On 2014-06-10 00:37, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 10/06/14 00:24, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 10/06/14 00:10, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
>>> fcitx-qt5 can be binNMUed on all archs now.
>>
>> Scheduled.
>
> BTW I just saw this. Is there anything we need to do here?
>
On 10/06/14 00:24, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 10/06/14 00:10, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
>> fcitx-qt5 can be binNMUed on all archs now.
>
> Scheduled.
BTW I just saw this. Is there anything we need to do here?
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-qtdeclarative
On 10/06/14 00:05, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> gb ruby-yajl_1.2.0-2.dsc . armhf
> gb ruby-fftw3_0.4-6.dsc . armhf
Scheduled.
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 10/06/14 00:10, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> fcitx-qt5 can be binNMUed on all archs now.
Scheduled.
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists
On Monday, June 09, 2014 23:05:21 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 10:05 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > This is a small, low risk change cherry-picked from upstream that fixes a
> > significant issue reported by a Debian Wheezy user. We had intend
On Wednesday 04 June 2014 18:51:51 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-3-0.html Control:
> tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 31/05/14 22:20, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #750846 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package clamav/0.98.1+dfsg-1+deb7u3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
750846: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750846
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
-
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 10:05 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> This is a small, low risk change cherry-picked from upstream that fixes a
> significant issue reported by a Debian Wheezy user. We had intended to wait
> for the final 0.98.4 release and just fix this with th
Dear wanna-build team,
I've tried to reproduce the build failures on armhf of ruby-fftw3
and ruby-yajl, but couldn't see anything wrong on harris.d.o.
Please try a g-b for them:
gb ruby-yajl_1.2.0-2.dsc . armhf
gb ruby-fftw3_0.4-6.dsc . armhf
Thank you,
--
,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler
:
Hi,
On 09/06/14 15:20, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 05/28/2014 02:55 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 28/05/14 06:40, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> Note that I would like this transition to happen ASAP, because of #748913.
>>
>> That seems fixed in 1.6-4 now, so should be fine? We can wait until
On 09/06/14 19:46, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Hello release team,
>
> I am a new uploader of rtmidi and planing to upload rtmidi to "unstable".
>
> I want check with you that required rebuilds of stk and midisnoop do not
> collide with another transition.
If the rdeps build fine against the new rtmi
Hello release team,
I am a new uploader of rtmidi and planing to upload rtmidi to "unstable".
I want check with you that required rebuilds of stk and midisnoop do not
collide with another transition.
best regards
mira
Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:21:03PM -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > I've built test binaries from tag debian/1.4.17-3+deb7u1 and they are
> > available here:
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~edmonds/build/unbound/1.4.17-3+deb7u1/
> >
> > If this looks good to the release t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 747534 confirmed
Bug #747534 [release.debian.org] transition: libetpan
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
747534: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747534
D
On 09/06/14 15:44, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 02:38:47AM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
>> Hi Emilio,
>>
>> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 07:16:32PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
> […]
>>> Can you upload this to experimental so it can go through NEW?
>>
>>
On 05/28/2014 02:55 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 28/05/14 06:40, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Note that I would like this transition to happen ASAP, because of #748913.
>
> That seems fixed in 1.6-4 now, so should be fine? We can wait until that
> migrates.
Yes, I uploaded a patched versio
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 749880 by 750833
Bug #749880 [release.debian.org] transition: marble18okular4
749880 was blocked by: 750833
749880 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 749880: 750833
> block 748535 by 750833
Bug #748535 [release.debian.or
On 09-06-14 08:30, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> That way you are just wasting other peoples time, buildd time and so on.
> If such a policy prevents broken, packages with low quality and so on from
> being uploaded I am happy with it. And to just test some binarys, you don't
> have to be an expert.
In
18 matches
Mail list logo
