Bug#812155: release.debian.org: Patch to make heidi output optional

2016-01-20 Thread Robert Bruce Park
Package: release.debian.org Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney Hi, I'm doing some work on britney as used by ubuntu and I've made Heidi output optional as we were not using it in all cases, in the hopes of saving some time/disk space. P

Processed: Re: module 'subprocess' has no attribute 'mswindows'

2016-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 sid stretch Bug #812072 [python3-cmd2] module 'subprocess' has no attribute 'mswindows' Added tag(s) sid and stretch. > block 810136 with -1 Bug #810136 [release.debian.org] transition: python3-defaults (python3.5 as default python3) 810136 was not blocked by

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2016-01-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: ecryptfs-utils_99-1+deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ecryptfs-utils_99-1+deb7u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ecryptfs-utils_99-1+deb7u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ecryptfs-utils_99-1+deb7u1_i386.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2016-01-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: tomcat7_7.0.28-4+deb7u3_amd64.changes ACCEPT

Bug#761128: Any news on the auto-oce transition?

2016-01-20 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Hi, it would be nice to get OCE 0.17 into stretch at some point. Would it make sense to upload this version to experimental and check/fix build problems esp. on arm64, mips, and ppc64el? I built 0.17 (source package from Ubuntu) and compiled freecad 0.16 (again .dsc from Ubuntu) against it on am

Re: [Britney] RfC/RfR: Rewrite age requirement implementation

2016-01-20 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 22:42:44 +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > I have created a patch to make Britney track package ageing with higher > resolution. The patch is attached along with the patch for the test suite. > > Please review the patch(es) and let me know if you have any concerns >

Processed: Re: Bug#812113: transition: libpodofo

2016-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #812113 [release.debian.org] transition: libpodofo Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 812113: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812113 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#812113: transition: libpodofo

2016-01-20 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 20/01/16 18:54, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libpodofo.html > > > I would like to update the very

Bug#811274: marked as done (nmu: mmpong smc)

2016-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2016 20:12:42 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#811274: nmu: mmpong smc has caused the Debian Bug report #811274, regarding nmu: mmpong smc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#812113: transition: libpodofo

2016-01-20 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libpodofo.html I would like to update the very old version of libpodofo that we currently ship. I uploaded a package to experimenta

Processed: transition: libpodofo

2016-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libpodofo.html Bug #812113 [release.debian.org] transition: libpodofo Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libpodofo.html'. -- 812113: http://bugs.debian.org