Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
The version of amavisd-new Debian I just uploaded to unstable has a fix
that I believe resolves #812325 which can prevent amavisd-new from
failing to detect viruses correctly.
Belo
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 08:01:13PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > For stretch, I would very much like to choose a kernel version for
> > stretch that gets longterm maintenance by Greg Kroah-Hartman. That
> > lasts 2 years from release, after which someone else (maybe me
On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 20:01 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > For stretch, I would very much like to choose a kernel version for
> > stretch that gets longterm maintenance by Greg Kroah-Hartman. That
> > lasts 2 years from release, after which someone else (maybe me) can
>
Processing changes file: pam_1.1.8-3.1+deb8u1+b1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pam_1.1.8-3.1+deb8u1+b1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pam_1.1.8-3.1+deb8u1+b1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pam_1.1.8-3.1+deb8u1+b1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
An uncoordinated transition has been started by the last proftpd-dfsg
upload (new upstream version fixing a CVE):
proftpd-abi-1.3.5 ==> proftpd-abi-1.3.5a
Since this is a virtual packag
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 22:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 15:28 -0800, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> > Due to some kind of mistake in my amd64 build environment (details being
> > tracked down in #812566) the amd64 build
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #812821 [release.debian.org] nmu: pam_1.1.8-3.1+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
812821: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812821
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi Adam
Uff, well that was really unintended, I'm sorry. I must have picked the
wrong chroot to build.
I'll rebuild for unstable and upload again.
Sorry for the trouble.
Regards
Tom
On 28.01.2016 18:23, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that there's a texstudio 2.10.6+debian-1 uploa
Hi,
I noticed that there's a texstudio 2.10.6+debian-1 upload in the
proposed-updates-new queue. I'm assuming that this was unintentional,
given that stable currently has version 2.8.4, and the changelog says:
texstudio (2.10.6+debian-1) unstable; urgency=medium
However, the .changes fil
Processing changes file: texstudio_2.10.6+debian-1_amd64.changes
REJECT
Norvald H. Ryeng wrote:
> >Norvald H. Ryeng wrote:
> >>Tell us exactly what you want, in detail. If you don't then I don't
> >>think your position is reasonable.
>
> I don't recognize those words, and it's not in the style I usually express
> myself. Are you paraphrasing?
Sorry, that was Robie Ba
Hi,
jumping in here, cause I think this one is really uncalled for:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 08:30:09PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> And apart from sponsoring Debian packaging work, Oracle seems
> conspicuously missing from:
> http://debconf16.debconf.org/sponsors.html
So is about everybody
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 05:25:22 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Can we fix this once and for all, or do we have to rely on hints to
> migrate netcdf packages every time?
>
Yes, please feel free to get the reverse deps of the remaining cruft
fixed or removed.
Cheers,
Julien
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
I would like to request a transition for the latest version of nfft from
experimental to unstable.
Some API breaking changes were introduced from in version 3.3.0 and
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 21:30:09 +0100, Steven Chamberlain
wrote:
And apart from sponsoring Debian packaging work, Oracle seems
conspicuously missing from:
http://debconf16.debconf.org/sponsors.html
http://debconf15.debconf.org/
https://www.debian.org/mirror/sponsors
https://www.freexian.com/en/s
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 650601 with 810204
Bug #650601 [release.debian.org] transition: libpng 1.6
650601 was blocked by: 809921 810167 810189 809859 662411 662473 650489 810168
809958 662523 809892 810208 809910 810173 809889 809897 648129 810171 810191
809955
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
This fixes a serious bug which stops a transitional package from being
installed on jessie:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798712
The debdiff is very simple, and
I've now filed also a jessie-pu for this fix: https://bugs.debian.org/812990
DS
--
4096R/DF5182C8
46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8
LPI certified Linux admin (LPI000329859 64mz6f7kt4)
http://www.danielstender.com/blog/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 812990 jessie-pu: package gummi/0.6.5-3+deb8u2
Bug #812990 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package gummi/0.6.5-3+deb8u1
Changed Bug title to 'jessie-pu: package gummi/0.6.5-3+deb8u2' from 'jessie-pu:
package gummi/0.6.5-3+deb8u1'
> thanks
d the package with Sbuild against stable [3]. Please see the
attached debdiff for the whole set of changes.
Thank you very much,
DS
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/812577 (gummi: relative import paths couldn't be
used)
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/812881 (wheezy-pu: package gummi/0.6.3-1.2+deb7u2)
libvigraimpex has been updated an don't FTBFS anymore (on most archs so far).
BTW there is a test failure on test/impex which puts out some EXR related error
[1]
(I've set this test to be failsafe). It would be interesting if this maybe
vanishes with
the more recent openEXR ...
DS
[1] https://
The dhparam thing is really about a default that if you generate
DH parameters that it defaults to 2048 instead of 1024. This
shouldn't break anything itself, nor do I know of any other
software that would get broken by this.
Apparently Java 6 and 7 will fail to handshake if a server tries to us
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
somebody reported to ftpmaster@ that two mipsel binaries are corrupt:
ceph-test-dbg_0.80.11-1_mipsel.deb and qgis-dbg_2.8.4+dfsg-1_mips64el.deb
> $ dpkg-deb --extract ./ceph-test-dbg_0.
23 matches
Mail list logo
