Bug#773163: unblock: systemd/215-8

2014-12-18 Thread Martin Pitt
Adam D. Barratt [2014-12-15 19:16 +]: > Unblocked, but will as ever need a d-i ack. It still didn't propagate, I guess the d-i ack didn't happen yet? -8 does not change any udev code or the udebs, so d-i should be rather unaffected? Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt| htt

Bug#772468: unblock: (pre-approval) libspring-java/3.2.12-1

2014-12-18 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 19/12/2014 01:00, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit : > Ok, I did some digging. CVE-2014-3578 seems to be unknown to some sources > including NVD. Considering they are both meant to be directory traversal, > I would guess it was a duplicate assignment; let's ignore it for now. > > That leaves CVE-201

Bug#773493: unblock: pyspf/2.0.11-1

2014-12-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package pyspf RC bug fix. Note: The diff is somewhat cluttered since I chose to upload the fix in the form of the new upstream release as the RC fix is the only change from

Bug#772468: unblock: (pre-approval) libspring-java/3.2.12-1

2014-12-18 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 03:56:33PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Please unblock package libspring-java. This package is affected by two > security issues: CVE-2014-3578 (#760733) and CVE-2014-3625 (#769698). > The fix for CVE-2014-3578 is unknown and can't be backported, the only > solution left t

Bug#773490: (pre-upload) unblock: gcc-mingw-w64/14.3

2014-12-18 Thread Stephen Kitt
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, I would like to know if the following changes to gcc-mingw-w64 would be acceptable for Jessie, before uploading the package to unstable; they fix #773342, a serious bug filed against mi

Bug#773465: unblock: exim4/4.84-5

2014-12-18 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 18:59:35 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > + * Change the init script's restart order from { regenerate_config; stop; > +start ; } to { stop; regenerate_config; start ; }. (Thanks, Jakub Warmuz) > +Closes: #768874 Does this mean that, if there's an error in the conf

Bug#773478: marked as done (unblock: bsd-mailx/8.1.2-0.20141216cvs-1)

2014-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Dec 2014 00:14:26 +0100 with message-id <20141218231426.go1...@betterave.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#773478: unblock: bsd-mailx/8.1.2-0.20141216cvs-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #773478, regarding unblock: bsd-mailx/8.1.2-0.20141216cvs-1 to be marked as don

Bug#773479: pu: package intel-microcode/1.20140913.1

2014-12-18 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed wheezy > > > > On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 17:59 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > Please approve an update of intel-microcode in non-free stable (wheezy),

Processed: Re: Bug#773458: unblock: amd64-microcode/2.20141028.1

2014-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 773458 - moreinfo Bug #773458 [release.debian.org] unblock: amd64-microcode/2.20141028.1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 773458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor

Bug#773458: unblock: amd64-microcode/2.20141028.1

2014-12-18 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
tag 773458 - moreinfo thanks On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo > > > > On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 14:44 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > Please unblock package amd64-microcode >

Bug#773479: pu: package intel-microcode/1.20140913.1

2014-12-18 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed wheezy > > On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 17:59 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > Please approve an update of intel-microcode in non-free stable (wheezy), > > to version 1.20140913.1. > > > > Intel released in 2014-09-1

Bug#773458: unblock: amd64-microcode/2.20141028.1

2014-12-18 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo > > On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 14:44 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > Please unblock package amd64-microcode > > > > > > This is a freeze policy exception request, for which I apologise. > > The package i

Bug#730251: pu: package shutdown-at-night/0.10+deb7u1

2014-12-18 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 pending On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 07:01:29AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Jonathan Wiltshire 2014-11-07] > > Yes, looks ok. > > Thanks. The new package is uploaded now. Flagged for acceptance. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Deb

Processed: Re: Bug#730251: pu: package shutdown-at-night/0.10+deb7u1

2014-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #730251 [release.debian.org] pu: package shutdown-at-night/0.10+deb7u1 Bug #742481 [release.debian.org] pu: package shutdown-at-night/0.10+deb7u2 Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s) pending. -- 730251: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?

Bug#773299: marked as done (unblock: python-lightblue/0.3.2-2)

2014-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:43:17 + with message-id <20141218224317.gq11...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#773299: unblock: python-lightblue/0.3.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #773299, regarding unblock: python-lightblue/0.3.2-2 to be marked as done. Th

Processed: Re: Bug#773479: pu: package intel-microcode/1.20140913.1

2014-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed wheezy Bug #773479 [release.debian.org] pu: package intel-microcode/1.20140913.1 Added tag(s) wheezy and confirmed. -- 773479: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773479 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#773479: pu: package intel-microcode/1.20140913.1

2014-12-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed wheezy On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 17:59 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Please approve an update of intel-microcode in non-free stable (wheezy), > to version 1.20140913.1. > > Intel released in 2014-09-13 a new microcode update package, which targets > their Ha

Bug#773458: unblock: amd64-microcode/2.20141028.1

2014-12-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 14:44 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Please unblock package amd64-microcode > > > This is a freeze policy exception request, for which I apologise. > The package is in non-free, it is a leaf package, and it is system firmwa

Processed: Re: Bug#773458: unblock: amd64-microcode/2.20141028.1

2014-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo Bug #773458 [release.debian.org] unblock: amd64-microcode/2.20141028.1 Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo. -- 773458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773458 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#773479: pu: package intel-microcode/1.20140913.1

