Bug#834545: transition: re2

2016-09-01 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Emilio (2016.08.31_00:35:21_+0200) > > Would you mind if I held back for the next release, due on the 1st? So, that is staged in git and ready to go. It will require a 1-line patch to ocaml-re2 (inserting an std::), and ruby-re2 should be binnmuable. chromium-browser, libphonenumber, and hhvm

Processed: Re: Bug#836342: UDD/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl: Version in autoremoval notice may not be version actually checked

2016-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 release.debian.org Bug #836342 [qa.debian.org] UDD/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl: Version in autoremoval notice may not be version actually checked Bug reassigned from package 'qa.debian.org' to 'release.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found ve

Re: Bug#836342: UDD/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl: Version in autoremoval notice may not be version actually checked

2016-09-01 Thread Paul Wise
Control: reassign -1 release.debian.org Control: retitle -1 Version in autoremoval notice may not be version actually checked As you can see in the headers of the mail, the autoremoval warnings are sent by the release team not the QA infrastructure. On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Rebecca N. Palm

Bug#835170: transition: protobuf

2016-09-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 01/09/16 22:36, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 08/31/2016 04:59 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 31/08/16 12:00, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> Just for the record, osmium rebuilds are failing because most tests >>> segfault by >>> having two versions of libdap installed. Caused by

Bug#836258: transition: chromaprint

2016-09-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 01/09/16 09:08, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-chromaprint.html > > chromapri

Processed: Re: Bug#836258: transition: chromaprint

2016-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #836258 [release.debian.org] transition: chromaprint Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 836258: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=836258 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: grads: FTBFS with libdap 3.18.0

2016-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 836192 by -1 Bug #836192 [release.debian.org] transition: libdap 836192 was blocked by: 836173 836187 836192 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 836192: 836338 -- 836192: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=836192 836338: http://b

Bug#836192: transition: libdap

2016-09-01 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 08/31/2016 12:31 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > As discussed in the protobuf transition bugreport, the upload of > libdap (3.18.0-1) to unstable has triggered another uncoordinated > transition, which is causing the osmium rebuilds to fail. > > Before the reverse dependencies can be rebuilt, the b

Bug#835170: transition: protobuf

2016-09-01 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 08/31/2016 04:59 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 31/08/16 12:00, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> Just for the record, osmium rebuilds are failing because most tests segfault >> by >> having two versions of libdap installed. Caused by the uncoordinated >> transition >> triggered with the

Bug#836250: transition: gloox

2016-09-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 01/09/16 05:48, Vincent Cheng wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively > small > transition, w

Bug#834419: jessie-pu: package glibc/2.19-18+deb8u6

2016-09-01 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2016-08-28 16:54, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2016-08-28 14:59, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 11:23 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On 2016-08-15 15:29, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > [...] > > > > I would like to upload a new glibc package for the next jessie release. > > > >

Processed: Re: Bug#836250: transition: gloox

2016-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #836250 [release.debian.org] transition: gloox Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 836250: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=836250 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: transition: chromaprint

2016-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-chromaprint.html Bug #836258 [release.debian.org] transition: chromaprint Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-chromaprint.html'. -- 836258: http://bugs.debi

Bug#836258: transition: chromaprint

2016-09-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-chromaprint.html chromaprint bumped the SONAME of libchromaprint and needs a transition. All reverse dependencies b