Processing changes file: exim4_4.80-7+deb7u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xackv-0007lv...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: exim4_4.80-7+deb7u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xabrt-0004i3...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: exim4_4.80-7+deb7u1_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1xaasn-0003ns...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: exim4_4.80-7+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: exim4_4.80-7+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: exim4_4.80-7+deb7u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: exim4_4.80-7+deb7u1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: exi
Processing changes file: exim4_4.80-7+deb7u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: exim4_4.80-7+deb7u1_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archi
Processing changes file: acpi-support_0.140-5+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: acpi-support_0.140-5+deb7u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: acpi-support_0.140-5+deb7u1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: exim4_4.80-7+deb7u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Proces
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 11:16:17PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Please reconsider adding packages with the attached three minimal patches for
> dpkg, apt and python-apt to backports. In contrast to a full backport these
> patches add the ability to parse the new build profile syntax with m
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 18:46 -0300, Raúl Benencia wrote:
> I would like to see foremost 1.5.7-5 in wheezy in order to fix #753184,
You can't do that as described, as -5 is already in unstable/testing.
However...
> which is causing a FTBFS. The fix is quite trivial, an
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #755850 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package foremost/1.5.7-5
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
755850: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755850
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBS
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear release team,
I would like to see foremost 1.5.7-5 in wheezy in order to fix #753184,
which is causing a FTBFS. The fix is quite trivial, and it's been in
unstable since a coup
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 20:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 18:12 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > exim 4.83 includes a fix for a minor security issue (local privilege
> > escalation to exim user) which I would like to fix for stable. I have
> > al
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #755712 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package exim4/4.80-7
Added tag(s) pending.
--
755712: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755712
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 19:47 +0200, Julian Taylor wrote:
> On 19.07.2014 17:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 13:51:46 +0200, Julian Taylor wrote:...
> >> I would like to update ipython in wheezy to fix CVE-2014-3429
> >> It is a remote execution flaw
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #755263 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package ipython/0.13.1-2+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
755263: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755263
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNS
Processing changes file: drupal7_7.14-2+deb7u5_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-activerecord-3.2_3.2.6-5+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
Am 23.07.2014 15:07, schrieb Olly Betts:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:10:19PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Am 23.07.2014 03:38, schrieb Olly Betts:
>>> The intention is to eliminate wxwidgets2.8 (and hence wxpython 2.8) before
>>> releasing jessie - the last upstream release (2.8.12) was over 3
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:10:19PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 23.07.2014 03:38, schrieb Olly Betts:
> > The intention is to eliminate wxwidgets2.8 (and hence wxpython 2.8) before
> > releasing jessie - the last upstream release (2.8.12) was over 3 years ago,
> > and there's very little upstr
severity 755498 important
thanks
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Looking at #700026, filed by Ansgar, that was just a normal bug
> (which you bumped to important).
hm, ok, downgrading this one accordingly.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Am 23.07.2014 03:38, schrieb Olly Betts:
> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
> release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: block
> -1 by 734799
>
> This is a follow-on from the wxwidgets3.0 transition. The wxwidgets2.8
> source package actually contains
> The progressive depreciation and clear schedule and instructions given by
> upstream makes it not too difficult to "upgrade" to newer Django versions.
> So I don't really buy your argument Thomas. Have you just tried to run
> it with Django 1.7?
That might be true that django has a clear deprec
Holger Levsen (2014-07-23):
> Hi,
>
> shall I tag bugs like #755498 wheezy-ignore?
>
> #755498: elilo: Add a Built-Using field for gnu-efi -
>
> jcristau suggested to just downgrade them, but I seem to recall a
> consensus those shall be serious bugs indeed? (Doesnt the ftp team
> want those a
Hi Raphael,
I do understand and agree with your maintainability and upstream
security support argumentation. But there's still some issues we'll have
to address (see below).
On 07/23/2014 02:01 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> So I don't really buy your argument Thomas. Have you just tried to run
> i
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/wxpython3.0.html
Bug #755757 [release.debian.org] transition: wxpython3.0
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/wxpython3.0.html'.
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #755757 [releas
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/wxpython3.0.html
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 23/07/14 03:38, Olly Betts wrote:
> This should be a "smooth transition", as the packages for wxpython 2.8
> and 3.0 are co-installable.
That's great!
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
24 matches
Mail list logo
