Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 757799 wheezy-pu: package xdg-utils/1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6+deb7u1
Bug #757799 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package
xdg-utils/1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6.1
Changed Bug title to 'wheezy-pu: package
xdg-utils/1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6+deb7u1'
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #758492 [release.debian.org] RM: lcms/1.19.dfsg2-1.5
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
758492: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758492
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2014-08-18 05:30, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
> Severity: normal
>
> Please remove src:lcms from testing. Some reverse dependencies still
> need to be migrated to lcms2 (see #71792
Hey Adam,
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 06:15:36PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 14:42 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > +xdg-utils (1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6.1) wheezy; urgency=low
> > +
> > + * Non-maintainer upload.
> > + * Add fix-bashis
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please remove src:lcms from testing. Some reverse dependencies still
need to be migrated to lcms2 (see #717928).
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.de
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:52:55AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 17/08/14 22:06, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 16/08/14 02:55, James McCoy wrote:
> >> “apxs2 -q CC” currently reports i486-linux-gnu-gcc on i386, but binutils
> >> no longer ships that. This is causing the rebuild
On 17/08/14 22:06, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 16/08/14 02:55, James McCoy wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: binnmu
>>
>> nmu apache2_2.4.10-1 . i386 . -m "Rebuild for new arch triplet,
>> i586-linux-gnu"
>
Your message dated Sun, 17 Aug 2014 22:06:24 +0200
with message-id <53f10b40.1060...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#758265: nmu: apache2_2.4.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #758265,
regarding nmu: apache2_2.4.10-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Hi,
About imagemagick transition:
a. I have tried to compile every dependency [1] in pbuilder
b. Every package work except:
1. gnudatalanguage has a dependency problem due to a virtual
package (b-d uninstable)
2. [pythonmagick] FTBFS with new (experimental) imagemagick
version BUT a newer
Processing control commands:
> block 740495 by -1
Bug #740495 [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick
740495 was blocked by: 747857 758435 758001 747907 746228 747908 758443
740495 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 740495: 758459
--
740495: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 755212 + pending
Bug #755212 [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf-c
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
755212: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755212
D
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #754446 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: fix #609457 in supervisor package
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
754446: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754446
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Hi,
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 08:42 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> The init script of supervisor in wheezy is broken (I tend to call
> the package unusable for any system that includes automated
> configuration management and m
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 14:42 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> +xdg-utils (1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6.1) wheezy; urgency=low
> +
> + * Non-maintainer upload.
> + * Add fix-bashism-use-of-echo.patch patch.
> +Instead of using echo -e in xdg-email use directly /bin/
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #757799 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package
xdg-utils/1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6.1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
757799: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757799
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro
On 11/08/14 09:44, Reto Buerki wrote:
> Hi Emilio
>
> On 08/10/2014 04:54 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> The last blockers are #756081 and #755076. Can someone from debian-ada take a
>> look at those?
>
> Thanks for the ping. I will transition all my packages to gnat-4.9 this
> week (hopefu
Processing control commands:
> block 756078 by -1
Bug #756078 [release.debian.org] transition: gnat 4.9
756078 was blocked by: 755014 756081 755016 755076 755009 753955 753957
756078 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 756078: 757574
--
756078: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Processing control commands:
> block 740495 by -1
Bug #740495 [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick
740495 was blocked by: 758435 747857 758001 747907 746228 747908
740495 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 740495: 758443
--
740495: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Processing control commands:
> block 755757 by -1
Bug #755757 [release.debian.org] transition: wxpython3.0
755757 was blocked by: 757308 757755 757306 757431 757434 734799 757429 757304
757886 757289 757313 757299 758204
755757 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 755757: 758436
-
Processing control commands:
> block 740495 by -1
Bug #740495 [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick
740495 was blocked by: 747857 758001 747907 746228 747908
740495 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 740495: 758435
--
740495: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu proftpd-mod-dnsbl_0.1.5-3+b4 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against proftpd-dfsg
1.3.5-1"
Package still depends on proftpd-abi-1.3.5rc4
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT pref
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu proftpd-mod-clamav_0.10-1+b3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against proftpd-dfsg
1.3.5-1"
Package still depends on proftpd-abi-1.3.5rc4
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT pref
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu proftpd-mod-case_0.7-1+b2 . ALL . -m "rebuild against proftpd-basic 1.3.5-1"
Package still depends on proftpd-abi-1.3.5rc4
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefer
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu proftpd-mod-autohost_0.4-1+b3 . ALL . -m "rebuild against proftpd-basic
1.3.5-1"
proftpd-mod-autohost still depends on proftpd-abi-1.3.5rc4
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie
On 2014-08-16 16:54:20, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Ah, and one more:
>
> On 2014-08-13 21:07:42, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > amarok build deps uninstallable
>
> Looks like a consequence of #747536.
I've uploaded a NMU fixing #747536. After fixing #758412 in amarok, it
build fines against libav
severity 758282 important
unblock 753529 with 758282
thanks
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 02:30:15PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Niko Tyni 2014-08-16 <20140816092217.GA2953@estella.local.invalid>
> > Package: postgresql-9.3
> > Version: 9.3.4-2
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Rebuilding this packa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 758282 important
Bug #758282 [postgresql-9.3] postgresql-9.3: FTBFS on sparc: 1 of 136 tests
failed
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> unblock 753529 with 758282
Bug #753529 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.20
753529 wa
Hi,
Find attached patch that fixes a minor regression introduced in commit
a46dd88 by yours truly. I intend to merge into master in a couple of
days if no one beats me to it. I have added a new test case
(regression-a46dd88) for the particular patch.
The regression causes certain (unlikely) hin
28 matches
Mail list logo
