Re: Hints for d-i jessie RC2, part 2

2015-03-09 Thread Christian PERRIER
> ### l10n + one compiler pacification: wrt l10n, I'm left with two packages now: - choose-mirror, which I have trouble compiling, no idea why. Notice that I tried to update its embarked Mirrors.masterlist, which is something we probably want for Jessie - console-setup that had some more transl

Bug#780169: jessie-pu: package youtube-dl/2014.08.05-1jessie0.1

2015-03-09 Thread Stefano Rivera
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu youtube-dl 2014.08.05-1 requires SSLv3 in https requests, and doesn't use protocol negotiation. See #780059. This, besides being bad, and not very future-proof has caused complete in

Re: Hints for d-i jessie RC2, part 2

2015-03-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 00:13 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 09:22:13PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > here's another list of unblock and/or unblock-udeb for d-i. Please note > > that I'm only not-objecting to lvm2, I didn't extensively review it. > > I unblocked i

Re: Hints for d-i jessie RC2, part 2

2015-03-09 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi, On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 09:22:13PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > here's another list of unblock and/or unblock-udeb for d-i. Please note > that I'm only not-objecting to lvm2, I didn't extensively review it. I unblocked it. Ben, is there a specific reason you didn't include the fix for #778

Bug#780154: unblock: oss4/4.2-build2010-2

2015-03-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Ivo De Decker, le Mon 09 Mar 2015 23:53:11 +0100, a écrit : > Once kfreebsd is removed from jessie, I'll reinstate the removal hint. Why so? The oss4 package maintainers had added the Linux drivers part of it for some reason I guess (and it's not kfreebsd). Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Processed: Re: Bug#780154: unblock: oss4/4.2-build2010-2

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #780154 {Done: Ivo De Decker } [release.debian.org] unblock: oss4/4.2-build2010-2 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 780154: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780154 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#780154: unblock: oss4/4.2-build2010-2

2015-03-09 Thread Julien Cristau
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 22:22:21 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package oss4 > > A security issue was filed against the usb drivers cont

Bug#780154: marked as done (unblock: oss4/4.2-build2010-2)

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 9 Mar 2015 23:53:11 +0100 with message-id <20150309225310.gb23...@ugent.be> and subject line Re: Bug#780154: unblock: oss4/4.2-build2010-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #780154, regarding unblock: oss4/4.2-build2010-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#780150: marked as done (RM: python-cream/0.5.3-1)

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 9 Mar 2015 23:54:06 +0100 with message-id <20150309225406.gc23...@ugent.be> and subject line Re: Bug#780150: RM: python-cream/0.5.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #780150, regarding RM: python-cream/0.5.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#780148: marked as done (RM: cream-melange/0.5.2-2)

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 9 Mar 2015 23:51:13 +0100 with message-id <20150309225113.ga23...@ugent.be> and subject line Re: Bug#780148: RM: cream-melange/0.5.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #780148, regarding RM: cream-melange/0.5.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#780154: unblock: oss4/4.2-build2010-2

2015-03-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package oss4 A security issue was filed against the usb drivers contained in the oss4 package, and was pung again late January as #775662, but maintainers of that part of the

Bug#780150: RM: python-cream/0.5.3-1

2015-03-09 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Please remove python-cream from Debian jessie, it is weakly maintained upstream and not appropriate for jessie. light+love, Mike -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers stable

Bug#778332: RM: oss4/4.2-build2010-1.1

2015-03-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 20:29:43 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 09:46:20AM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 05:52:36PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > please remove oss4 from jessie. There's been no maintainer > > > followup sin

Hints for d-i jessie RC2, part 2

2015-03-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, here's another list of unblock and/or unblock-udeb for d-i. Please note that I'm only not-objecting to lvm2, I didn't extensively review it. Ben also mentioned initramfs-tools past week, which you might want to consider. I've added Ben to Cc so that he can comment on both as appropriate. The r

Bug#780148: RM: cream-melange/0.5.2-2

2015-03-09 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Please remove cream-melange from Debian jessie, it is weakly maintained upstream and the cream-melange-widgets package has not yet been package for Debian, thus Cream Melange is still incomplete.

Re: [Pkg-puppet-devel] [Jessie/puppet] Status on #775795 and #778891

2015-03-09 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2015-03-09 18:55, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote: > Niels Thykier writes: > >> Hi Puppet maintainers, >> >> There are currently two remaining RC bugs against puppet, which affects >> the version in Jessie. >> >> * #775795 - puppet: Service's debian provider assumes SysV init >> * #778891 - pup

Processed: Re: Bug#780091: unblock (pre-approval): atril/1.8.1+dfsg1-4

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #780091 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): atril/1.8.1+dfsg1-4 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 780091: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780091 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- T

Bug#780091: unblock (pre-approval): atril/1.8.1+dfsg1-4

2015-03-09 Thread Mike Gabriel
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Mo 09 Mär 2015 18:41:45 CET, Niels Thykier wrote: Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo On 2015-03-09 09:41, Mike Gabriel wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please consider unblockin