2014-12-18 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Please approve an update of intel-microcode in non-free stable (wheezy), to version 1.20140913.1. Intel released in 2014-09-13 a new microcode update package, which targets their Haswell process

Bug#773478: unblock: bsd-mailx/8.1.2-0.20141216cvs-1

2014-12-18 Thread Robert Luberda
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock the following version of bsd-mailx: bsd-mailx (8.1.2-0.20141216cvs-1) unstable; urgency=high * New upstream version from OpenBSD cvs repository. The version consists of:

Bug#773447: marked as done (unblock: keystone/2014.1.3-4)

2014-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:19:31 + with message-id <1418926771.23220.7.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#773447: unblock: keystone/2014.1.3-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #773447, regarding unblock: keystone/2014.1.3-4 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#773465: unblock: exim4/4.84-5

2014-12-18 Thread Andreas Metzler
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package exim4. unblock exim4/4.84-5 This is a bugfix only upload, featuring two fixes of important priority: * 82_quoted-or-r-2047-encoded.diff pulled from upstream git (san

Bug#772151: marked as done (unblock: db5.3/5.3.28-7)

2014-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:57:27 + with message-id <1418925447.23220.5.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#772151: unblock: db5.3/5.3.28-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #772151, regarding unblock: db5.3/5.3.28-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#773448: marked as done (unblock: libgd2/2.1.0-5)

2014-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:59:45 + with message-id <1418925585.23220.6.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#773448: unblock: libgd2/2.1.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #773448, regarding unblock: libgd2/2.1.0-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#773458: unblock: amd64-microcode/2.20141028.1

2014-12-18 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package amd64-microcode This is a freeze policy exception request, for which I apologise. The package is in non-free, it is a leaf package, and it is system firmware. This

Bug#772791: release.debian.org: unblock: cmigemo 1:1.2+gh0.20140306-5

2014-12-18 Thread Youhei SASAKI
Hi, At Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:40:34 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > (cc-ing a -done address means we never see it, good job you also mailed me) Oh, your right. thanks. > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 05:11:52PM +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote: > > Hi, > > > > At Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:23:14 +, > > Jona

Bug#773299: unblock: python-lightblue/0.3.2-2

2014-12-18 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > >In fact, this package should probably be adopted by the python-modules > >team. I can make sure that this happens since I'm part of the team. Would > >that reassure you? > > Ok, it's a deal. > > Let me know when it's ad

Processed: Re: Bug#773299: unblock: python-lightblue/0.3.2-2

2014-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 - moreinfo Bug #773299 [release.debian.org] unblock: python-lightblue/0.3.2-2 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 773299: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773299 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRI

Bug#772151: unblock: db5.3/5.3.28-7

2014-12-18 Thread Ondřej Surý
Uploaded to ftp-master with Distribution: jessie, attaching debdiff for records: $ git diff debian/5.3.28-7..debian/5.3.28-7_deb8u1 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index ff3fa07..402263a 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,8 +1,14 @@ +db5.3 (5.3.28-7~deb8u1

De winter komt eraan, we geven u een espresso apparaat cadeau

2014-12-18 Thread Sip-Well
Zin in een hartverwarmende pauze? Geniet van heerlijke koffie en water dankzij Sip-Well! - Op kantoor of thuis - Heerlijk water van bronwaterkwaliteit - Bruisend, gekoeld en warm water - Met handige 10L flessen - 14 dagen gratis proefplaatsing Ontvang gratis een luxe espresso apparaat bij bestell

Bug#773114: marked as done (pre-approve unblock: tryton-server/3.4.0-3)

2014-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:57:24 + with message-id <20141218125724.gp11...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#773114: pre-approve unblock: tryton-server/3.4.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #773114, regarding pre-approve unblock: tryton-server/3.4.0-3 to be m

Bug#773448: unblock: libgd2/2.1.0-5

2014-12-18 Thread Ondřej Surý
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Please unblock package libgd2 Hi, new release with a upstream fix for buffer overflow found by ASAN by Jan Bee. Also removing seanius from

Bug#772791: release.debian.org: unblock: cmigemo 1:1.2+gh0.20140306-5

2014-12-18 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
(cc-ing a -done address means we never see it, good job you also mailed me) On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 05:11:52PM +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote: > Hi, > > At Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:23:14 +, > Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 02:40:47PM +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote: > > > These

Bug#773447: unblock: keystone/2014.1.3-4

2014-12-18 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, My last upload of Keystone fixes a few bugs which I would like to get rid of for Jessie, including: - Fix for Systemd startup - Inclusion of keystone.cron.hourly (very important in prod

Bug#773203: unblock: php5/5.6.4+dfsg-0+deb8u1

2014-12-18 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi Adam, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014, at 21:56, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 16:01 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > this is a preliminary request to unblock php5/5.6.4+dfsg-1 that hasn't > > been release yet. > [...] > > The option I would like to avoid is

Processed: Re: Bug#773149: what to do with x52pro???

2014-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 - moreinfo Bug #773149 [release.debian.org] what to do with x52pro??? Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 773149: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773149 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Bug#773149: what to do with x52pro???

2014-12-18 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo On 2014-12-17 22:16, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > So I don't think there's much choice, even if it is really nasty... > If you're happy to prepare the dummy packages, please go ahead and let's > see how they turn out. Upgrade path seems fine now. The updated udev rules