Bug#787391: marked as done (transition: evolution-data-server)

Your message dated Fri, 03 Jul 2015 01:15:45 +0200 with message-id <5595c621.4090...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#787391: transition: evolution-data-server has caused the Debian Bug report #787391, regarding transition: evolution-data-server to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: Re: Bug#789028: transition: gnome-panel

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 789028 + pending Bug #789028 [release.debian.org] transition: gnome-panel Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 789028: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789028

Processed: Re: Bug#790756: transition: libstdc++6 cxx11

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 790756 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libstdc++6.html Bug #790756 [release.debian.org] transition: libstdc++6 cxx11 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libstdc++6.html'. > thanks Sto

Re: preparing for GCC 5, especially libstdc++6

On 01/07/15 14:39, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 06/26/2015 03:01 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 25/06/15 17:44, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> On 06/25/2015 01:20 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: On 06/25/2015 11:23 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > - You suggest that some libraries may need

Processed: glew and avogadro

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 760849 by 790859 Bug #760849 [release.debian.org] transition: glew 760849 was blocked by: 790857 787746 790776 760849 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 760849: 790859 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Processed: glew and warzone2100

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 760849 by 790857 Bug #760849 [release.debian.org] transition: glew 760849 was blocked by: 790776 787746 760849 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 760849: 790857 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Processed: block 760849 with 790776

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 760849 with 790776 Bug #760849 [release.debian.org] transition: glew 760849 was blocked by: 787746 760849 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 760849: 790776 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need as

Processed: block 760849 with 787746

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 760849 with 787746 Bug #760849 [release.debian.org] transition: glew 760849 was not blocked by any bugs. 760849 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 760849: 787746 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you n

Bug#790756: GCC-5 related build failures for the libstdc++6 transition

the list of GCC-5 related build failures for the libstdc++6 transition: stage1: #777855 [S| | ] [src:freefem3d] freefem3d: ftbfs with GCC-5 #777860 [S| | ] [src:gargoyle-free] gargoyle-free: ftbfs with GCC-5 #777887 [S| | ] [src:google-perftools] google-perftools: ftbfs with GCC-5 #777922 [

Bug#760849: transition: glew

On 02/07/15 09:33, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > Hi Emilio! > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> On 01/07/15 17:10, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: >>> Hi Jonathan! >>> >>> On Thu, 21 May 2015 11:59:44 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire >>> wrote: Could you summarise which p

Bug#760849: transition: glew

Hi Emilio! On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 01/07/15 17:10, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: >> Hi Jonathan! >> >> On Thu, 21 May 2015 11:59:44 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire >> wrote: >>> Could you summarise which packages now ftbfs, and the ones you think may >>> be GLEW-r