On 14/07/14 23:17, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:34:35AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 14/07/14 09:05, Niko Tyni wrote:
>
>>> So can I go ahead with dropping perlapi-5.18.2 or do we need to dig in
>>> the libimager-perl/libpng problem first?
>>
>> If you're ok with rem
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> It's a huge work for Debian, maybe not for other distribution, as it
> basically means we have to rebootstrap everything. This includes manual
> bootstrapping of self-dependent languages (haskell, gnat, ...) and
> manual handling of some dep
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:14:42PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > glibc 2.19 has changed the libc ABI on s390, more specifically the
> > setjmp/longjmp functions [1] [2]. Symbol versioning is used to handle
> > some cases, but it doesn't
Processing changes file: libdbi-perl_1.612-1+deb6u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1x6usn-0004xy...@franck.debian.org
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 08:10:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 17:00 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > as briefly discussed on #debian-release. Please remove this package
> > in the 6.0.10 point release. It's not covered by squeeze-lts support
> > and debian-se
Processing changes file: libdbi-perl_1.612-1+deb6u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1x6upk-nf...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: libdbi-perl_1.612-1+deb6u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdbi-perl_1.612-1+deb6u1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdbi-perl_1.612-1+deb6u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdbi-perl_1.612-1+deb6u1_kfreebsd-i386.c
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> glibc 2.19 has changed the libc ABI on s390, more specifically the
> setjmp/longjmp functions [1] [2]. Symbol versioning is used to handle
> some cases, but it doesn't work when a jmp_buf variable is embedded
> into a structure, as it change
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jul 2014 00:52:45 +0200
with message-id <53c45f3d.9030...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#747534: transition: libetpan
has caused the Debian Bug report #747534,
regarding transition: libetpan
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jul 2014 00:51:47 +0200
with message-id <53c45f03.5060...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#751525: transition: poppler 0.26
has caused the Debian Bug report #751525,
regarding transition: poppler 0.26
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
On 14/07/14 23:05, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Please schedule a binNMU for the following packages
>
> tracker
> mate-applets
> mate-power-manager
Scheduled.
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
Processing changes file: libdbi-perl_1.612-1+deb6u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1x6onq-0002zu...@franck.debian.org
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #754834 [release.debian.org] squeeze-pu: package libdbi-perl/1.612-1+deb6u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
754834: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754834
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 22:35 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:26:06PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 22:14 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > This is the corresponding proposed update for libdbi-perl as for
> >
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Guo Yixuan wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:00:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> > I would rather drop any package which does use c++11 features without
any
>> > reflection.
>>
>> I now unders
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:38:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#753444: fixed in perl 5.18.2-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #753444,
regarding interruption code 0x4003B in libperl.so.5.18.2[3fffcfff000+1d]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:38:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#753444: fixed in perl 5.18.2-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #753444,
regarding perl-base - Segfaults in libperl.so.5.18
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:34:35AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 14/07/14 09:05, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > So can I go ahead with dropping perlapi-5.18.2 or do we need to dig in
> > the libimager-perl/libpng problem first?
>
> If you're ok with removing libimager-perl, libimager-qrcode-per
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 753503 - moreinfo + pending
Bug #753503 [release.debian.org] RM: zabbix/1:1.8.2-1squeeze5
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #753503 [release.debian.org] RM: zabbix/1:1.8.2-1squeeze5
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Please schedule a binNMU for the following packages
tracker
mate-applets
mate-power-manager
All other packages need sourceful uploads (or removal from testing).
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Descrip
Hi Adam,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:26:06PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 22:14 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > This is the corresponding proposed update for libdbi-perl as for
> > wheezy, see [1], in case I'm still in time for squeez
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 754837 754836
Bug #754837 [release.debian.org] RM: libplrpc-perl/0.2020-2
Bug #754836 [release.debian.org] RM: libplrpc-perl/0.2020-2
Added tag(s) squeeze and pending.
Merged 754836 754837
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 754836 RM: libplrpc-perl/0.2020-2
Bug #754836 [release.debian.org] RM: libplrpc-perl/0.2020-2Hi
Changed Bug title to 'RM: libplrpc-perl/0.2020-2' from 'RM:
libplrpc-perl/0.2020-2Hi'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Hi all,
glibc 2.19 has changed the libc ABI on s390, more specifically the
setjmp/longjmp functions [1] [2]. Symbol versioning is used to handle
some cases, but it doesn't work when a jmp_buf variable is embedded
into a structure, as it changes the size of the structure. The result
is that mixing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 752236 -1
Bug #752236 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[release.debian.org] RM: libplrpc-perl/0.2020-2
Bug 752236 cloned as bug 754837
> reopen -1
Bug #754837 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[release.debian.org] RM: libplrpc-perl/0.2020-2
Bug reope
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #754834 [release.debian.org] squeeze-pu: package libdbi-perl/1.612-1+deb6u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
754834: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754834
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
-
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 22:14 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> This is the corresponding proposed update for libdbi-perl as for
> wheezy, see [1], in case I'm still in time for squeeze-pu. Attached is
> proposed debdiff for squeeze. libplrpc-perl was removed from the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: squeeze
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi release team
This is the corresponding proposed update for libdbi-perl as for
wheezy, see [1], in case I'm still in time for squeeze-pu. Attached is
proposed debdiff for squeeze
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:40:42 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 13/07/14 20:12, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 03:19:51PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> >> - libsereal-* FTBFS on various architectures and are perfect removal
> >> candidates from testing (#742409 and #7
On 13/07/14 20:12, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 03:19:51PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
>> - libsereal-* FTBFS on various architectures and are perfect removal
>> candidates from testing (#742409 and #750770).
