Hi!
Version 1.3.8-1 of cgsi-gsoap has been a valid candidate for migration
to testing for some time, but hasn't done the migration yet. The "more
excuses" page says migrating the package would make four binary
packages built from the lcgdm source package uninstallable.
lcgdm in testing is at vers
Your message dated Wed, 9 Sep 2015 23:18:30 +0100
with message-id <20150909221830.ga31...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#791245: projectm: library transition may be needed
when GCC 5 is the default
has caused the Debian Bug report #791245,
regarding transition: projectm (GC
Your message dated Wed, 9 Sep 2015 23:14:32 +0100
with message-id <20150909221432.ga31...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#791030: exiv2: library transition may be needed when
GCC 5 is the default
has caused the Debian Bug report #791030,
regarding exiv2: library transition m
Your message dated Wed, 9 Sep 2015 23:13:11 +0100
with message-id <20150909221311.ga31...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#790985: bobcat: library transition may be needed when
GCC 5 is the default
has caused the Debian Bug report #790985,
regarding transition: bobcat (libbob
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:35:08AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> The build failed because there is now a .gitignore in the repository.
> According to dpkg-source it is an unexpected upstream change and it
> fails the build. Can the .gitignore be removed?
Oh, I assumed git-buildpackage would
The build failed because there is now a .gitignore in the repository.
According to dpkg-source it is an unexpected upstream change and it
fails the build. Can the .gitignore be removed?
Regards,
-Roberto
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:03:56AM +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> Oops, didn't change that
+++ Adam D. Barratt [2015-08-31 21:17 +0100]:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Sat, 2015-08-22 at 23:16 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > The emdebian-archive-keyring package in jessie contains the old key
> > which was revoked when the emdebian server was compromised in November
> > 2014.
>
> Well, i
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:51:43PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:55:36AM +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> > user release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > usertag 796711 + transition
> > usertag 796711 + patch
> > block 796711 by 790756
> > reassign 796711 release.deb
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 10:36:33PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > So do I start with an soname change and upload that to
> > experimental?
>
> Yes please.
So that has passed the new queue now. Please let me know when I
can start this in unstable.
Kurt
Oops, didn't change that before I committed. No, this is for unstable for the
transition.
Thanks,
Daniel
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 04:43:35AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Of course. The upload is meant for experimental like -3. Correct?
>
> Regards,
>
> -Roberto
>
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015
Of course. The upload is meant for experimental like -3. Correct?
Regards,
-Roberto
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 09:33:03AM +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 04:08:25AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > Do you want me to go ahead with uploading -3 as is then?
>
> No need, c
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 04:08:25AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Do you want me to go ahead with uploading -3 as is then?
No need, could you just git-buildpackage build and tag -4 ?
Thanks,
Daniel
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 07:48:32AM +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at
Do you want me to go ahead with uploading -3 as is then?
Regards,
-Roberto
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 07:48:32AM +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:35:14PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > Daniel,
> >
> > I just built this and was going to upload for you, but I noticed t
13 matches
Mail list logo
