10/16 15:33, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Since linux vs. fat/efi is no longer an issue, I'm tempted to prepare > a new d-i release soonish. I'll probably freeze udebs in the upcoming > hours or days, and try to figure out what to do with packages sitting > in unstable for the time being