On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 23:01:24 -0500 Simon Ruggier wrote:
> Also, my own testing seems to show that the certificate chain issue is
> still present in the latest 1.0.1 release (as I commented on 813468), so
> adopting the latest 1.0.2 release seems like the only reasonable
> alternative.
As I commen
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 06:44:52PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 24/02/16 11:38, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
[...]
> > I would like to add support for building for ruby2.3 in unstable. That
> > means uploading the version of ruby-defaults in experimental
Processing changes file: dansguardian_2.10.1.1-5+b1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dansguardian_2.10.1.1-5+b1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dansguardian_2.10.1.1-5+b1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dansguardian_2.10.1.1-5+b1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gajim_0.16-1+deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xerces-c_3.1.1-5.1+deb8u1_allonly.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xerces-c_3.1.1-5.1+deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xerces-c_3.1.1-5.1+deb8u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Process
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 25/02/16 22:10, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear release team,
>
> The new release of cfitsio changes the soname version from 2 to 4. The
> version 3
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #815931 [release.debian.org] transition: cfitsio
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
815931: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815931
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear release team,
The new release of cfitsio changes the soname version from 2 to 4. The
version 3 has been skipped given some distributions including Debian
where using this to provide
On 25/02/16 18:50, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu tesseract_3.04.01-3 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild in a clean sid
> environment"
>
> libicu52 and friends ... again ...
>
>
>
Processing changes file: unbound_1.4.22-3+deb8u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnupg_1.4.18-7+deb8u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnupg_1.4.18-7+deb8u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: osmo_0.2.12-1+deb8u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: s3ql_2.11.1+dfsg-3_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes fil
Processing changes file: conkeror_1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1+deb8u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: conkeror_1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1+deb8u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: conkeror_1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1+deb8u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: conkeror_1.0~~
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu tesseract_3.04.01-3 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild in a clean sid
environment"
libicu52 and friends ... again ...
nmu openalpr_2.2.3-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libtess
Processing changes file: conkeror_1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1+deb8u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: conkeror_1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1+deb8u1_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
Processing control commands:
> unblock 650601 by 810173
Bug #650601 [release.debian.org] transition: libpng 1.6
650601 was blocked by: 642265 649557 809958 809859 741901 741891 809898 809908
810186 636998 809947 742560 809862 662476 809885 809833 636004 810207 649798
809951 742655 809896 810208
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 650601 with 650581
Bug #650601 [release.debian.org] transition: libpng 1.6
650601 was blocked by: 662334 810192 809943 809873 809899 809888 662550 809906
809951 809865 809874 809905 809836 809871 809958 662530 810185 662492 648131
649798
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 650601 with 810206
Bug #650601 [release.debian.org] transition: libpng 1.6
650601 was blocked by: 662443 809950 642265 662523 810208 810191 810193 650563
649552 810177 810206 809881 649546 810188 809872 809866 809887 809935 648129
809946
Processing control commands:
> unblock 650601 by -1
Bug #650601 [release.debian.org] transition: libpng 1.6
650601 was blocked by: 810095 662465 662566 662273 810179 662476 809881 662411
662334 810201 810190 662444 650581 809952 741901 809863 810168 809956 810183
809867 662522 662550 649546 8102
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 650601 with 810194
Bug #650601 [release.debian.org] transition: libpng 1.6
650601 was blocked by: 809951 635946 809954 648126 809867 809921 662476 809868
809836 809905 635704 809882 662523 649798 809913 809942 662437 741894 648129
741901
Your message dated Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:33:30 +0100
with message-id <56cef49a.1030...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#815887: nmu: trilinos_12.4.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #815887,
regarding nmu: trilinos_12.4.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu trilinos_12.4.2-1 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild in a current sid
environment."
This sat in NEW for some months ...
Andreas
Processing changes file: chromium-browser_48.0.2564.116-1~deb8u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: chromium-browser_48.0.2564.116-1~deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: conkeror_1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1+deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnupg_1.4.18
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2016-02-22 19:11, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2016-02-22 0:09, Robert Edmonds wrote:
>diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
>index af91f28..2c6d115 100644
>--- a/debian/changelog
>+++ b/debian/changelog
>@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
>+unbound (1.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #815517 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package unbound/1.4.22-3+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
815517: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815517
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #815469 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package osmo/0.2.12-1+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
815469: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815469
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2015-12-05 19:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 17:16 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
https://bugs.debian.org/787046 shows a reasonable patch from noodles
(imported from GnuPG upstream) that makes gnupg 1.4.x behave se
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #803199 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package gnupg/1.4.18-7
Added tag(s) pending.
--
803199: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803199
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2016-02-21 20:03, Markus Koschany wrote:
Am 21.02.2016 um 20:22 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 19:46 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
I would like to update Osmo in Jessie because the internal data
backup
function on i386
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2016-02-22 16:52, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
On Feb 20 2016, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 13:46:54 -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
On Aug 29 2015, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 19:29 -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> Would it be acceptible
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #796947 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package s3ql/2.11.1+dfsg-2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
796947: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796947
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #798404 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package
conkeror/1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
798404: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798404
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 2016-02-23 20:31, Axel Beckert wrote:
Hi,
Julien Cristau wrote:
> diff -Nru conkeror-1.0~~pre-1+git141025/debian/changelog
conkeror-1.0~~pre-1+git141025/debian/changelog
> --- conkeror-1.0~~pre-1+git141025/debian/changelog 2014-10-25
18:37:02.0 +0200
> +
31 matches
Mail list logo