Hi Adam,
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 08:06:50AM +0200, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 18:22 +0200, Simon Kainz wrote:
> > Paul Wise found out that duck rund untrusted code from the current
> > directory as
> > well as the ./lib and ./lib/checks directo
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #829606 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package duck/0.7+deb8u1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
829606: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829606
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 18:22 +0200, Simon Kainz wrote:
> Paul Wise found out that duck rund untrusted code from the current directory
> as
> well as the ./lib and ./lib/checks directory. The attached patch fixes this
> issue.
+duck (0.7+deb8u1) jessie-security; urgency
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear Release Team,
The Security Team suggested fixing the TEMP-0678512-2E167C [1] security
issue through a point release.
The issue is a remotely triggerable crash due to stack ove
On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 16:01 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
[...]
> > > * rebuilt d-i to match that kernel
> >
> > You know there are patches around for that.
> >
> > > * X drivers
> >
> > I don't see backports for them.
>
> libdrm2: 2.4.68-1~bpo8+1
> libgl1-mesa-.*: 11.1.3-1~bpo8+1
> xserve
On 4 July 2016 at 09:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Steve McIntyre (2016-07-04):
>> There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some
>> other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release,
>> similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's *basically* ju
Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> > May I take the opportunity to ask you to also fix the 'stop' action from
> > the init script?
> >
> > We've been using this patch on the debian.org hosts for a year now.
> > Previously restarting the service would quite often result in no running
>
On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 14:01 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some
> other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release,
> similarly to what we did in the etch days.
As I recall, that added extra packages
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Paul Wise found out that duck rund untrusted code from the current directory as
well as the ./lib and ./lib/checks directory. The attached patch fixes this
issue.
-- System Inform
(Please keep me cc'd.)
Philipp Kern (2016-07-04):
> On 2016-07-04 15:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >Steve McIntyre (2016-07-04):
> >>There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some
> >>other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release,
> >>similarly to what w
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
With the update to Firefox 45 in Jessie, it once again caused
regressions in depending packages due to removed features. For
conkeror it's this time the removal of some specific synt
Your message dated Mon, 4 Jul 2016 16:08:52 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#829486: nmu: mod-wsgi_4.4.13-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #829486,
regarding nmu: mod-wsgi_4.4.13-0.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Mon, 4 Jul 2016 16:06:59 +0200
with message-id <260ce00b-cce7-6728-1bb0-4dbcfe6d2...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#829475: nmu: slurm-llnl_16.05.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #829475,
regarding nmu: slurm-llnl_16.05.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Mon, 4 Jul 2016 16:07:52 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#829483: nmu: scribus-ng_1.5.2+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #829483,
regarding nmu: scribus-ng_1.5.2+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some
> other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release,
> similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's *basically* just
> like a normal jes
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 02/07/16 17:00, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> ¡Hola!
>
> Sorry for the delay we have been working in adding some dropped upstream
> components.
>
> The list of source packages that we need to keep in unstable till the
> transition
> is finished are:
>
> akonadi
> ako
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #827755 [release.debian.org] transition: kdepim-16.04
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
827755: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827755
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 04/07/16 07:35, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2016-06-16 10:25, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> On 2016-06-16 02:12, Hector Oron wrote:
* mips64el (NEW)
- No DSA buildd (RT blocker)
>>>
>>> As far as I can see mips64el is using shared builds with mipsel port
>>> hardware, those machines are
On 2016-07-04 15:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steve McIntyre (2016-07-04):
There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some
other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release,
similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's *basically* just
like a normal jess
Hi,
Steve McIntyre (2016-07-04):
> There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some
> other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release,
> similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's *basically* just
> like a normal jessie release, but with a few key upd
Hey folks,
There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some
other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release,
similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's *basically* just
like a normal jessie release, but with a few key updates:
* backports kernel
* r
On 2016-07-03 10:30, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On 2016-07-02 21:58, Julien Puydt wrote:
I checked that these new ntl packages make it possible to build eclib,
flint, linbox, singular and flint-arb on an amd64 debian box, so I
don't expect any new problem.
Please go a
Processing changes file: xerces-c_3.1.1-5.1+deb8u3_allonly.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xerces-c_3.1.1-5.1+deb8u3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xerces-c_3.1.1-5.1+deb8u3_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xerces-c_3.1.1-5.1+deb8u3_armel.changes
ACCEPT
P
Control: reopen -1
On Sun, 2016-07-03 at 22:46 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Changes:
> ginkgocadx (3.8.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* New upstream release, Closes: #827061
Nope. That's the tracking bug for the whole transition, not whatever bug
might be specific to your
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #827061 {Done: Gert Wollny } [release.debian.org]
transition: openssl
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed i
Processing changes file: tomcat8_8.0.14-1+deb8u2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
26 matches
Mail list logo
