Bug#765639: affecting more and more people

2016-02-19 Thread Simon Ruggier
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:59:46 + "Adam D. Barratt" < a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 19:46 +0100, Christian Beer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > there are more people reporting that they are directly affected by a bug > > in the Debian Jessie openssl package where it doesn't check

Limited involvement for a time

2016-02-19 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Just to let you know: given heavy workload and given recent events at home, I won't be spending the usual amount of time on Debian things (d-i related or not), for a time. Linux 4.4 only reached unstable a few days ago, and will probably need a little time to mature there, so it's not like we

Bug#814544: wheezy-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb7u1

2016-02-19 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2016-02-19 05:56:27 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > The sparc build has now failed three times, across two different builds. And why did mips pass? Isn't mips the difficult one? The patch attached is a simplified version of what I had on smetana during testing. I would give it another try to

Bug#815153: transition: libvigraimpex

2016-02-19 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 19/02/16 21:12, Daniel Stender wrote: > On 19.02.2016 21:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Control: tags -1 moreinfo >> >> On 19/02/16 13:39, Daniel Stender wrote: >>> However, libvigraimpex currently doesn't build on all official supported >>> archs, >>> I'm on this to get solved and upload

Bug#815153: transition: libvigraimpex

2016-02-19 Thread Daniel Stender
On 19.02.2016 21:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 19/02/16 13:39, Daniel Stender wrote: >> However, libvigraimpex currently doesn't build on all official supported >> archs, >> I'm on this to get solved and upload one more package in experimental soon. > > Let

Bug#815153: transition: libvigraimpex

2016-02-19 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 19/02/16 13:39, Daniel Stender wrote: > However, libvigraimpex currently doesn't build on all official supported > archs, > I'm on this to get solved and upload one more package in experimental soon. Let us know when that is solved. Bonus points if you also fix that

Processed: Re: Bug#815153: transition: libvigraimpex

2016-02-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #815153 [release.debian.org] transition: libvigraimpex Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 815153: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815153 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#814544: wheezy-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb7u1

2016-02-19 Thread Scott Kitterman
On February 19, 2016 6:22:19 AM PST, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: >On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 05:56 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 22:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> > Control: tags -1 + pending >> > >> > On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 22:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> [...] >>

Bug#814544: wheezy-pu: package clamav/0.99+dfsg-0+deb7u1

2016-02-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 05:56 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 22:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + pending > > > > On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 22:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > [...] > > > Thanks. Both clamav and libclamunrar source uploads are done. I'll

Processed: bug 813916 is forwarded to https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html

2016-02-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 813916 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html Bug #813916 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html' from 'https://release.

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

2016-02-19 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote: Package: release.debian.org For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to the recently re

Bug#815153: transition: libvigraimpex

2016-02-19 Thread Daniel Stender
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello, I want to register a transition of libvigraimpex[1] because there are changes in the ABI. The new version of the package has been uploaded to experimental now, it's 1.10.0+git201

Re: RM: ismrmrd [armhf hppa] -- RoM; FTBFS

2016-02-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2016-02-19 9:10, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: Meanwhile, may I ask you guys to allow the package to transition to testing by removing the existing ismrmrd binary packages for both architectures. You'll need to ask the FTP Team to remove them from unstable, via a bug against ftp.debian.org. Re

RM: ismrmrd [armhf hppa] -- RoM; FTBFS

2016-02-19 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Dear release team, Since enabling the testsuite for the ismrmrd source package, a few architectures started to FTBFS, mostly due to usage of non-portable code in the implementation of the library and its corresponding testsuite. I managed to fix most of them in subsequent uploads and iterations