Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
systemd 215-8 has now been in unstable for 9 days without any
regression reports. It fixes the three current RC bugs in testing, so
I think it's time to let this in.
I attach the full debdi
Your message dated Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:28:11 +0100
with message-id <548e7f7b.9030...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#773162: unblock: debconf/1.5.55
has caused the Debian Bug report #773162,
regarding unblock: debconf/1.5.55
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debconf
The 1.5.55 release consists only of translation updates. See the
attached debdiff file.
unblock debconf/1.5.55
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
Ar
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 771929 unblock: openstack-pkg-tools/20
Bug #771929 [release.debian.org] (pre-approved) unblock: openstack-pkg-tools/20
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: openstack-pkg-tools/20' from '(pre-approved)
unblock: openstack-pkg-tools/20'
>
End of m
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sun, 2014-12-14 at 18:36 -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Please unblock package rpm.
>
> 773101 reports two security issues in rpm, which 4.11.3-1.1 fixes using
> patches
> extracted from upstream.
For the record, this is in DELAYED/5. Please remove the "moreinfo" tag
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #773152 [release.debian.org] unblock: rpm/4.11.3-1.1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
773152: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773152
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package rpm.
773101 reports two security issues in rpm, which 4.11.3-1.1 fixes using patches
extracted from upstream.
The differences between 4.11.3-1 and 4.11.3-1.1 are att
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
x52pro has been neglected after its initial maintainer upload and a
single NMU in 2011.
x52pro | 0.1.1-2.1 | wheezy | source
x52pro | 0.1.1-2.1 | sid| source
It has no rdepends in ei
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 04:08:38PM +, Adam Barratt wrote:
>On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 20:33 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> 31st / 1st - Fine for me
>
>I spotted earlier that that weekend is FOSDEM, which presumably changes
>the answer for at least some people.
Yes, good point...
--
Steve McInty
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Is it OK to uploade rabbitmq-server/3.3.5-1.1 to testing-proposed-updates?
773134 reports that it is insecure because it trusts the X-Forwarded-For HTTP
header. The following patches were
Your message dated Sun, 14 Dec 2014 23:12:54 +0100
with message-id <20141214221254.ga20...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#773073: unblock: mdadm/3.3.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #773073,
regarding unblock: mdadm/3.3.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Hi Adam,
Le 14/12/2014 17:44, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 17:56 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
>> With the latest DSA 3061-1, icedove is updated to 31 via security, and some
>> extensions may again need some update.
> I dream of the day when we don't have to worry about this stu
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 17:56 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> With the latest DSA 3061-1, icedove is updated to 31 via security, and some
> extensions may again need some update.
>
> The incompatibility of nostalgy with icedove 31 is known for a while, so
> the fix for #75
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #767538 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package
nostalgy/0.2.32+4real-1~deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
767538: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767538
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #773053 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package
nvidia-graphics-drivers/304.125-1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
773053: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773053
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sat, 2014-12-13 at 19:02 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Security update for CVE-2014-8298 (the NVIDIA part of DSA-3095-1)
> requires a new upstream version ... I expect as with the previous
> updates no DSA will be issued for non-free packages.
+- Added suppo
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Jonathan Wiltshire (2014-12-13):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: d-i
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package mdadm to fix an RC bug and bring in other fixes.
>
> I've added an unblock hint,
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #773073 [release.debian.org] unblock: mdadm/3.3.2-4
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
773073: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773073
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing changes file: c-icap_0.1.6-1.1+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: c-icap_0.1.6-1.1+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: c-icap_0.1.6-1.1+deb7u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: c-icap_0.1.6-1.1+deb7u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing c
Control: tags -1 +confirmed -moreinfo
On Sun, 2014-12-14 at 21:01 +, Jo Shields wrote:
> On 14/12/14 19:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 16:03 +, Jo Shields wrote:
> >> I need to make a TPU upload of MonoDevelop, to fix RC bug #77151
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +confirmed -moreinfo
Bug #772734 [release.debian.org] unblock: monodevelop/4.0.12+dfsg-6
Added tag(s) confirmed.
