Processed: Change submitter

2016-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > submitter 664822 ! Bug #664822 [dpkg] dpkg: incomplete cleanup of empty directories Bug #316521 [dpkg] dpkg: incomplete cleanup of empty directories Bug #348133 [dpkg] dpkg: incomplete cleanup of empty directories Bug #538429 [dpkg] dpkg: incomple

Bug#835170: transition: protobuf

2016-08-24 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 08/24/16 13:57, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: For hurd-i386 a patch is needed to define PATH_MAX, and on kfreebsd-* the builds fails with: google/protobuf/stubs/stringpiece_unittest.cc: In member function 'virtual void google::protobuf::{anonymous}::NonNegativeLenTest_NonNegativeLen_Test::Tes

Bug#835324: nmu: mutt_1.6.2-3

2016-08-24 Thread Antonio Radici
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu mutt_1.6.2-3 . adm64 . -m "recompile against unstable on amd64" Hi, unfortunately I uploaded a package that was built against stable to the unstable distribution and now the mutt 1.6.2-3

Processed: Merge #835290 & #835302

2016-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 835170 by 835290 Bug #835170 [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf 835170 was blocked by: 835302 835266 835170 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 835170: 835290 > merge 835302 835290 Bug #835302 [src:protobuf] protobuf:

Bug#835170: transition: protobuf

2016-08-24 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 08/23/16 12:07, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 08/23/16 11:32, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On s390x, alpha & sparc64 the build fails with: ./.libs/libprotobuf.so: undefined reference to `google::protobuf::internal::NoBarrier_AtomicIncrement(long volatile*, long)' ./.libs/libprotobuf.so: u

Processed: protobuf: FTBFS on s390x (undefined reference to `google::protobuf::internal::NoBarrier_*')

2016-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 835170 by -1 Bug #835170 [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf 835170 was blocked by: 835266 835170 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 835170: 835302 -- 835170: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835170 835302: http://bugs.d

Bug#835170: transition: protobuf

2016-08-24 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Wednesday, 24 August 2016 6:08:00 AM AEST Niels Thykier wrote: > Please review https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions for > the next transition. Most of the preparation can be done in your own > cadence and you can request the slot in parallel with the final > preparation on your