Bug#807280: jessie-pu: package keepassx/0.4.3+dfsg-0.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear Release Team, I'm writing you to request approving my recent upload of keepassx_0.4.3+dfsg-0.1+deb8u1. This update addresses CVE-2015-8378/#791858. I'm copying Moritz, since he

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:22:13PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 03/12/15 13:15, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 07:08:55PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >>> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:09:09AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > >>> I've tested the package

Processed: block 796345 with 804590

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 796345 with 804590 Bug #796345 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.22 796345 was blocked by: 802939 804603 790532 787493 787468 799118 795127 796923 807038 787450 787453 788073 796345 was blocking: 798309 801659 801660 801661 801662 801

Processed: block 796345 with 795127

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 796345 with 795127 Bug #796345 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.22 796345 was blocked by: 807038 802939 804603 788073 799118 787453 787468 787450 796923 790532 787493 796345 was blocking: 798309 801659 801660 801661 801662 801663 Add

Bug#804246: closed by Andreas Tille (Bug#804246: fixed in ampliconnoise 1.29-3)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Andreas, I've reopened the gsl transition bugreport, which you probably didn't mean to close. The bugreport for ampliconnoise is #807177. Kind Regards, Bas - -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1

Processed: Re: Bug#804246 closed by Andreas Tille (Bug#804246: fixed in ampliconnoise 1.29-3)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 804246 Bug #804246 {Done: Andreas Tille } [release.debian.org] transition: gsl 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No lo

Bug#804246: marked as done (transition: gsl)

Your message dated Sun, 06 Dec 2015 21:34:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#804246: fixed in ampliconnoise 1.29-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #804246, regarding transition: gsl to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Re: 8.3 planning

On 12/04/2015 01:12 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 05:43:54PM +, Adam Barratt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We're a tad overdue for the 8.3 point release and with the holiday >> period coming up, getting one done in December looks like a bit of a >> push. >> >> On that basis, lookin

Processed: block 796345 with 804603

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 796345 with 804603 Bug #796345 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.22 796345 was blocked by: 790532 807038 799118 787450 796923 802939 787493 788073 787468 787453 796345 was blocking: 798309 801659 801660 801661 801662 801663 Added bloc

Bug#804246: transition: gsl

On 6 December 2015 at 17:01, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: | On 03-12-15 19:11, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: | > On 03/12/15 19:07, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: | >> Because libgsl0-dev is not a transitional package to pull in libgsl-dev | >> and libgsl2, all gsl rdeps need to update their build d

Processed: Blocking bugs for GSL transition

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 804246 by 807240 Bug #804246 [release.debian.org] transition: gsl 804246 was blocked by: 805801 805823 807233 807221 805842 807200 807226 807205 807202 807210 807212 805749 807224 807232 807196 804498 807191 806981 807193 805844 805835 807

Bug#804246: transition: gsl

On 03-12-15 19:11, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 03/12/15 19:07, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> Because libgsl0-dev is not a transitional package to pull in libgsl-dev >> and libgsl2, all gsl rdeps need to update their build dependencies >> before rebuilding with GSL 2. This affected siril (0

Processed: Blocking bugs

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 804246 by 807237 Bug #804246 [release.debian.org] transition: gsl 804246 was blocked by: 806830 807235 807202 807203 807194 804498 807178 805746 804499 807209 806834 807217 807233 807191 807232 805844 807205 807207 807236 807225 807186 807

Processed: Blocking bugs

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 804246 by 807236 Bug #804246 [release.debian.org] transition: gsl 804246 was blocked by: 807197 807202 807230 807196 807221 807232 805842 804497 804501 807233 805814 807176 805799 807225 805823 807204 807215 807218 807173 807207 807212 804

Bug#805634: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] tbl: auto-updating & apparmor

Hi, On Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2015, intrigeri wrote: > Sorry I gave the impression I was going to do it, this wasn't my > intention. I didn't test it yet. Like any torbrowser-launcher > 0.2.2 + AppArmor user I will have to go through it for the next Tor > Browser update (December 15). Expect bug rep