>> hm, except that libsession-storage-secure-perl depends on them
Hi,
On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 17:00 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> as briefly discussed on #debian-release. Please remove this package
> in the 6.0.10 point release. It's not covered by squeeze-lts support
> and debian-security-support marks existing packages as deprecated.
How much were the deci
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 transition: gnome 3.12
Bug #740137 [release.debian.org] transition: gnome-desktop3
Changed Bug title to 'transition: gnome 3.12' from 'transition: gnome-desktop3'
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #740137 [release.debian.org] transition: gnome 3.12
Added tag(s) conf
Control: retitle -1 transition: gnome 3.12
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 25/05/14 13:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> A status update.
>
> On 06/04/14 02:04, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 24/03/14 23:04, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 07:21:38PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 06:50:54PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > Can you upload parted to experimental first? That will automatically give
> > us a
> > transition tracker, and avoid NEW once the transition is acked.
>
> Wi
Processing control commands:
> block 754582 by -1
Bug #754582 [release.debian.org] transition: parted
754582 was blocked by: 738923 753121 754580
754582 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 754582: 754812
--
754582: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754582
754812: h
Hi,
while going through packages with out of date binaries[1], I noticed
that parrot dropped libparrot6.0.0; it's seen in the cruft report[2] but
it can't go away since rakudo depends on it. It looks to me like rakudo
could benefit from a binNMU on amd64?
1. http://release.debian.org/britney/up
Processing changes file: nostalgy_0.2.32-1_amd64.changes
REJECT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1x6fer-0004i4...@franck.debian.org
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 01:16:05PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2014-07-14 13:02, Debian Queue Viewer wrote:
> >Version in base suite: 0.2.31-1~deb7u1
> >Version in overlay suite: (not present)
> >
> >Base version: nostalgy_0.2.31-1~deb7u1
> >Target version: nostalgy_0.2.32-1
> >Base
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze10_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1x6fcg-o2...@franck.debian.org
Hi,
On 2014-07-14 13:02, Debian Queue Viewer wrote:
Version in base suite: 0.2.31-1~deb7u1
Version in overlay suite: (not present)
Base version: nostalgy_0.2.31-1~deb7u1
Target version: nostalgy_0.2.32-1
Base file:
/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/n/nostalgy/nostalgy_0.2.31-1~deb7u1.dsc
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze10_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1x6dyc-sv...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze10_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze10_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze10_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze10_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Proc
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:43:59 +0200
with message-id <53c3a65f.2030...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#754779: nmu: pinba-engine-mysql_1.0.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #754779,
regarding nmu: pinba-engine-mysql_1.0.0-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 751953 + pending
Bug #751953 [release.debian.org] transition: upower
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
751953: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751953
Debia
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 06:17:19PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
> On 07/12/2014 05:20 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Thanks. Obviously it would be nice to trim down the patch stack
> > further, and I would like to ship 3.2 in jessie, but if you don't
> > mind I think I'll go ahead with what I have for
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're planning on uploading xserver 1.16 to unstable.
>
> Currently all drivers in main, except for xf86-video-glamo, build fine against
> the new xserver. xf86-video-glamo fails to build but has patches on the BTS.
>
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi!
nmu pinba-engine-mysql_1.0.0-4 . ALL . -m "Recompile against
mysql-server-core-5.5 5.5.37"
Same reason as before: MySQL doesn't provide
Processing changes file: base-files_6.0squeeze10_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1x6ayu-0007lx...@franck.debian.org
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #751953 [release.debian.org] transition: upower
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
751953: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751953
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 06/07/14 23:44, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello!
>
> A summary on the state of reverse dependencies of the upower
> has been requested before starting the transition.
Thanks for this. I have also done a little research and talked to maintainers of
the various DEs
On 14/07/14 09:05, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 01:27:37PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 13/07/14 13:04, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 11:45:16 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>
I have thought a bit more about this. I was hesitant as there
On 13/07/14 22:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 13/07/14 17:12, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> A binNMU needs to happen for the following source packages (I have
>> re-checked again this list using apt-rdepends -r, and it's still correct):
>>
>> - 0ad
>> - bitcoin
>> - eiskaltdcpp
>> - litecoin
>>
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 01:27:37PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 13/07/14 13:04, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 11:45:16 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >
> >> I have thought a bit more about this. I was hesitant as there are lots of
> >> packages involved, bu
53 matches
Mail list logo
