All (both) reverse-build deps rebuilt.
Scott K
On 14037 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> We're somewhat overdue for both 8.2 and 7.9 now (in that order). Some
> potential September dates:
> 5/6th - okay for me
> 12/13th - the 12th doesn't work for me until at least mid-afternoon
> 19th/20th - looks okay
> 26th/27th - looks okay
All dates d
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi RT!
The akonadi package in stable suffers from a bug that makes it leaks
files thus filling the hard drive with useless data.
The patch that I'm attaching has been in testing fo
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 20:23 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 11:20 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> > > We're somewhat overdue for both 8.2 and 7.9 now (in that order). Some
> > > potential September dates:
> > >
> > > 5/6th - okay for me
> >
> >
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 20:10 +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> Guido Günther wrote (20 Aug 2015 11:57:36 GMT) :
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 04:53:32PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >> I have to admit that I'm also confused by the patch
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #796088 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package libvirt/1.2.9-9+deb8u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
796088: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796088
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> block 230990 by -1
Bug #230990 [ncurses] 5th button (mouse wheel) support
Bug #476394 [ncurses] support mouse wheel
230990 was blocked by: 788610
230990 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 230990: 796835
476394 was blocked by: 788610
476394 was not bl
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-CC: ncur...@packages.debian.org
Control: block 230990 by -1
For quite some time, ncurses had the option to be built with a new ABI
that enables applications to use mouse wheels,
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #796088 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package libvirt/1.2.9-9+deb8u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
796088: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796088
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
Guido Günther wrote (20 Aug 2015 11:57:36 GMT) :
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 04:53:32PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> I have to admit that I'm also confused by the patch for #786650:
[...]
>> That seems to make sense...
>>
>> + # for hostdev
>> + /sys/devices/
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Please consider accepting the following changes for packages GOsa² in
jessie-proposed-updates.
+ * debian/patches:
After deployment of two Debian Edu sites based on Debian jessie,
On 08/24/2015 06:18 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 24.08.2015, 16:54 +0200 schrieb Niels Thykier:
>> Mind you, some of the haskell packages are waiting for "icu", which
>> is waiting for gcc-5. Examples include "haskell
>> -blogliterately/amd64"[1] and "haskell-text-icu/amd
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 11:20 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> > We're somewhat overdue for both 8.2 and 7.9 now (in that order). Some
> > potential September dates:
> >
> > 5/6th - okay for me
>
> Should be okay, provided I get internet on Aug 31st as planned.
That's l
On 08/21/2015 01:12 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 18/08/15 00:37, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 01:46:16PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>>> Having done more rebuilds in Ubuntu, it would be great if you could
>>> publish a complete list of the transitions you believe to be necess
Your message dated Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:56:19 +0200
with message-id <20150824165619.gw3...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#796799: nmu: kdecoration_4:5.3.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #796799,
regarding nmu: kdecoration_4:5.3.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Hi,
Am Montag, den 24.08.2015, 18:26 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
>
> > From the top of my head, there is haskell-src-exts on mips and mipsel,
> > together with reverse dependencies (haskel-hoogle, hlint, hothasktags).
>
> libghc-hlint-dev, libghc-hlint-prof are still in unstable, block
On 24/08/15 13:58, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 24.08.2015, 13:55 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
>> On 24/08/15 13:37, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>>> from my understanding, the current Haskell packages in unstable
>>> should
>>> be able to migrate to testing. At least my bi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu kdecoration_4:5.3.2-2 . ALL . stretch . -m "Rebuild against gcc4, to have a
working breeze/oxygen theme."
Hi, the migration of kdecoration to testing broke kde in stretch a few days
ag
Hi,
Am Montag, den 24.08.2015, 16:54 +0200 schrieb Niels Thykier:
> Mind you, some of the haskell packages are waiting for "icu", which
> is waiting for gcc-5. Examples include "haskell
> -blogliterately/amd64"[1] and "haskell-text-icu/amd64"[2].
>
> I am not sure this is good...
well, at leas
Your message dated Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:57:50 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Closing bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #796083,
regarding nmu: soqt_1.6.0~e8310f-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:57:50 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Closing bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #796084,
regarding nmu: vtk6_6.2.0+dfsg1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Build-depend conflicts are resolved.
Thanks
Anton
On 2015-08-24 13:58, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 24.08.2015, 13:55 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
>> On 24/08/15 13:37, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>>> from my understanding, the current Haskell packages in unstable
>>> should
>>> be able to migrate to testing. At least my
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 790980 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-assimp.html
Bug #790980 [release.debian.org] assimp: library transition to libassimp3v5
Bug #795125 [release.debian.org] transition: libassimp3 -> libassimp3v5
Set Bug forwarded-to-
Hi,
Am Montag, den 24.08.2015, 13:55 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> On 24/08/15 13:37, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > from my understanding, the current Haskell packages in unstable
> > should
> > be able to migrate to testing. At least my binNMU tool¹ does not
> > indicate any errors on rel
On 24/08/15 13:37, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> from my understanding, the current Haskell packages in unstable should
> be able to migrate to testing. At least my binNMU tool¹ does not
> indicate any errors on release architectures, and the release tracker²
> only shows what I
Dear release team,
from my understanding, the current Haskell packages in unstable should
be able to migrate to testing. At least my binNMU tool¹ does not
indicate any errors on release architectures, and the release tracker²
only shows what I believe are false negatives.
Nevertheless, none of th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 796345 with 787450 787453 787493 787499 787500 787912 787446 787468
> 788073
Bug #796345 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.22
796345 was not blocked by any bugs.
796345 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 796345: 78749
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ecasound.html
Bug #791026 [release.debian.org] ecasound: library transition may be needed
when GCC 5 is the default
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ecaso
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ecasound.html
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:25:46am +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 at 10:17:19 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > In the case of ecasound, the C++ dependencies don't seem to have been
> > flagged
libstxxl needed a GCC 5 transition after all due to the recent
acceptance of osrm into the archive.
Thanks to Anton for updating libstxxl for GCC 5 in unstable.
osrm (4.7.1-1) has just been accepted into unstable, after it's built on
all architectures this transition should be done.
Kind Regards
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 at 10:17:19 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> In the case of ecasound, the C++ dependencies don't seem to have been
> flagged for transition, so I think this means you can upload any time
> (but please check).
I have NMU'd this to DELAYED/2, with no changes other than to the chang
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 791173
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libstxxl.html
Bug #791173 [release.debian.org] libstxxl: library transition may be needed
when GCC 5 is the default
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 791173
Bug #791173 {Done: Anton Gladky } [src:libstxxl] libstxxl:
library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and y
34 matches
Mail list logo
