Processed: mayavi2: Please update to use wxpython3.0

Processing control commands: > block 755757 by -1 Bug #755757 [release.debian.org] transition: wxpython3.0 755757 was blocked by: 757755 757306 758436 757431 734799 757429 758507 758695 757289 758714 757308 757434 757304 758499 757886 757313 757299 758846 758204 755757 was not blocking any bugs.

Processed: spe: Please update to use wxpython3.0

Processing control commands: > block 755757 by -1 Bug #755757 [release.debian.org] transition: wxpython3.0 755757 was blocked by: 758436 757306 757755 757431 734799 757429 758507 757289 758695 758714 757308 757434 757304 758939 758499 757886 757313 757299 758846 758204 755757 was not blocking an

Bug#753529: transition: perl 5.20

On 2014-07-02 Niko Tyni wrote: [...] > We'd like to get Perl 5.20 in jessie, so I guess it's best to push this > on the radar now. [...] Hello, I have wondered about what stopped this from being finished. Looking at https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/perl5.20.html the only thing marke

Bug#758249: transition: liblas

On 08/21/2014 06:09 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > 5) binNMU pktools Once the mips build is done in a couple of days, I think dep-wait requests for the BD-Uninstallable architectures should be used just in case the GDAL build is fixed in the mean time. I think the syntax for the nmu and dw commands sho

Packages becoming uninstallable in jessie?

Hi, we all know that Haskell packages tend to become uninstallable in unstable, but until now I thought that britney will ensure that installable packages in testing stay installable. We have a jenkins job ensuring this (simply by trying to install all haskell packages), but today it started fail

Re: Sources required by Built-Using break multiple assumptions?

Hello Guillem, Guillem Jover (2014-08-22): > Hi! > > I was mightily confused when I saw that supposedly dpkg 1.17.12, which > had an RC bug filed and had not spent enough time to transition had > “migrated” [M], w/o any sign of MIGRATION mail, nor any release team > hint directive. > > This is

Sources required by Built-Using break multiple assumptions?

Hi! I was mightily confused when I saw that supposedly dpkg 1.17.12, which had an RC bug filed and had not spent enough time to transition had “migrated” [M], w/o any sign of MIGRATION mail, nor any release team hint directive. This is what rmadison has to say about this: ,--- dpkg | 1.17.10 |

Bug#755539: transition: hdf5

Le vendredi 22 août 2014 à 10:03 +0200, Gilles Filippini a écrit : > = binNMU required = > octave-communications Note that this binNMU needs to be done after octave's binNMU. -- .''`.Sébastien Villemot : :' :Debian Developer `. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien `- GPG Key:

Bug#755539: transition: hdf5

Gilles Filippini a écrit , Le 20/08/2014 19:50: > Gilles Filippini a écrit , Le 15/08/2014 20:59: >> = Package ready = >> cmor >> flann >> gnuplot-iostream >> gpiv >> gpivtools >> magics++ >> octave-bim >> octave-msh >> pktools >> pygpiv >> python-shogun >> syrthes >> vtk >> >> = Useless build depe

Bug#758819: marked as done (nmu: libvirt_1.2.7-10)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:58:01 +0200 with message-id <53f6f809.30...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#758819: nmu: libvirt_1.2.7-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #758819, regarding nmu: libvirt_1.2.7-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#757575: transition: libgcrypt20

Hi! the incompatibility with libgnutls26 can be fixed by using the patch below. We use this in Gpg4win. (patches/gnutls-2.12.23/fix-gcrypt-private-api-usage.patch) Salam-Shalom, Werner #! /bin/sh patch -p0 -l -f $* < $0 exit $? 2014-08-06 Andre Heinecke * lib/gcrypt/init.c: Us