Bug #772734 [release.debian.org] unblock: monodevelop/4.0.12+dfsg-6
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
772734: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
On 14/12/14 19:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 16:03 +, Jo Shields wrote:
>> I need to make a TPU upload of MonoDevelop, to fix RC bug #771515 (and
>> an identical bug which popped up during testing). Going via unstable
>> is no longer possibl
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Apologies for the delay, I appear to have missed this mail.
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 11:42 +0100, Jonathan Dupart wrote:
> * Adam D. Barratt [141126 00:25]:
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 15:03 +0100, Jonathan Dupart wrote:
> > >
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Bug #770955 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package
openvswitch/1.4.2+git20120612-9.1~deb7u1.1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #770955 to the same tags previously set
Bug #770955 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package
openvswitch
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #772734 [release.debian.org] unblock: monodevelop/4.0.12+dfsg-6
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #772734 to the same tags previously set
--
772734: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772734
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contac
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Wed, 2014-12-10 at 16:03 +, Jo Shields wrote:
> I need to make a TPU upload of MonoDevelop, to fix RC bug #771515 (and
> an identical bug which popped up during testing). Going via unstable
> is no longer possible, due to major version changes numbering
> thousan
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 01:32:59PM +0100, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Right now, the package is only installable on systems that do not have the
> linux-image meta-package installed and are very likely to in a chroot. So
> that eliminates the majority of Debian installs as candidates where thi
Jonathan Wiltshire, le Fri 12 Dec 2014 21:37:10 +, a écrit :
> This discussion seems to have run into the sand.
Indeed.
> Is there any news?
Well, nothing more than what was said, actually, to sum it up:
- MATE is a bit more accessible than Gnome with the Orca screen reader
- MATE however d
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package poedit
As per irc conversation, I would like to get a preupproved ack for the poedit
unblock.
Unblock asked for policy violation 12.5, a.k.a. missing copyright entr
Your message dated Sun, 14 Dec 2014 16:17:29 +
with message-id <1418573849.30230.4.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#773093: unblock: python-gevent/1.0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #773093,
regarding unblock: python-gevent/1.0.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sun, 14 Dec 2014 16:13:48 +
with message-id <1418573628.30230.3.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#773064: unblock: gnome-menus/3.13.3-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #773064,
regarding unblock: gnome-menus/3.13.3-5
to be marked as done.
This means that y
On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 20:33 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> 31st / 1st - Fine for me
I spotted earlier that that weekend is FOSDEM, which presumably changes
the answer for at least some people.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 12/12/2014 05:40 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> The attached proposal seems reasonable. Please remove the moreinfo tag when
> you need some action from us.
Hi there!
It took me a little longer than expected to have it right: the previous
debdiff wasn't full correct, I believe it is now. I had
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 771929 -moreinfo
Bug #771929 [release.debian.org] (pre-approved) unblock: openstack-pkg-tools/20
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
771929: http://bugs.debian.or
Your message dated Sun, 14 Dec 2014 16:40:49 +0100
with message-id <20141214154049.ga28...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#773113: unblock: shaarli/0.0.42~beta~dfsg1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #773113,
regarding unblock: shaarli/0.0.42~beta~dfsg1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that
Hi,
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> In theory the 7.8 point release should be in December, but that's often
> a pain to organise. So let's look at January instead:
>
> 3rd / 4th - I'm busy on the Saturday
> 10th / 11th - Fine for me
> 17th / 18th - jmw's BSP
> 24th / 25th - I can do Saturday morning,
X-Debbugs-CC: tryton-deb...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release managers,
please approve the upload of tryton-server_3.4.0-3.
This little fix corrects the piupart error at
https://piupar
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team members,
Please unblock package shaarli
This package provides a web application. The application creates a data file
and cached files in specific folders.
