On Sat, 2014-08-09 at 11:49 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Why is that? Did libpcre break the ABI without bumping the SONAME? Did it
> change
> something else in an incompatible way? Is that something supposed to be public
> and used by rdeps? Do we need stricter dependencies in rdeps to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 744171 with 757540 757542
Bug #744171 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults
744171 was blocked by: 751691 749944
744171 was blocking: 749749
Added blocking bug(s) of 744171: 757540 and 757542
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Ple
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: x...@packages.debian.org
It looks like xdmf was built in an unclean environment by the uploader.
It has a dependency on libhdf5-8 which is only available in
experimental. Please
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I would like to make sure that we only ship one gcrypt version in
jessie and am therefore opening the transition tracker now.
libgcrypt20 is mostly API compatible to libgcrypt11.
Hello!
On 09/25/2013 05:09 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
> to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
>
> For sh4, I
> - test packages on this architecture
> - triage arch-specific bugs
> - fix arch-related bugs
> -
On 09/08/14 05:16, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> X-Debbugs-Cc: Kartik Mistry
>
> The recent pcre3 update has caused apertium to start segfaulting because
> the language data packages need to be
6 matches
Mail list logo