Processed: Blocking bugs

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 804246 by 807233 Bug #804246 [release.debian.org] transition: gsl 804246 was blocked by: 805749 807213 807197 807176 805746 807221 805814 807215 807217 805834 804496 807207 804502 805835 807200 804497 805842 807190 806833 807219 807205 807

Processed: Blocking bugs

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 804246 by 807232 Bug #804246 [release.debian.org] transition: gsl 804246 was blocked by: 807223 804501 807177 807212 807216 807192 805823 807228 807227 805818 807182 807220 807180 806834 805746 804502 807186 807184 807230 805829 807222 807

Processed: Blocking bugs for GSL transition

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 804246 by 807217 807218 807219 807220 807221 807222 807223 807224 Bug #804246 [release.debian.org] transition: gsl 804246 was blocked by: 807210 807182 805749 804501 807194 805844 807187 807176 807177 804499 806830 807214 805801 807200 8057

Processed: Blocking bugs for GSL transition

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 804246 by 807197 807198 807199 807200 807202 807203 807204 807205 Bug #804246 [release.debian.org] transition: gsl 804246 was blocked by: 806981 806833 804498 807193 807194 805829 805832 806835 805841 807195 805835 807190 805842 804499 8071

Processed: Blocking bugs for GSL transition

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 804246 by 807184 807186 807187 807189 807190 807191 Bug #804246 [release.debian.org] transition: gsl 804246 was blocked by: 805749 807178 804498 807173 805740 805748 805814 805842 804501 805799 806981 806830 806835 805819 805829 807180 8045

Processed: Blocking bugs for GSL transition

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 804246 by 807176 807177 807178 807180 807182 Bug #804246 [release.debian.org] transition: gsl 804246 was blocked by: 806834 805794 805842 806833 805814 805841 805835 804499 805824 805819 807173 805748 805799 805829 804496 804501 806830 8057

Bug#807128: marked as done (nmu: gcc-5_5.3.0-3)

Your message dated Sun, 6 Dec 2015 14:16:36 +0100 with message-id <56643534.6090...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#807128: gcc-5-base: Differing changelog.Debian.gz between :i386 and :amd64 has caused the Debian Bug report #807128, regarding nmu: gcc-5_5.3.0-3 to be marked as done. This mea

Processed: Fix blocked by tamuanova (#806835)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 804246 by 807173 Bug #804246 [release.debian.org] transition: gsl 804246 was blocked by: 804495 805749 804500 804502 805844 805746 805740 805841 805823 805794 806830 805842 805832 804496 804498 805799 806834 805818 806835 805814 806981 804

Bug#804208: jessie-pu: package fuse-exfat/1.1.0-2+deb8u1

On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 07:13:42PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi Adam, > Please go ahead. Uploaded a minute ago. Cheers, Sven

Bug#805634: tbl: auto-updating & apparmor

Hi, Holger Levsen wrote (06 Dec 2015 10:17:48 GMT) : > On Freitag, 20. November 2015, intrigeri wrote: >> Holger Levsen wrote (20 Nov 2015 13:10:46 GMT) : >> > * Tor Browser Lanucher no longer attempts to auto-update, now that >> Is Tor Browser's self-upgrade feature compatible with the AppArmor >

Bug#765639: Bug#802159: New OpenSSL upstream version

Hi, Personally I'm in favour of following the openssl point updates and I'd like to add an additional data point to the discussion: CVE-2015-3196 was already fixed as a plain bugfix in an earlier point release, but the security impact was only noticed later on, so following the point updates would

Bug#805634: tbl: auto-updating & apparmor (Re: Bug#805634: jessie-pu: torbrowser-launcher/0.2.2-2~deb8u1

Hi intrigeri, On Freitag, 20. November 2015, intrigeri wrote: > Holger Levsen wrote (20 Nov 2015 13:10:46 GMT) : > > * Tor Browser Lanucher no longer attempts to auto-update, now that > Is Tor Browser's self-upgrade feature compatible with the AppArmor > profiles shipped by the package? It doesn't