On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:25:30 +0200 Balint Reczey
wrote:
> Package: gcc-6
> Version: 6.1.1-12
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Matthias,
>
> As a continuation of the discussions [1][2] on debian-devel I'm
> attaching the simple patch that implements enabling the PIE
> hardening flags f
Niels Thykier:
> Hi,
>
> As brought up on the meeting last night, I think we should try to go for
> PIE by default in Stretch on all release architectures!
> * It is a substantial hardening feature
> * Upstream has vastly reduced the performance penalty for x86
> * The majority of all porters b
On Sun, 2016-10-09 at 21:12 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> [ adding debian-powerpc ]
>
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 06:54:44PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > Niels Thykier schrieb:
> > > If I am to support powerpc as a realease architecture for Stretch, I
> > > need to know that there are *active*
[ adding debian-powerpc ]
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 06:54:44PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Niels Thykier schrieb:
> > If I am to support powerpc as a realease architecture for Stretch, I
> > need to know that there are *active* porters behind it committed to
> > keeping it in the working. Pe
Niels Thykier schrieb:
> If I am to support powerpc as a realease architecture for Stretch, I
> need to know that there are *active* porters behind it committed to
> keeping it in the working. People who would definitely catch such
> issues long before the release. People who file bugs / submit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # bugs with submitter b...@sandroknauss.de
> submitter 839905 !
Bug #839905 [pkg-kde-tools] pkgkde-symbolshelper: Use of uninitialized value in
concatenation (.) or string at /usr/bin/pkgkde-symbolshelper line 318.
Changed Bug submitter to 'Sandr
Your message dated Sun, 9 Oct 2016 17:16:41 +0300
with message-id <20161009141641.42jxs5zwmpkey...@bunk.spdns.de>
and subject line guile-1.8 has already been removed from unstable and testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #813272,
regarding RM: guile-1.8/1.8.8+1-10
to be marked as done.
This me
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi Stable Release Managers,
X-Debbugs-CC'ed Andreas Metzler.
gnutls28 in jessie is affected by CVE-2016-7444, GNUTLS-SA-2016-3,
having a flaw in the OCSP certificate check. This wa
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 10:34:55AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-10-09 at 00:16 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 08:14:38PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 20:50 +, Jelmer Vernooij
On Sun, 2016-10-09 at 00:16 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 08:14:38PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 20:50 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > I'd like to update Samba in jessie to 4.2.14+dfsg. Debdiff is
On 09/10/16 00:22, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Vlad,
>
> thanks for taking this initiative of communication. Much appreciated.
>
> I try to give some answers, Niels may jump in and correct me, if necessary.
>
> On Fr 07 Okt 2016 14:51:47 CEST, Vlad Orlov wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> It depends on what
On 08/10/16 09:51, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2016-09-10 10:37, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> would it be OK to tag "maintainer address bounces" bugs as jessie-ignore?
>
> This would affect about 10 bugs in jessie and a few less in wheezy.
I wouldn't do that to these bugs for now, as I t
12 matches
Mail list logo
