Hints for d-i jessie RC3, part 2

2015-04-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi people, here's a second round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy. Feel free to age packages if you wish. Also, I've seen the linux upload but I won't have time to play with until after the mini DebConf in Lyon.

Bug#781726: how to solve the live-tools upgrade issue? (#781725)

2015-04-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2015-04-02 11:27, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 10:17:52AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> live-tools/wheezy is buggy, causing install/upgrade failures in other >> packages (wheezy: #779888, upgrade: #781725). >> The underlying dependency issue has been fixed in jessie lo

Bug#782165: wheezy-pu: package debootstrap/1.0.48+deb7u3

2015-04-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 00:37 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Adam D. Barratt (2015-04-08): > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 21:51 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > finally time to get some stable updates… Here's the bug report I'd like >

Processed: Re: Bug#782165: wheezy-pu: package debootstrap/1.0.48+deb7u3

2015-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #782165 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package debootstrap/1.0.48+deb7u3 Added tag(s) pending. -- 782165: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782165 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To U

Bug#782267: marked as done (unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150324)

2015-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Apr 2015 19:26:45 +0100 with message-id <1428604005.7798.39.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#782267: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150324 has caused the Debian Bug report #782267, regarding unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150324

Bug#782002: marked as done (unblock: (pre-approval) opensc)

2015-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Apr 2015 19:25:00 +0100 with message-id <1428603900.7798.38.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#782002: unblock: (pre-approval) opensc has caused the Debian Bug report #782002, regarding unblock: (pre-approval) opensc to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#782268: marked as done (RM: get-iplayer/2.87-2)

2015-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 09 Apr 2015 19:22:08 +0100 with message-id <1428603728.7798.37.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#782268: RM: get-iplayer/2.87-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #782268, regarding RM: get-iplayer/2.87-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#782268: RM: get-iplayer/2.87-2

2015-04-09 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm The moving target that is iPlayer has moved again, and get-iplayer in Jessie can no longer retrieve programmes with a high enough success rate to be useful. Please remove it from Jessie and I wil

Bug#782267: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150324

2015-04-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: tag -1 d-i confirmed Holger Levsen (2015-04-09): > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > x-debbugs-cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org, o...@debian.org, > debian-...@lists.debian.org > > Hi, > > please unblock

Processed: Re: Bug#782267: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150324

2015-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 d-i confirmed Bug #782267 [release.debian.org] unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150324 Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed. -- 782267: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782267 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#782267: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150324

2015-04-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock x-debbugs-cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org, o...@debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org Hi, please unblock debian-installer-netboot-images/20150324 so we get the latest d-i images from te

Re: Proposal to do regular jenkins updates via jessie-updates (Was: Re: Removing Jenkins from Jessie)

2015-04-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mittwoch, 8. April 2015, Niels Thykier wrote: > * There are several jenkins-* packages that will (presumably) need to >be updated as often as Jenkins itself. I wondered which packages were "jenkins*" and figured it out with the help from Adam: holger@coccia:~$ dak rm -Rn jenkins Wil

Re: Proposal to do regular jenkins updates via jessie-updates

2015-04-09 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 09/04/2015 10:10, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit : > Of course this only works as long as no new dependencies are pulled in, > or at least stay at something managable. Jenkins upgrades have been accompanied by new dependencies in the past, the upstream developers often refactor the code and split so

Bug#782190: pre-approve: nginx/1.6.3-1

2015-04-09 Thread Christos Trochalakis
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Hello, I have prepared an upload for nginx (1.6.3-1) and I'd like to request a pre-approval for jessie. 1.6.3 is the latest upstream stable bugfix release including 6 bug fixes[0]. One of them fixes a tcp nodelay issue with spdy that effectively mak

Re: Proposal to do regular jenkins updates via jessie-updates

2015-04-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2015-04-09 9:10, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: [...] So it looks to me like we currently miss a place to offer a package like Jenkins to stable users, but it would be nice to have one as I believe there will be more packages in this situation in the future (even though we might not like this). I

Bug#782180: unblock pre-approval: apt-zip/0.18+nmu1

2015-04-09 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Niels, hi Cate, Niels Thykier wrote: > Thanks for spending time on it and trying to solve it. > > Sadly, I am not convinced that apt-zip is actively maintained, regularly > used/tested nor that it is ready for Jessie. Indeed, I noticed that, too: Last upload 2008. I was actually surprised abo

Re: Proposal to do regular jenkins updates via jessie-updates

2015-04-09 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, "Adam D. Barratt" writes: > On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 23:33 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: >> On 2015-04-08 22:45, Miguel Landaeta wrote: >> > Do you think is feasible or acceptable to maintain Jenkins in >> > jessie-updates suite instead? >> >> I am not entirely convinced that Jenkins applies to s