Hi,
there were quite some l10n uploads lately, a bunch of which I have just
urgented (after having checked the actual diff against testing using 'd'
on release.d.o) to get them into testing and to get them out of my radar:
http://d-i.debian.org/testing-summary.html
I'll probably be performing
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 15:02:58 -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > > The delay ended but the signature seems invalid:
> > >
> > > 20140919160333|process-upload|dak|mapnik-vector-tile_0.5.1+dfsg-1.1_multi.changes|Error
> > > while loading ch
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> You actually need breaks/replaces against libsidplayfp in libsidplayfp3,
> because of the broken libsidplayfp version in testing that also includes
> libsidplayfp.so.3.
Ah, I can remember now why I had the transition package. Anyway, the
di
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On 2014-09-20 20:02, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> >Robert Edmonds wrote:
> >>Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >>> The delay ended but the signature seems invalid:
> >>>
> >>> 20140919160333|process-upload|dak|mapnik-vector-tile_0.5.1+dfsg-1.1_multi.changes|Error
> >>> while lo
On 2014-09-20 20:02, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> The delay ended but the signature seems invalid:
>
>
20140919160333|process-upload|dak|mapnik-vector-tile_0.5.1+dfsg-1.1_multi.changes|Error
> while loading changes: No valid signature found. (GPG e
Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > The delay ended but the signature seems invalid:
> >
> > 20140919160333|process-upload|dak|mapnik-vector-tile_0.5.1+dfsg-1.1_multi.changes|Error
> > while loading changes: No valid signature found. (GPG exited with status
> > code 512)
> >
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 12:59:31PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We're (over)due another wheezy point release; this time, 7.7. I propose
>we go for one of:
>
>11/12 October
>18/19 October
I can manage either of these
>25/26 October
but this is a no-no; I'm at the GSOC mentors' meeting in Ca
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #750010 [release.debian.org] pu: package mlmmj/1.2.18.1-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
750010: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750010
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #725154 [release.debian.org] pu: package oss-compat/2+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
725154: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725154
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 23:08 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Upstream for MLMMJ has released a bugfix version correcting
> a few bugs, one of which is the loss of some emails in some
> cases, which is IMO bad enough to deserve a correction in
> Debian Stable.
Apologies f
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Apologies for the long delay in getting back to you.
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 22:59 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:29:00 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt"
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 07:52 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > > oss-compat in stable suffers
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #740435 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package arandr/0.1.7.1-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
740435: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740435
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCR
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #746927 [release.debian.org] pu: net-snmp/5.4.3~dfsg-2.8+deb7u1 (Bug#721224
snmpd: produces error if the Executables/scripts entries in snmpd.conf is over
50)
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
746927: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Apologies for the delay in getting back to you.
On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 15:29 +0100, chrysn wrote:
> i'd like to upload a new version of arandr to stable.
>
> arandr versions before 0.1.7.1, as described in bug #718366 (originally
> #507521), completely fail to work wit
Processing control commands:
> tags 725661 +confirmed -moreinfo
Bug #725661 [release.debian.org] pu: opencv/2.3.1+dfsg-1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
Bug #725661 [release.debian.org] pu: opencv/2.3.1+dfsg-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
724920: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724920
72
Processing control commands:
> tags 725661 +confirmed -moreinfo
Bug #725661 [release.debian.org] pu: opencv/2.3.1+dfsg-1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #725661 to the same tags previously set
Bug #725661 [release.debian.org] pu: opencv/2.3.1+dfsg-1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #725
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed - moreinfo
Bug #743156 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package
ca-certificates/20130119+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
Bug #743156 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package
ca-certificates/20130119+deb7u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
743156: http
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 10:44 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> I'd like to upload net-snmp/5.4.3~dfsg-2.8+deb7u1 to stable-proposed-updates
> to fix Bug#721224, error happens when Executables/scripts entries is over 50
> in snmpd.conf.
Apologies for the delay in getting
Control: tags 725661 +confirmed -moreinfo
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 09:02 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Most of the files in modules/gpu/test/nvidia/ is DFSG Non-free.
> They are also provided the latest OpenCV, but the license was changed by
> commit f0b19d4659045b00c55f849187cd657b21a13e5d.
