Le 15/07/2014 23:55, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> No. Don't do it. This is complete bullshit for Debian at this point. We are
> trying to prepare a release, working on a possible update to Java 8, and we
> don't have the resources to work on Java 9 at this time.
Ok, but could you say it nicely ple
Am 15.07.2014 23:08, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> This was expected but now it's effective, Java 9 no longer supports
> source/target level 1.5:
>
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2014-July/000972.html
>
> So if you update a package and see these settings please bump them to 1.6.
>
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:41:21PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/perl5.20.html
>
> On 02/07/14 21:17, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transi
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20110106+squeeze4+b6_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20110106+squeeze4+b6_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20110106+squeeze4+b6_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_
On 2014-07-15 16:55, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
While doing some tries with britney2, I ended up with this exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
[...]
File "./britney.py", line 1864, in _compute_groups
smoothbins.add(check[p])
AttributeError: 'dict' object has no attribute 'add'
I c
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jul 2014 17:58:49 +0200
with message-id <20140715155848.ga20...@crater2.logilab.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#754887: [britney] AttributeError: 'dict' object has no
attribute 'add' (line 1864, in _compute_groups)
has caused the Debian Bug report #754887,
regarding [britne
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
While doing some tries with britney2, I ended up with this exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./britney.py", line 2770, in
Britney().main()
File "./britney.py", li
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 638781 RM: libgtfb -- RoQA; broken
Bug #638781 [release.debian.org] RM: libgtfb/0.1.0-1
Changed Bug title to 'RM: libgtfb -- RoQA; broken' from 'RM: libgtfb/0.1.0-1'
> tags 638781 + pending
Bug #638781 [release.debian.org] RM: libgtfb -- R
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> retitle 753494 RM: gksu-polkit -- RoST; security support ended
Bug #75
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # you are in a maze of twisty little bugs, all alike
> forcemerge 753444 753542
Bug #753444 {Done: Niko Tyni } [perl-base,release.debian.org]
perl-base - Segfaults in libperl.so.5.18
Bug #753592 {Done: Niko Tyni } [perl-base,release.debian.org]
Processing changes file: libdbi-perl_1.612-1+deb6u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: lighttpd_1.4.28-2+squeeze1.6_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 03:49:04AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:14:42PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> > glibc 2.19 has changed the libc ABI on
I think this is a matter of timing.
Mono (depending package of gdcm) has been hinted a couple of days ago and the
reverse-deps have been rebuilt yesterday (I think).
So it has migrated to testing only some hours ago. ddcm has migrated now to
testing, and I think in the next autoremovals run the
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 09:21:30AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:18:39AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I can follow up with a list affected packages, but we are slowly
> > discovering them one by one, so it might takes time. So far we have:
> >
> > * Mixing modules/lib
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:14:42PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> > glibc 2.19 has changed the libc ABI on s390, more specifically the
>> > setjmp/longjmp functions [1] [2]. Symbol
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 09:34:56AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> As the message states: 'gdcm 2.4.2-1'... which is IMHO correct. I
> guess the message could have been skipped to avoid a little noise.
This does not explain why some other packages (like gofigure2 and others
are marked for remova
As the message states: 'gdcm 2.4.2-1'... which is IMHO correct. I
guess the message could have been skipped to avoid a little noise.
2cts
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Release team,
>
> I wonder why gdcm is marked for autoremoval since the bug is fixed in
> testing a
Hi Release team,
I wonder why gdcm is marked for autoremoval since the bug is fixed in
testing and unstable. Am I missing something?
Gianfranco, Pino: Thanks a lot for your NMU!
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:39:10AM +, Debian testing autoremoval watch
wrote:
> g
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:18:39AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I can follow up with a list affected packages, but we are slowly
> discovering them one by one, so it might takes time. So far we have:
>
> * Mixing modules/libraries built with pre-2.19 and 2.19 libc
> - perl
> - libpng
>
> * Usi
19 matches
Mail list logo