Until version
Hello,
On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 13:40:49 +0100
Michael Biebl wrote:
> This patch should probably be extended and the
> 'ip link set "$iface" up || true' call guarded with a check for the
> network interface, otherwise we'll generate an error message for
> interfaces which aren't available during boot
Am 14.12.2014 um 13:10 schrieb Andrew Shadura:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package ifupdown
>
> The last upload has broken some things, so I need to unbreak them back.
>
> This patch should
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 unblock: gnome-menus/3.13.3-5
Bug #773064 [release.debian.org] unblock: gnome-menus/3.13.3-4
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: gnome-menus/3.13.3-5' from 'unblock:
gnome-menus/3.13.3-4'
--
773064: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773064
Deb
Control: retitle -1 unblock: gnome-menus/3.13.3-5
Le dimanche 14 décembre 2014 à 13:13 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> Please wait for a newer upload, there’s a typo in the upstream patch.
There you go.
gnome-menus (3.13.3-5) unstable; urgency=medium
* 30_xdg_syntax.patch: fix typo in the
intrigeri:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote (12 Dec 2014 12:32:59 GMT) :
>>> First of all, please don't break threads.
>
>> Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by this.
>
> I think that Ivo meant that your previous email
> (<54874ee7.9020...@eds.org>) was a reply to his
> (<20141119190826.ga1
Hi,
Le samedi 13 décembre 2014 à 22:37 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> * 30_xdg_syntax.patch: patch from upstream git. Support multiple
> desktops in XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP. Closes: #773013.
Please wait for a newer upload, there’s a typo in the upstream patch.
Thanks,
--
.''`. Jos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Am 14.12.2014 um 00:24 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire:
> Normally this wouldn't even be up for discussion for a package that
> was removed in July and only fixed in November. But I think people
> might be surprised that we shipped without a working quota
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ifupdown
The last upload has broken some things, so I need to unbreak them back.
This patch should enable the boot process to continue even when the link
isn't avail
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 12:58 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS)
wrote:
> The "patches" remove and remove2 were for some local testing for
> myself. Those were removed as patches and _not_ present in any
> uploaded versions.
Shame on me. I left those in as well. :( Please ignore them, those
should not
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #773093 [release.debian.org] unblock: python-gevent/1.0.1-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
773093: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773093
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Adam,
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-12-14 at 09:24 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
>> Please unblock python-gevent which fixes #770616 [1]. It's a FTBFS due
>> to the SSLv3 removal and the solution is to use the v2 f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Bas,
Am 14.12.2014 um 00:24 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 10:26:59PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
>> Could you please state if you would approve to update the
>> quotatool package via testing-proposed-updates, as there is a
>>
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 20:49:02 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2014-12-03 20:41, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> >> + * openmpi-common: Set Multi-Arch: foreign. (Closes: #769378)
> >>
> >> Maybe a small step towards multiarch, harmless on native.
> >
> > Mmmm, I'm not keen on the multi-arch t
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #773093 [release.debian.org] unblock: python-gevent/1.0.1-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
773093: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773093
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sun, 2014-12-14 at 09:24 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
> Please unblock python-gevent which fixes #770616 [1]. It's a FTBFS due
> to the SSLv3 removal and the solution is to use the v2 fallback.
Why does it also change the Build-Depends, adding dh-python wi
Your message dated Sun, 14 Dec 2014 11:56:23 +0100
with message-id <20141214105623.gb16...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#771148: (pre-upload) unblock: pypy/2.4.0+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #771148,
regarding (pre-upload) unblock: pypy/2.4.0+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 10:17:37AM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Did you also request binNMUs for reverse dependencies?
I didn't, because I was under the impression that dose3 didn't have any
reverse dependencies. I see now that there is at least "ceve". My bad.
If you have handy a full list of rev
Le 2014-12-12 16:52, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dose3
Did you also request binNMUs for reverse dependencies?
--
Mehdi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rele
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi Release Team,
Please unblock python-gevent which fixes #770616 [1]. It's a FTBFS due
to the SSLv3 removal and the solution is to use the v2 fallback.
Debdiff is attached.
Thanks,
Laszlo
57 matches
Mail list logo
