Re: Sources licensed under PHP License and not being PHP are not distributable

tags 752532 + wheezy-ignore tags 752533 + wheezy-ignore tags 752534 + wheezy-ignore tags 752535 + wheezy-ignore tags 752537 + wheezy-ignore tags 752614 + wheezy-ignore tags 752616 + wheezy-ignore tags 752618 + wheezy-ignore tags 752628 + wheezy-ignore tags 752629 + wheezy-ignore tags 752630 + wheez

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: base-files_7.1wheezy6_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux_3.2.60-1+deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux_3.2.60-1+deb7u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux_3.2.60-1+deb7u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes

Re: Sources licensed under PHP License and not being PHP are not distributable

Hi, On Sonntag, 6. Juli 2014, Julien Cristau wrote: > > while going through the list of (new) RC bugs claiming to affect wheezy, > > I noticed a whole bunch of "$foo is licensed under the PHP license and > > is not PHP" ones and am wondering if removal from stable is planned as > > well. > > Is it

Bug#753781: transition: xserver 1.16

Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2014-07-05): > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/xserver1.16.html > > We'd like to ship Jessie with xserver 1.16. It is

Re: Sources licensed under PHP License and not being PHP are not distributable

On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 17:01:37 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > while going through the list of (new) RC bugs claiming to affect wheezy, I > noticed a whole bunch of "$foo is licensed under the PHP license and is not > PHP" ones and am wondering if removal from stable is planned as well.

Re: Bug#753542: perl-base - Segfaults in libperl.so.5.18

On 05/07/14 21:33, Niko Tyni wrote: > (cc's dropped) > > On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 08:41:57PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 07:15:56PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >>> That said, feel free to upload perl now. >> >> Thanks, will do. > > Uploaded and accepted. It has

Re: Bug#753542: perl-base - Segfaults in libperl.so.5.18

On 05/07/14 21:33, Niko Tyni wrote: > (cc's dropped) > > On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 08:41:57PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 07:15:56PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >>> That said, feel free to upload perl now. >> >> Thanks, will do. > > Uploaded and accepted. It has

Re: dpkg-source unpack failures

On Sun, 2014-07-06 at 19:01 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 22:19:28 +0200, David Suárez wrote: > > El Lunes, 30 de junio de 2014 19:10:03 David Suárez escribió: > > > El Lunes, 30 de junio de 2014 04:29:43 Guillem Jover escribió: > > > > David, would it be possible to do a simp

Re: dpkg-source unpack failures

Hi! On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 22:19:28 +0200, David Suárez wrote: > El Lunes, 30 de junio de 2014 19:10:03 David Suárez escribió: > > El Lunes, 30 de junio de 2014 04:29:43 Guillem Jover escribió: > > > David, would it be possible to do a simple dpkg-source unpack run over > > > the stable archive, wi

Re: Sources licensed under PHP License and not being PHP are not distributable

Hi, while going through the list of (new) RC bugs claiming to affect wheezy, I noticed a whole bunch of "$foo is licensed under the PHP license and is not PHP" ones and am wondering if removal from stable is planned as well. Is it? cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a

Bug#673538: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui

At Sun, 06 Jul 2014 11:41:07 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 03-07-14 18:44, Yavor Doganov wrote: > >>> I'll ping you when the new core packages pass through NEW, OK? > >> > >> I don't see gnustep-gui 0.24 in NEW or in the archive. Was that ever > >> uploaded? How are things looking here? Release

Bug#750619: transition: wxsqlite3

On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 10:19:53PM +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: > > With guayadeque gone from testing because upstream is switching to qt, > > what's > > the situation here? Are the other two packages ready to switch? If

Processed: jessie

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 753767 + sid jessie Bug #753767 [ember] ember: not installable in sid Added tag(s) sid and jessie. > tags 753669 + sid jessie Bug #753669 [qemu-launcher] qemu-launcher: /usr/bin/qemu does not exist any more Added tag(s) sid and jessie. > tags

Processed: Re: Heads up: transition: xserver 1.16

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 751082 important Bug #751082 [src:nvidia-graphics-drivers] nvidia-graphics-drivers: Please package 337.25 in experimental as it should support Xorg 1.16. Severity set to 'important' from 'wishlist' > block 753781 by 751082 Bug #753781 [r

Bug#750619: transition: wxsqlite3

On 05/07/14 22:19, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> With guayadeque gone from testing because upstream is switching to qt, what's >> the situation here? Are the other two packages ready to switch? If so, shall >> we >> start thi

Processed: Re: Bug#751171: libglib2.0-cil: fails to configure on s390x

Processing control commands: > block 751525 by -1 Bug #751525 [release.debian.org] transition: poppler 0.26 751525 was blocked by: 751432 753575 751525 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 751525: 751171 -- 751171: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751171 751525: ht

Bug#753781: Nvidia driver should be updated before the transition

Current nvidia driver is not compatible with xorg 1.16. Probably version 331.79 should be packaged. See bu See following link for more details:

Bug#673538: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui

On 03-07-14 18:44, Yavor Doganov wrote: >>> I'll ping you when the new core packages pass through NEW, OK? >> >> I don't see gnustep-gui 0.24 in NEW or in the archive. Was that ever >> uploaded? How are things looking here? > > No, unfortunately nobody volunteered to sponsor them [2] yet... My >

Re: lua & jessie

On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 12:24:24AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > You could say the same for python 2.2 vs 2.7 (and everything before and > in between), yet we stopped shipping older versions after a while... Sure, but python is sold as a regular language. Lua's main market is as an extension lan