Processing changes file: libraw_0.14.6-2+deb7u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1z56fe-0001by...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: libraw_0.14.6-2+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libraw_0.14.6-2+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libraw_0.14.6-2+deb7u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libraw_0.14.6-2+deb7u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing chang
On 06/16/2015 01:21 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 14/06/15 13:28, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 06/14/2015 04:29 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 17:39:14 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
>>> wrote:
>>>
This hasn't been an issue before, so I'm tempted to ignore i
Processing changes file: libraw_0.14.6-2+deb7u1_sourceupload.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: p7zip_9.20.1~dfsg.1-4+deb7u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: p7zip_9.20.1~dfsg.1-4+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: p7zip_9.20.1~dfsg.1-4+deb7u1_armel.change
Processing changes file: tzdata_2015e-0+deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1z4ywv-0002na...@franck.debian.org
Hi,
it's time to prepare for GCC 5 as the default compiler in unstable. Compared to
earlier version bumps, the switch to GCC 5 is a bit more complicated because
libstdc++6 sees a few ABI incompatibilities, partially depending on the C++
standard version used for the builds. libstdc++6 will suppo
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #787403 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package libraw/0.14.6-2+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
787403: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787403
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSU
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 16:35 +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> On 2015-06-14 at 16:03 (CEST), Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Please go ahead; sorry for the delay.
>
> Uploaded. Thanks.
Flagged for acceptance.
Regards,
A
Processing changes file: libdatetime-timezone-perl_1.58-1+2015e_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1z4wuv-0001qs...@franck.debi
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 20:31 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 15:05:56 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 01:59 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > > libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.58-1+2015e is the update of the
> > > libdatetime-t
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #788664 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package
libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.58-1+2015e
Added tag(s) pending.
--
788664: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788664
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 786713 with 788969
Bug #786713 [release.debian.org] transition: libwps
786713 was not blocked by any bugs.
786713 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 786713: 788969
> block 786713 with 788970
Bug #786713 [release.debian.org]
block -1 by 788969
block -1 by 788970
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 07:49:53PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > So we don't need to wait for 5.0.0. But for 5.0.0 we need it :)
>
> Let's do this after libreoffice migrates (which should happen soon,
OK.
> when evolution-data-server
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libwps.html
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 16/06/15 18:20, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:07:29PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> That I meant. Just a minimal patch to build against the new libwps
>> - witho
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libwps.html
Bug #786713 [release.debian.org] transition: libwps
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libwps.html'.
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #786713 [release.deb
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:07:29PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> That I meant. Just a minimal patch to build against the new libwps
> - without using the new features - in the style of the calligra/abiword
> patches.
>
> Didn't verify this yet, though. Should do soonish, though, already added
> t
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jun 2015 16:09:53 +0200
with message-id <55802e31.5020...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#787737: transition: (actually µtransition) qt4-x11
has caused the Debian Bug report #787737,
regarding transition: (actually µtransition) qt4-x11
to be marked as done.
This mea
qt4 migrated so I think this can be closed now :)
Thanks *a lot* you all :)
--
The POP3 server service depends on the SMTP server service, which
failed to start because of the following error:
The operation completed successfully.
-- Windows NT Server v3.51
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi there,
please allow lame/3.99.5+repack1-7+deb8u1 into jessie. It fixes an
obscure crash when lame is called from the OCaml bindings. The fix has
been in unstable for five days an
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
the APT team (python division) would like to update
python-apt to fix some issues.
A diff against 0.9.3.11 is attached (sans
noise created by the build system - aka updated
mi
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:08:48AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > The LO patch isn't backportable without much effort (keeping the new
> > features) but we can (probably, to be verified) do it the same style as
> > abiword/calligra.
>
> Sorry, but can you rephrase that? Do you mean
21 matches
Mail list logo
