Hi,
libfm-qt and pcmanfm-qt uploaded, this part is done.
> libfm-qt bumps its so version from 2 to 3, so we need to do the
> transition for it. The affected packages are listed in [0], and the
> following actions are needed:
>
> * lximage-qt needs binNMU.
Greetz Alf
Hi Julien,
Can you give a short update regarding the proposed
symfony/2.3.21+dfsg-4+deb8u3, fixing CVE-2016-1902?
It might be a bit late, but it would be great to have this fixed in 8.4,
which is about to be released.
Do you need any further information from us?
Greetings
Daniel
signature.as
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:27:20AM +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> unset DISPLAY. debian/rules already does that[1] and that fixed it for me
> so I wonder why you got it. ran make check manually or so?
Yes, 'make check' was issued
Processing changes file:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20130613+deb7u3.b1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20150422+deb8u3.b1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
An alternative is to have a multiarch library, and a non-multiarch development
package with the config script.
to me it makes no real sense to split the config file into a separate package,
specially because
1) it is in the same dev package on other linux distros
2) it was in the same dev packag
Debdiff attached.
hexchat-2.10.1-1+deb8u1.debdiff
Description: Binary data
On 2016-03-31 16:46, Jesse Rhodes wrote:
Here are the files for the update.
Please provide a debdiff against the existing source package in stable,
rather than the new source package itself.
Regards,
Adam
Here are the files for the update.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jesse Rhodes wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: jessie
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> Hi,
>
> I have prepared a patch for hexchat_2.10.1-1 in jessie for this issue,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
I have prepared a patch for hexchat_2.10.1-1 in jessie for this issue,
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/TEMP-0776609-026A07
It is also referenced in debian bug # 818
On 31/03/2016 15:59, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> (that package has a script libpng-config in usr/bin that contains arch-dep
>> information)
>> e.g.
>>
>> "libdir="${prefix}/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu""
> We shouldn't remove that file, I see it is used widely also by other distros.
One sol
Hi,
>(that package has a script libpng-config in usr/bin that contains arch-dep
>information)
>e.g.
>
>"libdir="${prefix}/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu""
We shouldn't remove that file, I see it is used widely also by other distros.
Instead, we can patch packages failing in configure script and add the re
Hi,
>- The change that libbpng-dev only recommends libpng16-devtools will cause
>some build failures, as several packages needs the devtool to be pulled in but
>do not declare a dependency on this.
>
the rationale for the change is that libpng-dev is Multiarch: same, while
devtools is providing
> Hi Gianfranco,
>
> Of course they can B-D on libpng16-devtools (but requires several sourceful
> uploads during the transition), but than we have that nasty SONAME back in the
> B-depdencies...
> Should we provide also a SONAME-neutral package name here?
Ähm, we have already a Provides: libpng-d
Hi Gianfranco,
I've just got a change to take a look at the new libpng package.
A remark:
- The change that libbpng-dev only recommends libpng16-devtools will cause
some build failures, as several packages needs the devtool to be pulled in but
do not declare a dependency on this.
Of course they
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:27:20AM +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> It seems the tests are OK. I got hundreds of lines like:
OK.
> [builddir]/libreoffice-5.1.2~rc1/solenv/gbuild/CppunitTest.mk:90:
> recipe for target
> '[builddir]/libreoffice-5.1.2~rc1/workdir/CppunitTest/cppcanvas_
16 matches
Mail list logo