Bug#780091: marked as done (unblock (pre-approval): atril/1.8.1+dfsg1-4)

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Mar 2015 20:28:17 +0100 with message-id <54fdf451.9070...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#780091: unblock (pre-approval): atril/1.8.1+dfsg1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #780091, regarding unblock (pre-approval): atril/1.8.1+dfsg1-4 to be marked as done. This

Bug#778332: RM: oss4/4.2-build2010-1.1

2015-03-09 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 09:46:20AM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 05:52:36PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > please remove oss4 from jessie. There's been no maintainer > > followup since a month (plus no action back then we Ben > > initially reported it to the m

Bug#780130: marked as done (unblock (pre-approval): python-x2go/0.5.0.1-3)

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Mar 2015 20:23:41 +0100 with message-id <54fdf33d.3010...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#780130: unblock (pre-approval): python-x2go/0.5.0.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #780130, regarding unblock (pre-approval): python-x2go/0.5.0.1-3 to be marked as done. T

Bug#780092: marked as done (unblock (pre-approval): mate-utils/1.8.1+dfsg1-2)

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Mar 2015 20:22:40 +0100 with message-id <54fdf300.2080...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#780092: unblock (pre-approval): mate-utils/1.8.1+dfsg1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #780092, regarding unblock (pre-approval): mate-utils/1.8.1+dfsg1-2 to be marked as d

Processed: Re: Bug#780130: unblock (pre-approval): python-x2go/0.5.0.1-3

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #780130 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): python-x2go/0.5.0.1-3 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 780130: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780130 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --

Bug#780130: unblock (pre-approval): python-x2go/0.5.0.1-3

2015-03-09 Thread Mike Gabriel
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Mo 09 Mär 2015 18:45:24 CET, Niels Thykier wrote: Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo On 2015-03-09 16:11, Mike Gabriel wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please consider unblockin

Bug#780092: unblock (pre-approval): mate-utils/1.8.1+dfsg1-2

2015-03-09 Thread Mike Gabriel
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Mo 09 Mär 2015 18:40:38 CET, Niels Thykier wrote: Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo On 2015-03-09 09:32, Mike Gabriel wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please consider unblockin

Processed: Re: Bug#780092: unblock (pre-approval): mate-utils/1.8.1+dfsg1-2

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #780092 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): mate-utils/1.8.1+dfsg1-2 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 780092: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780092 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#780130: unblock (pre-approval): python-x2go/0.5.0.1-3

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Bug #780130 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): python-x2go/0.5.0.1-3 Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo. -- 780130: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780130 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or

Bug#780130: unblock (pre-approval): python-x2go/0.5.0.1-3

2015-03-09 Thread Niels Thykier
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo On 2015-03-09 16:11, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please consider unblocking planned upload of package python-x2go. > > I skimmed through python-x2go

Processed: Re: Bug#780091: unblock (pre-approval): atril/1.8.1+dfsg1-4

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Bug #780091 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): atril/1.8.1+dfsg1-4 Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo. -- 780091: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780091 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#780092: unblock (pre-approval): mate-utils/1.8.1+dfsg1-2

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Bug #780092 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): mate-utils/1.8.1+dfsg1-2 Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo. -- 780092: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780092 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debia

Bug#780092: unblock (pre-approval): mate-utils/1.8.1+dfsg1-2

2015-03-09 Thread Niels Thykier
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo On 2015-03-09 09:32, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please consider unblocking planned upload of package mate-utils > > + * debian/patches: > ++ A

Bug#780091: unblock (pre-approval): atril/1.8.1+dfsg1-4

2015-03-09 Thread Niels Thykier
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo On 2015-03-09 09:41, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please consider unblocking planned upload of package atril. > > + * debian/patches: > ++ Add 0

Bug#780090: marked as done (unblock: mate-session-manager/1.8.1-8)

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Mar 2015 18:38:36 +0100 with message-id <54fdda9c.2020...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#780090: unblock: mate-session-manager/1.8.1-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #780090, regarding unblock: mate-session-manager/1.8.1-8 to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#780072: marked as done (unblock: gdm3/3.14.1-5)

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Mar 2015 18:37:01 +0100 with message-id <54fdda3d.3000...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#780072: unblock: gdm3/3.14.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #780072, regarding unblock: gdm3/3.14.1-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#780085: marked as done (unblock: marco/1.8.2+dfsg1-6)

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Mar 2015 17:47:23 +0100 with message-id <54fdce9b.7030...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#780085: unblock: marco/1.8.2+dfsg1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #780085, regarding unblock: marco/1.8.2+dfsg1-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#780120: marked as done (unblock: cyrus-sasl2/2.1.26.dfsg1-13)

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Mar 2015 17:46:04 +0100 with message-id <54fdce4c.5030...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#780120: unblock: cyrus-sasl2/2.1.26.dfsg1-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #780120, regarding unblock: cyrus-sasl2/2.1.26.dfsg1-13 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#780119: marked as done (unblock: librest/0.7.92-3)

