On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Great. We can handle that for Stretch. You can send a ping to the bug reports
> saying that these are going to be RC for Stretch and that you will bump them
> after a week, and then do that.
Hi. The pings have been sent. Bugs of type "pending u
Your message dated Thu, 14 Jul 2016 20:19:00 +
with message-id <448b3131-71ea-c090-70e7-dc1da3398...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#830911: Britney git mirrors are broken by release.d.o
move
has caused the Debian Bug report #830911,
regarding Britney git mirrors are broken by release.d.
Processing control commands:
> block 830966 by -1
Bug #830966 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal
830966 was blocked by: 831336
830966 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 830966: 831343
--
830966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830966
831343: http://bugs.debia
Processing control commands:
> block 830966 by -1
Bug #830966 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal
830966 was not blocked by any bugs.
830966 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 830966: 831336
> affects -1 python-cryptography vtk6
Bug #831336 [src:python-cffi] python-cffi: Version
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 19:49 +0200, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I think debian should offer publicsuffix via stable-updates.
>
> publicsuffix ships a file that is updated semi-regularly to reflect the
> state of the network (a list of all DNS domains which members of t
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #831335 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
831335: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=831335
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 publicsuffix
Bug #831335 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1
Added indication that 831335 affects publicsuffix
--
831335: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=831335
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.de
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: affects -1 publicsuffix
I think debian should offer publicsuffix via stable-updates.
publicsuffix ships a file that is updated semi-regularly to reflect the
state of the ne
Ben Hutchings:
> [Now with valid addresses]
>
> On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 14:21 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> Currently the linux-latest source package builds a metapackage named
>> linux-image--dbg for each kernel flavour that has a debug
>> symbols package, with a dependency on that package.
>>
>>
Hi,
On 13/07/16 17:43, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> However, here we're asked to give advice on whether something is
>> source code. Is the question of what is the source code for a given
>> package technical, and thus within our remit?
>
> I think that's a na
Le 06/07/2016 à 22:59, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 06/07/16 13:35, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> New upstream gnustep-gui/back bumps S
[Now with valid addresses]
On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 14:21 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Currently the linux-latest source package builds a metapackage named
> linux-image--dbg for each kernel flavour that has a debug
> symbols package, with a dependency on that package.
>
> We're preparing to move t
Currently the linux-latest source package builds a metapackage named
linux-image--dbg for each kernel flavour that has a debug
symbols package, with a dependency on that package.
We're preparing to move the debug symbols packages to the debug
archive, but I'm not sure what to do with the metapacka
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 09:57:40PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 16:54 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:16:21PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> [...]
> > > Ack. Please go ahead.
> >
> > Hi, actually I was just made aware of a regression: includi
Hi,
I just did an archive rebuild with the gcc-defaults package from
experimental, to use GCC 6.
I filed quite a lot of bugs.
All logs (of failed builds) are available at
https://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2016/07/13/
Due to the large number of problems, there could be a couple of cases
wher
15 matches
Mail list logo