I have now NMUed guymager with the maintainer's permission, and I've
delayed-5-NMUed partitionmanager. parted 3.1-2 is in experimental and
has built everywhere except mips (not a build failure, it's just sitting
in Needs-Build - given that it built fine on mipsel I don't anticipate a
problem there
On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 11:17 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 17:48 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > A kernel ABI bump is needed to enable:
> >
> > - [powerpc] CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
> > - [powerpc/powerpc64] CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL
> > - CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG
> >
> > I propose to
On 19.07.2014 17:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 13:51:46 +0200, Julian Taylor wrote:...
>> I would like to update ipython in wheezy to fix CVE-2014-3429
>> It is a remote execution flaw via cross origin websockets, but one
>> requires a uuid from
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #755263 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package ipython/0.13.1-2+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
755263: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755263
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To U
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 13:51:46 +0200, Julian Taylor wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: wheezy
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> Hi release team
>
> I would like to update ipython in wheezy to fix CVE-2014-
On 07/19/2014 06:45 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 19:30 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 22:10 -0500, Michael Shuler wrote:
I would like to upload ca-certificates to oldstable to bring the Mozilla
CA bundle up to date, include one important patch to fix dup
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 05:01:38PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> as briefly discussed on #debian-release. Please remove this package
> in the 6.0.10 point release. It's not covered by squeeze-lts support
> and debian-security-support marks existing packages as deprecated.
Why the maintai
Processing changes file: davfs2_1.4.6-1.1+squeeze1_amd64.changes
REJECT
Processing changes file: davfs2_1.4.6-1.1+squeeze1_armel.changes
REJECT
Processing changes file: davfs2_1.4.6-1.1+squeeze1_i386.changes
REJECT
Processing changes file: davfs2_1.4.6-1.1+squeeze1_ia64.changes
REJECT
Proce
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi release team
I would like to update ipython in wheezy to fix CVE-2014-3429
It is a remote execution flaw via cross origin websockets, but one
requires a uuid from the process in
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 12:46:09 +0100
with message-id <1405770369.9607.17.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#707550: opu: package php-mdb2/2.5.0b2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #707550,
regarding opu: package php-mdb2/2.5.0b2-1
to be marked as done.
Th
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 12:42:59 +0100
with message-id <1405770179.9607.15.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#687761: pu: package lvm2/2.02.66-5+squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687761,
regarding pu: package lvm2/2.02.66-5+squeeze1
to be marked as d
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 12:41:31 +0100
with message-id <1405770091.9607.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#725823: pu: package icedove/3.0.11-1+squeeze15
has caused the Debian Bug report #725823,
regarding pu: package icedove/3.0.11-1+squeeze15
to be marke
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 12:36:17 +0100
with message-id <1405769777.9607.9.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#755175: opu: package debdelta/0.39+squeeze2
has caused the Debian Bug report #755175,
regarding opu: package debdelta/0.39+squeeze2
to be marked as do
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 12:29:19 +0100
with message-id <1405769359.9607.4.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#742637: squeeze-pu: package spip/2.1.1-3squeeze9
has caused the Debian Bug report #742637,
regarding squeeze-pu: package spip/2.1.1-3squeeze9
to be ma
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
> usertags 755175 = pu
Usertags were: opu.
Usertags are now: pu.
> tags 755175 + squeeze
Bug #755175 [release.debia
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # The fixes discussed in these bugs were included in the 6.0.10 point release
> limit package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debia
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 17:48 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> A kernel ABI bump is needed to enable:
>
> - [powerpc] CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
> - [powerpc/powerpc64] CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL
> - CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG
>
> I propose to make these changes with the next upload to unstable.
>
> If anyone els
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 10:00:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#754836: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #754836,
regarding RM: libplrpc-perl/0.2020-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 10:00:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#754836: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #754836,
regarding RM: libplrpc-perl/0.2020-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:58:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#753502: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #753502,
regarding RM: spip -- RoST; security support ended
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:58:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#753503: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #753503,
regarding RM: zabbix -- RoST; security support ended
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:57:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#753501: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #753501,
regarding RM: serendipity -- RoST; security support ended
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:59:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#753504: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #753504,
regarding RM: openswan -- RoST; security support ended
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:57:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#753500: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #753500,
regarding RM: movabletype-opensource -- RoST; security support ended
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:56:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#753499: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #753499,
regarding RM: mantis -- RoST; security support ended
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:54:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#753496: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #753496,
regarding RM: fusionforge -- RoST; security support ended
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:54:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#753495: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #753495,
regarding RM: bugzilla -- RoST; security support ended
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:55:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#753498: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #753498,
regarding RM: mahara -- RoST; security support ended
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:54:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#753497: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #753497,
regarding RM: couchdb -- RoST; security support ended
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:52:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#752567: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #752567,
regarding RM: flashplugin-nonfree -- RoM; security issues
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:51:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#740546: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #740546,
regarding RM: hlbrw/0.2.4-1; removed from unstable, useless
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:52:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#740545: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #740545,
regarding RM: hlbr/1.7.2-2; removed from unstable, critical bugs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:53:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#753494: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #753494,
regarding RM: gksu-polkit -- RoST; security support ended
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:53:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#752883: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #752883,
regarding RM: whatsnewfm -- ROM; obsolete; abandoned upstream
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:51:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#638781: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #638781,
regarding RM: libgtfb -- RoQA; broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Hi Robert,
On 18/07/14 22:19, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> I am requesting an upload slot to upload protobuf-c 1.0.0-1 to unstable.
> I am hoping to accomplish a transition to protobuf-c 1.0.0 in time for
> the jessie release. (Disclaimer: I am also one of the protobuf-c
> upstream maintainers.) This
On 17/07/14 18:56, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Transition is due to upstream API change: replacement of
> 'hb_version_check' with 'hb_version_atleast'.
I see the package in NEW i
37 matches
Mail list logo