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Mar 2015 17:43:51 +0100 with message-id <54fdcdc7.1070...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#780119: unblock: librest/0.7.92-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #780119, regarding unblock: librest/0.7.92-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#780130: unblock (pre-approval): python-x2go/0.5.0.1-3

2015-03-09 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please consider unblocking planned upload of package python-x2go. I skimmed through python-x2go upstream Git and considered the below patches important enough to attempt for an unblock requ

Bug#780121: unblock: libgcrypt20/1.6.3-2

2015-03-09 Thread Andreas Metzler
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hello, Please unblock package libgcrypt20. This is bugfix only stable release, taking care of two side-channel vulnerabilities (CVE-2015-0837 and CVE-2014-3591): Noteworthy changes in versi

Bug#780120: unblock: cyrus-sasl2/2.1.26.dfsg1-13

2015-03-09 Thread Ondřej Surý
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Please unblock package cyrus-sasl2 Kees Cook has brought to my attention that cyrus-sasl2 could close tcp connection prematurely and provide

Bug#780119: unblock: librest/0.7.92-3

2015-03-09 Thread Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package librest (explain the reason for the unblock here) # explain why you want this change included. Bug numbers are a must. I fix RC bug #780101 (grave) # include th

Bug#778338: marked as done (unblock: file/1:5.22+15-1)

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:13:00 +0100 with message-id <20150309131259.gb7...@ugent.be> and subject line Re: Bug#778338: unblock: file/1:5.22+15-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #778338, regarding unblock: file/1:5.22+15-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#780070: marked as done (unblock: u-boot/2014.10+dfsg1-4)

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:10:18 +0100 with message-id <20150309131018.ga7...@ugent.be> and subject line Re: Bug#780070: unblock: u-boot/2014.10+dfsg1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #780070, regarding unblock: u-boot/2014.10+dfsg1-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Processed: Re: Bug#780085: unblock: marco/1.8.2+dfsg1-5

2015-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 unblock: marco/1.8.2+dfsg1-6 Bug #780085 [release.debian.org] unblock: marco/1.8.2+dfsg1-5 Changed Bug title to 'unblock: marco/1.8.2+dfsg1-6' from 'unblock: marco/1.8.2+dfsg1-5' -- 780085: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780085 Debian

Bug#780085: unblock: marco/1.8.2+dfsg1-5

2015-03-09 Thread Mike Gabriel
Control: retitle -1 unblock: marco/1.8.2+dfsg1-6 On Mo 09 Mär 2015 06:32:39 CET, Mike Gabriel wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package marco + * debian/patches: ++ Add 0006_correct-name-for-

Bug#780094: pre-unblock: virtualbox/4.3.18-dfsg-3, virtualbox-guest-additions-iso 4.3.18-2

2015-03-09 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi release team members, can you please ack/nack unblock of package virtualbox and the guest-additions-iso? Many users installs the official virtualbox deb package, rather than the debian

Bug#780092: unblock (pre-approval): mate-utils/1.8.1+dfsg1-2

2015-03-09 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please consider unblocking planned upload of package mate-utils + * debian/patches: ++ Add 0001_mate-dictionary-fix-double-free-error.patch. Avoid crashes of + mate-dictionary due

Bug#780091: unblock (pre-approval): atril/1.8.1+dfsg1-4

2015-03-09 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please consider unblocking planned upload of package atril. + * debian/patches: ++ Add 0002_forgotten-mutex-unlock.patch. Don't forget to unlock the + trylock'ed mutex. Prevents f

Bug#780090: unblock: mate-session-manager/1.8.1-8

2015-03-09 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package mate-session-manager + * debian/patches: ++ Add 0004_no-crash-if-no-req-apps-found.patch. Avoid dereferencing NULL + pointer, avoid m-s-m crashing if no req

Re: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#779612: systemd-sysv,cryptsetup: systemd-sysv, cryptsetup should recommend plymouth; without plymouth cryptsetup prompts are unusable

2015-03-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:45:28 +0100, Jonas Meurer wrote: > Hi Gordon, > > thanks for the bugreport. I escalate this bugreport to the > debian-release team, asking for advice: would you accept another > cryptsetup upload targeted to jessie in order to add 'plymouth' to the > list of recommended

Bug#778338: unblock: file/1:5.22+15-1

2015-03-09 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2015-03-09 08:30, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Hi there, > > [...] > Just one more thing: > >> Not to mention, in the previous release, an upload of file (for >> unstable) broke dpkg's dpkg-shlibs. I know it was not you, who uploaded >> that and I suspect this version of file is unlikely to be

Re: Hints for d-i jessie RC2, part 1

2015-03-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Michael Gilbert (2015-03-08): > On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Hi people, > > > > here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i > > jessie RC2. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy. > > Cyril, > > Would it be possible also

Bug#778338: unblock: file/1:5.22+15-1

2015-03-09 Thread Christoph Biedl
Hi there, while finally preparing an answer I noticed somebody unblocked the file package for jessie without further discussion. Whoever pulled the strings, thanks a lot. And I hope this will not end in regressions or other annoyances. Just one more thing: > Not to mention, in the previous rel