Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_kfreebsd-amd64.chan
Processing changes file: dpkg_1.17.27_amd64.changes
REJECT
Processing changes file: dpkg_1.17.27_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dpkg_1.17.27_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dpkg_1.17.27_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dpkg_1.17.27_i386.changes
AC
Processing changes file: chromium-browser_50.0.2661.94-1~deb8u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: chromium-browser_50.0.2661.94-1~deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: poppler_0.26.5-2+deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: poppler_0.26.5-2+deb8u1_arm64
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 822336 with 819758
Bug #822336 [src:perl] perl: Stable update taking patches from 5.20.3
822336 was not blocked by any bugs.
822336 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 822336: 819758
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Processing changes file: dpkg_1.16.18_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: botan1.10_1.10.8-2+deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: botan1.10_1.10.8-2+deb8u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: botan1.10_1.10.8-2+deb8u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: botan1.10_1.10.8-2+deb8u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Pro
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #818906 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package dpkg/1.16.18
Added tag(s) pending.
--
818906: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818906
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 00:23 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 20:36:32 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
> >
> > On Sun, 2016-03-27 at 12:07 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 18:07:46
Processing changes file: iceweasel_38.8.0esr-1~deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceweasel_38.8.0esr-1~deb8u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceweasel_38.8.0esr-1~deb8u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: iceweasel_38.8.0esr-1~deb8u1_armhf.changes
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #818908 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package dpkg/1.17.27
Added tag(s) pending.
--
818908: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818908
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2016-04-30 at 14:47 -0300, Giovani Ferreira wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 21:10:55 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 confirmed
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:40:37PM -0300, Giovani Augusto Ferreira wrote:
> > > The ext4magic has a misinterp
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #819284 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package ext4magic/0.3.2-2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
819284: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819284
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 00:24 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 20:34:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Apologies for the delays in getting back to you. Please go ahead.
>
> No problem! Uploaded now too.
Flagged for acceptance.
Regards,
Ad
On 02/05/16 18:25, Joachim Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=cgal says:
>
> 7 days old (needed 5 days)
> old binaries left on armhf: libcgal-qt5-11, libcgal-qt5-dev (from 4.7-4) (but
> ignoring cruft, so nevermind)
> Valid candidate
>
> (It is intended that these
Hi,
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=cgal says:
7 days old (needed 5 days)
old binaries left on armhf: libcgal-qt5-11, libcgal-qt5-dev (from 4.7-4) (but
ignoring cruft, so nevermind)
Valid candidate
(It is intended that these two binary packages are no longer built for armhf.)
Why does
Your message dated Mon, 2 May 2016 13:47:46 +0200
with message-id <57273e62.3010...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#823204: nmu: polymake_3.0r1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #823204,
regarding nmu: polymake_3.0r1-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #823002 [release.debian.org] transition: nvidia-cuda-toolkit 7.5
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
823002: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823002
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 29/04/16 22:43, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Forwarded:
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-nvidia-cuda-toolkit.html
>
> Hi,
>
> the n
Your message dated Mon, 2 May 2016 13:28:28 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#823206: gb: armhf kodi_16.1+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #823206,
regarding gb: armhf kodi_16.1+dfsg1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 10:17 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
[...]
> Build of kodi failed on buildd, but I have successfully rebuilt it
> on debomatic from the same source:
> http://debomatic-armhf.debian.net
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Build of kodi failed on buildd, but I have successfully rebuilt it
on debomatic from the same source:
http://debomatic-ar
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu polymake_3.0r1-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libbliss2"
bliss 0.73-1 started a mini-transition, only polymake is affected.
Andreas
Your message dated Mon, 2 May 2016 09:14:20 +0200
with message-id <5726fe4c.2040...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#821440: transition: ntfs-3g
has caused the Debian Bug report #821440,
regarding transition: ntfs-3g
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
23 matches
Mail list logo