Processing changes file: cacti_0.8.8b+dfsg-8+deb8u4_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: glibc_2.19-18+deb8u3_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: glibc_2.19-18+deb8u3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: glibc_2.19-18+deb8u3_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #816023 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package glibc/2.19-18+deb8u4
Added tag(s) pending.
--
816023: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816023
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2016-02-28 at 16:20 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2016-02-26 21:17, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> >
> > On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 19:34 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > I would like to do an upload of glibc in jessie to fix a longst
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
I'd like to propose the following update (+ s/UNRELEASED/jessie/) to fix a
crash when running svn and using kwallet to store credentials.
$ debdiff subversion_1.8.10-6+deb8u{2,3}.ds
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 10:19:51PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 28/02/16 16:26, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 04:27:09PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> On 26/02/16 00:47, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> >>> Some of the failures above have already
Your message dated Sun, 28 Feb 2016 23:54:29 +0100
with message-id <56d37aa5.8040...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#810961: transition: libquvi
has caused the Debian Bug report #810961,
regarding transition: libquvi
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Hi,
see 812630/816228 (also discussed with Roland): Security team would to drop
jasper from stretch
(and eventually from the archive). Some high-profile users like gdk-pixbuf
already had it
dropped some time ago.
Ok with the release team? Could you please setup a removal/transition tracker
for
On 26/02/16 19:17, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Thanks, I have just uploaded the package.
binNMUs scheduled.
Emilio
On 28/02/16 16:26, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 04:27:09PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 26/02/16 00:47, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>>> Some of the failures above have already been fixed. Please binNMU the
>>> following packages:
>>
>> Scheduled.
>
> Thanks.
Your message dated Sun, 28 Feb 2016 22:11:05 +0100
with message-id <56d36269.9000...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#816165: nmu: samba_2:4.3.3+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #816165,
regarding nmu: samba_2:4.3.3+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 28 Feb 2016 21:48:16 +0100
with message-id <56d35d10.6030...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#813128: transition: openmpi
has caused the Debian Bug report #813128,
regarding transition: openmpi
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
On 28.02.2016 19:42, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> CVE-2014-2383 should actually be already fixed in 0.6.1+dfsg-1. Is
> that wrong?
>
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-2383
> https://bugs.debian.org/745619
Thats seems to be correct, upstream mentioned it on 0.6.2 as well.
Hi Markus,
Just one note:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 06:22:08PM +0100, Markus Frosch wrote:
> +php-dompdf (0.6.1+dfsg-2+deb8u1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
> +
> + * Non-maintainer upload.
> + * [22610bd] Add 0.6.2 hotfix patch (Closes: #813849)
> +
> +Fixes CVE:
> +* CVE-2014-2383
> +*
Hi Adam,
On 28.02.2016 18:29, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Well the RM's already been requested - see #816037. Could you please
> sort out between you what's happening, and let us know?
haven't seen that bug.
I decided to take over and ITA yesterday, so that was after David's request.
Since I still
Processing control commands:
> tags 816198 + moreinfo
Bug #816198 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package php-dompdf/0.6.1+dfsg-2
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #816198 to the same tags previously set
--
816198: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816198
Debian Bug Tracking S
Control: tags 816198 + moreinfo
On Sun, 2016-02-28 at 18:22 +0100, Markus Frosch wrote:
> Hey release team,
> I'd like to propose an update for jessie, that addresses 4 CVEs with
> php-dompdf.
>
> Related package bug is #813849
>
> Though php-dompdf is technically a leaf package, I'd prefer to s
Processing control commands:
> tags 816198 + moreinfo
Bug #816198 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package php-dompdf/0.6.1+dfsg-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
816037: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816037
816198: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816198
Debian Bug T
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hey release team,
I'd like to propose an update for jessie, that addresses 4 CVEs with
php-dompdf.
Related package bug is #813849
Though php-dompdf is technically a leaf package, I
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 04:27:09PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 26/02/16 00:47, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > Some of the failures above have already been fixed. Please binNMU the
> > following packages:
>
> Scheduled.
Thanks. All of the builds seem to have finished, but for some
On 2016-02-26 21:17, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 19:34 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I would like to do an upload of glibc in jessie to fix a longstanding
> > security issue with the pt_chown helper (CVE-2013-2207).
> [...]
> > I would therefo
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu samba_2:4.3.3+dfsg-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against ldb 1.1.26."
samba binaries have strict dependencies on the upstream version of
libldb1 used at compile time, making samba-lib
21 matches
Mail list logo
