On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 06:57:47PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [Why is this CCed to quite so many places / people?]
I've tried to cut it down now that this is just about the stable update.
> On Mon, 2016-07-18 at 14:48 +, nord-stream wrote:
> > See the attached files.
> >
> > nord-stream
Hi
We intend to upload linux version 4.6.4-1 on tuesday or wednesday. It
includes a stable update (4.6.4) and some other fixes:
[ Uwe Kleine-K??nig ]
* Cherry pick patches for rtc-s35390a from next. (Closes: #794266)
.
[ Salvatore Bonaccorso ]
* apparmor: fix oops, validate buffer si
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 08:36:22PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On 2016-07-18 20:11, Peter Colberg wrote:
> > nmu julia_0.4.6-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libutf8proc2"
>
> I assume this is a mini transition for #829236. Next time please provide
> some context and save one of us
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:36:22 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#831728: nmu: julia_0.4.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #831728,
regarding nmu: julia_0.4.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu julia_0.4.6-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libutf8proc2"
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Why is this CCed to quite so many places / people?]
On Mon, 2016-07-18 at 14:48 +, nord-stream wrote:
> See the attached files.
>
> nord-stream
A debdiff between two versions of the package is not that helpful to
convince anyone that the new version should be added to stable, given
that no
On Mon, 2016-07-18 at 19:41 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> I have been wondering why hugin 2016.2.0~rc1+dfsg-2 (urgency=low) will
> be considered for testing migration after only 5 days and I think I found
> the reason.
>
> Testing has 2016.0.0+dfsg-1, which was followed by
> [2016-07-16] 2016.2.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
Hello,
I have been wondering why hugin 2016.2.0~rc1+dfsg-2 (urgency=low) will
be considered for testing migration after only 5 days and I think I found
the reason.
Testing has 2016.0.0+dfs
Hi,
Can we downgrade the move from openjpeg1.x to openjpeg2.x ? Still
keeping it as a release goal, but RC-critical?
I maintain (most of) the meteorology software, and the principal format
for weather data is GRIB2, which uses openjpeg as its primary
compression method. Until recently these all u
9 matches
Mail list logo
