Processing changes file: fuse-exfat_0.9.7-2+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: fuse-exfat_0.9.7-2+deb7u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: fuse-exfat_0.9.7-2+deb7u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: fuse-exfat_0.9.7-2+deb7u1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Proce
Processing changes file: pam_1.1.8-3.1+deb8u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pam_1.1.8-3.1+deb8u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pam_1.1.8-3.1+deb8u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pam_1.1.8-3.1+deb8u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi
I'd like to request a transition for openexr (and ilmbase).
Ben file:
title = "openexr";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libopenexr6v5" | .depends ~ "libopenexr6";
is_good = .depends ~ "l
On 2016-01-09 20:11, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I'd like to request a transition slot for ilmbase/openexr. Is this a
good time ? Versions in exp are in good shapes.
Thanks
Please file a bug against release.debian.org, mail requests get lost.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
I'd like to request a transition slot for ilmbase/openexr. Is this a
good time ? Versions in exp are in good shapes.
Thanks
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
curlftpfs is misbuilt on 64-bit architectures due to a missing prototype
for getpass() (the implicit prototype causes a pointer-to-integer
truncation), see #795879
My proposed fix i
On 2016-01-09 16:00, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I've flagged both uploads for rejection, as requested, but dinstall is
> currently running so it could take a short while.
Thanks, cleaned packages uploaded.
Andreas
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 11:46:01AM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Hi,
> Personally I'm in favour of following the openssl point updates and I'd
> like to add an additional data point to the discussion:
>
> CVE-2015-3196 was already fixed as a plain bugfix in an earlier point
> release, but the
Processing changes file: fuse-exfat_0.9.7-2+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: git_1.7.10.4-1+wheezy2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: git_1.7.10.4-1+wheezy2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: git_1.7.10.4-1+wheezy2_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing c
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Niels Thykier (2016-01-09):
>> Theppitak Karoonboonyanan:
>> > unblock fonts-tlwg/1:0.6.2-1
>>
>> I will leave the decision to Cyril. :)
>
> I'd rather wait until the installation images have been successfully
> built and tested before lift
Processing changes file:
libapache-mod-fastcgi_2.4.7~0910052141-1.1+deb8u1_multi.changes
REJECT
Processing changes file: madfuload_1.2-4+deb8u1_multi.changes
REJECT
Processing changes file: owncloud_7.0.4+dfsg-4~deb8u4_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: pam_1.1.8-3.1+deb8u1_amd64.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #810130 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package owncloud/7.0.4+dfsg-4~deb8u4
Added tag(s) pending.
--
810130: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810130
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 21:45 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> […]
> > Please go ahead.
>
> Accepted in -new, thanks.
Flagged for acceptance into p-u.
Regards,
Adam
On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 15:04 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2016-01-09 14:53, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > This was uploaded, but the diff contains
> >
> > li64| 181
> >
> > which appears to be the result of running lintian on the packages. Is
> > that a build artefact or
Niels Thykier (2016-01-09):
> Theppitak Karoonboonyanan:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Please unblock package fonts-tlwg
> >
> > fonts-tlwg has been upgraded with new upstream version in Sid for
On 2016-01-09 14:53, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> This was uploaded, but the diff contains
>
> li64| 181
>
> which appears to be the result of running lintian on the packages. Is
> that a build artefact or cruft from the local environment?
oops, local cruft, please reject both
On Fri, 2016-01-01 at 16:32 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 07:08 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > libapache-mod-fastcgi FTBFS in jessie due to missing libtool.
> > The fix is trivial: switching B-D from libtool to libtool-bin.
>
> Please g
On Fri, 2016-01-01 at 17:44 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control; tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sat, 2015-12-05 at 23:41 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > madfuload FTBFS in jessie due to automake 1.14. Switching from
> > 'autoreconf -f' to 'autoreconf -fi' is sufficient to install the missing
>
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package fonts-tlwg
>
> fonts-tlwg has been upgraded with new upstream version in Sid for a while,
> and it should be safe for d-i.
>
>
2016-01-09 12:07 GMT+01:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
> I won't know until the package gets to 5/5 and britney tries to migrate it,
> but
> some potential issues:
>
> netpipe-mpich2 depends on mpich2
I will NMU it.
> espresso/s390x failed to build
I was trying to fix it, but it looks like it fail
Your message dated Sat, 9 Jan 2016 12:20:39 +0100
with message-id <5690ed07.2060...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#810333: nmu: open-vm-tools_2:10.0.5-3227872-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #810333,
regarding nmu: open-vm-tools_2:10.0.5-3227872-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package fonts-tlwg
fonts-tlwg has been upgraded with new upstream version in Sid for a while,
and it should be safe for d-i.
I'm preparing a new revision with major change (
Your message dated Sat, 9 Jan 2016 12:10:05 +0100
with message-id <5690ea8d.7040...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#810341: nmu:
libatteanx-store-memorytriplestore-perl_0.001~20150811-1 gdal_2.0.1+dfsg-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #810341,
regarding nmu: libatteanx-store-memorytrip
Your message dated Sat, 9 Jan 2016 12:09:08 +0100
with message-id <5690ea54.7060...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#810334: nmu: libgetdata_0.9.0-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #810334,
regarding nmu: libgetdata_0.9.0-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On 08/01/16 12:30, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hi Emilio,
>
> it looks like almost all problems were resolved. Could you please check,
> what should be done to finish this transition?
I won't know until the package gets to 5/5 and britney tries to migrate it, but
some potential issues:
netpipe-mpich2
Your message dated Sat, 9 Jan 2016 11:52:14 +0100
with message-id <5690e65e.7070...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#809208: nmu: libwibble_1.1-1 for mips64el
has caused the Debian Bug report #809208,
regarding nmu: libwibble_1.1-1 for mips64el
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
26 matches
Mail list logo
