Le dimanche 17 avril 2016 à 22:21 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> Control: tags -1 + jessie moreinfo
>
> On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 23:06 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> >
> > Please remove zotero-standalone-build from jessie. The package is
> > affected by
> > two RC bugs (#795343, #788277) whi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 821343 + jessie
Bug #821343 [release.debian.org] RM: zotero-standalone-build/4.0.22-1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #821343 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Control: tags -1 + jessie moreinfo
On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 23:06 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Please remove zotero-standalone-build from jessie. The package is affected by
> two RC bugs (#795343, #788277) which are not easy to address via a minimal
> patch.
>
> I'll try to provide a backport.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + jessie moreinfo
Bug #821343 [release.debian.org] RM: zotero-standalone-build/4.0.22-1
Added tag(s) jessie and moreinfo.
--
821343: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821343
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Dear Release Team,
Please remove zotero-standalone-build from jessie. The package is affected by
two RC bugs (#795343, #788277) which are not easy to address via a minimal
patch.
I'll try to pr
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 13:22 -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 09:30:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >Does a significant portion of the testsuite fail, or only a small part?
>
> Exactly one third of it: the same suite is run once for each
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Bug #819282 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package openldap/2.4.31-2+deb7u2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #819282 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package openldap/2.4.31-2+deb7u2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
819282: http://bugs.debian.org
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 09:30:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Does a significant portion of the testsuite fail, or only a small part?
Exactly one third of it: the same suite is run once for each of the backends
built, namely bdb, hdb, and mdb. The page size issue renders mdb totally
non-fu
On 2016-04-15 09:32:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 11/04/16 21:13, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > Control: forwarded -1
> > https://
Processing changes file: gtk+3.0_3.4.2-7+deb7u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie patch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
This update fixes:
- Regression when upgrading Linux to version 4.4+ if / or /usr is on
an NVMe device (#807000)
- Regression in version 0.119 if there are non-scripts (such
On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 17:48 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 01:16:42AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > By default, initramfs-tools includes various classes of driver modules
> > in the initramfs based on the directory they are installed in. In
> > particular, most block d
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 01:16:42AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> By default, initramfs-tools includes various classes of driver modules
> in the initramfs based on the directory they are installed in. In
> particular, most block drivers that don't belong to another subsystem
> such as SCSI are ins
Processing changes file: gpa_0.9.5-2+deb8u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xscreensaver_5.30-1+deb8u2_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xscreensaver_5.30-1+deb8u2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gtk+3.0_3.4.2-7+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gtk+3.0_3.4.2-7+deb7u1_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 07:17:33PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> It wasn't really very clear from your original report when the openjdk
> change happened, particularly given how recently #819375 was filed.
Sure. Because I didn't exactly know either. :)
That's exactly why I rechecked with a
Your message dated Sun, 17 Apr 2016 10:43:23 +0200
with message-id <57134cab.7090...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#819529: transition: libcrypto++
has caused the Debian Bug report #819529,
regarding transition: libcrypto++
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 16/04/16 19:36, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Perl 5.22.2 is to be released on Sunday 24th April or so.
> A release candidate is currently in experimental. T
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #821208 [release.debian.org] (mini)transition: perl 5.22.2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
821208: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821208
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing changes file: gtk+3.0_3.4.2-7+deb7u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gtk+3.0_3.4.2-7+deb7u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gpa_0.9.5-2+deb8u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
24 matches
Mail list logo
