Processed: Re: Bug#788876: transition: libgtop2

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 788876 + pending Bug #788876 [release.debian.org] transition: libgtop2 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 788876: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788876 Deb

Processed: Re: Bug#786713: transition: libwps

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 786713 pending Bug #786713 [release.debian.org] transition: libwps Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 786713: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786713 Debian

Processed: Re: Bug#787391: transition: evolution-data-server

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 787391 + pending Bug #787391 [release.debian.org] transition: evolution-data-server Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 787391: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b

Bug#790064: testing watch script: One mail per maintainer

Package: release.debian.org Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I just got 763 mails, one per Haskell package that migrated to testing. This is of course very nice and makes me happy, but still quite a lot. Would it make sense to group these mails per maintainer?

Processed: block 789133 with 790062

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 789133 with 790062 Bug #789133 [release.debian.org] transition: ocaml 4.02.2 789133 was blocked by: 789403 789614 789354 789619 789402 789133 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 789133: 790062 > thanks Stopping processing her

Bug#790060: jessie-pu: nbd update?

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, #785727 describes a regression in the version of nbd-server in jessie wrt the one in wheezy, related to the "allow" configuration file. It's not a security-related bug (as it di

Bug#790020: marked as done (nmu: slurm-drmaa_1.0.7-1)

Your message dated Fri, 26 Jun 2015 12:46:10 +0200 with message-id <558d2d72.4050...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#790020: nmu: slurm-drmaa_1.0.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #790020, regarding nmu: slurm-drmaa_1.0.7-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#790020: nmu: slurm-drmaa_1.0.7-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu slurm-drmaa_1.0.7-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against slurm-llnl 14.11.6" Looks like a mini-transition started by slurm-llnl, only affecting slurm-drmaa. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Bug#789365: transition: ghc-7.8

Hi, Am Freitag, den 26.06.2015, 02:56 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: > On 25/06/15 12:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 24/06/15 16:12, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2015, 15:05 +0200 schrieb Joachim > > > Breitner: > > > > * leksah ought to b