> It
Control: tags -1 + confirmed - moreinfo
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 21:36 -0500, Michael Shuler wrote:
> On 08/24/2014 02:12 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On 2014-03-31 1:25, Michael Shuler wrote:
> >> I would like to upload ca-certificates to stable to include one important
> >> patch to fix duplicate
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #726558 [release.debian.org] pu: package policykit-1/0.105-3+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
726558: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726558
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBS
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #760282 [release.debian.org] nmu: scotch_5.1.12b.dfsg-1.2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
760282: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760282
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 18:06:25 +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> > In a SONAME change you absolutely do not want users of the old SONAME
> > package (libdisplayfp) building against the new SONAME (libdisplayfp3).
> > That's why you have a -dev package in the first place. See libinput for
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 18:41:29 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> As discussed in [1], I'd like to upload a fix for CVE-2013-4288 for
> policykit-1 to stable.
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 760003 + moreinfo
Bug #760003 [release.debian.org] transition: qt-gstreamer
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
760003: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=7600
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 15:53:40 -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been working with hartmans to get some updates to krb5 into Debian (he
>> is pretty busy these days, and I'm at upstream). A couple of issues are
>> serio
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 15:53:40 -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been working with hartmans to get some updates to krb5 into Debian (he
> is pretty busy these days, and I'm at upstream). A couple of issues are
> serious enough that I think they merit being fixed in stable:
>
> #
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 16:29:45 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> I guess this request is quite unfortunate as it affects a rebuild of a
> ppackage in stable. Note I'm not the maintainer but we runned into
> this problem.
>
> It is tracked in BTS as #748130. The bin
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On 2014-09-20 10:39, László Böszörményi wrote:
>> Next time should I just leave libsidplay on the system as an empty
>> package without informing users (without the transition) it has a new
>> library package?
>
> No, libsidplayfp needs
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 02:20:23AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 19/09/14 21:16, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:55:18PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:21:34PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 2014-09-20 10:39, László Böszörményi wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Julien Cristau
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 07:27:54 +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS)
wrote:
The audacious and related packages are in a good shape, only the
binNMU needed for audacious-plugins to the libsidplay
Processing changes file: dbus_1.6.8-1+deb7u4_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.6.8-1+deb7u4_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.6.8-1+deb7u4_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.6.8-1+deb7u4_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbu
Hello!
2014-09-17 22:57 GMT+03:00 Moritz Mühlenhoff :
> Has there been any progress? The freeze is coming closer.
Both MySQL 5.6 and MariaDB 10.0 are still only in experimental. The
5.5 versions are in testing and functional and well tested, so it
looks like that those will go to Jessie.
>From c
Adam D. Barratt (2014-09-20):
> We're (over)due another wheezy point release; this time, 7.7. I
> propose we go for one of:
>
> 11/12 October
> 18/19 October
> 25/26 October
As far as rebuilding/testing d-i is concerned, any of those should be
just fine.
Reminds me I have some pending p-u. ;-)
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 12:53:54 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:45:00AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 22:29:10 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >
> > > Hi release team,
> > > dpkg-buildflags was switched to the strong stack protector on
Hi,
We're (over)due another wheezy point release; this time, 7.7. I propose
we go for one of:
11/12 October
18/19 October
25/26 October
Cheers,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
On 2014-09-15 15:02, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Hi Niels, Release Team,
>
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2014-09-05 06:32, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>>
>> Hi Felipe / Pulseaudio maintainers,
>>
>> I apologise for the tardiness on our part. Thanks for bringing
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:45:00AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 22:29:10 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> > Hi release team,
> > dpkg-buildflags was switched to the strong stack protector on
> > the 10th of August. Many security-sensitive packages have already
> > bee
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 07:27:54 +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>> The audacious and related packages are in a good shape, only the
>> binNMU needed for audacious-plugins to the libsidplayfp ->
>> libsidplayfp3 transition. Please s
Processing changes file: libsnmp-session-perl_1.13-1.1~deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xvgmw-0006mq...@franck.debian
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #760558 [release.debian.org] pu: package libsnmp-session-perl/1.13-1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
760558: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760558
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Control: tag -1 pending
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 21:08:45 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 23:46 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:26:13 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [...]
> > > I'd like to fix #628804 in stable, which causes a lot of noise from mr
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 22:29:10 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Hi release team,
> dpkg-buildflags was switched to the strong stack protector on
> the 10th of August. Many security-sensitive packages have already
> been uploaded to unstable since then and I'm tracking which are
> missing.
>
>
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 07:27:54 +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Sebastian Ramacher
> wrote:
> >> > > László Böszörményi (GCS) (2014-08-23):
> >> > >> libsidplayfp has a new upstream release with a new soname. The library
> >> > >> package name changes f
44 matches
Mail list logo
