Hi,
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 09:56:07PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 747826 747711 750043
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:02:33PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > ngraph-gtk FTBFS on linux
> > obexftp FTBFS
> > subtle FTBFS
> >
> > Please open serious bugs for those
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 747609 with 746898
Bug #747609 [release.debian.org] transition: ruby2.0 removal
747609 was blocked by: 747826 747711 750043
747609 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 747609: 746898
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Control: block -1 by 747826 747711 750043
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:02:33PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 28/05/14 01:40, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:45:08AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> There are various build failures, see:
> >>
> >> https://b
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 747826 747711 750043
Bug #747609 [release.debian.org] transition: ruby2.0 removal
747609 was not blocked by any bugs.
747609 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 747609: 747826, 747711, and 750043
--
747609: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi Release Team! We are ready to go with the private stuff transition for
Qt 5.3.0.
The external (non Qt-stack) packages related are:
fcitx-qt5
gammaray
pyqt5
qtcreator (this last might
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 09:09:12PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> We would like to get a transition slot for eglibc 2.19. It is currently
> uploaded in experimental and has been built successfully on all
> architectures except armel and armhf. We have done manual builds on
> these architectures and
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear release team,
We would like to get a transition slot for eglibc 2.19. It is currently
uploaded in experimental and has been built successfully on all
architectures except armel and
On 30/05/14 13:18, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to request a transition slot for marble18 and okular4, which are the
> remaining parts of the kde4.13 release tha
Your message dated Sat, 31 May 2014 19:42:08 +0200
with message-id <538a1470.8040...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#746241: transition: enet
has caused the Debian Bug report #746241,
regarding transition: enet
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/analitza5abi1.html
On 31/05/14 13:27, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 transition: analitza5abi1
>
> ¡Hola Emilio!
>
> El 2014-05-24 a las 18:06 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort escribió:
>>>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #748738 [release.debian.org] transition: analitza5abi1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/analitza5abi1.html
Bug #748738 [release.debian.org] transition: analitza5abi1
Set Bug forwarded-to-address
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 747923 with 750013
Bug #747923 [release.debian.org] transition: colord
747923 was blocked by: 749221 749975
747923 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 747923: 750013
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 747923 with 749975
Bug #747923 [release.debian.org] transition: colord
747923 was blocked by: 749221
747923 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 747923: 749975
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On 31/05/14 18:40, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
IMVHO -release@ doesn't need to know about what happens to every single
package. Feel free to keep that kind of Q & A between maintainers and
porters.
I was under the impression that -release was overseeing the QA requirements
for Jessie are being satis
On 31/05/14 18:22, Pino Toscano wrote:
Attached a first version of patch for it; the changes to control.in
and rules should be fine, while most probably the .install files
could need few tricks (since gnome-terminal-search-provider.ini is
not installed). GNOME team: if you could help on this, tha
Robert Millan (2014-05-31):
> I find it very strange that a terminal application needs gnome-shell. There
> are
> dozens of terminal applications, and so far they seem to manage without
> dragging
> their own desktop environment of choice with them.
>
> Which makes me wonder: Does gnome-termina
tag 749888 + patch
thanks
Hi,
On 2014-05-31 15:43, Robert Millan wrote:
Which makes me wonder: Does gnome-terminal actually work without
gnome-shell?
It seems (just looking at the sources, I'm not a GNOME guy)
gnome-shell is needed to integrate gnome-terminal as search provider
for gnome-shel
Hello Robert Millan!
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 03:43:18PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I find it very strange that a terminal application needs gnome-shell.
[...]
Maybe you should try to spend 2 seconds on trying to figure it out
(ie. by searching the package changelog) before posting
Please accept my apologies. Apparently my previous mail wasn't clear enough for
everyone. So please allow me to ellaborate: The text had a statement and some
questions. One can tell them appart because questions end with a '?' sign, and
statements don't. The questions are what I'd really like to
On 31/05/14 17:51, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
Maybe you should try to spend 2 seconds on trying to figure it out
(ie. by searching the package changelog) before posting in the future.
Why?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
On 15:43, Robert Millan wrote:
> I find it very strange that a terminal application needs gnome-shell.
Stranger still that it is a *build* dependency; here's what happens
without it:
> checking whether to build the gnome-shell search provider... yes
> checking for
> /usr/share/dbus-1/interfaces
On 15:16, Robert Millan wrote:
> Indeed. Unless something has changed, only broken (linux-)i386 dependencies
> prevent migration.
Um, a binary package on any release arch stalls migration, I think. Did
you say that based on the Britney excuses output as shown on the PTS?
Britney tests installabi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear release team,
Upstream for MLMMJ has released a bugfix version correcting
a few bugs, one of which is the loss of some emails in some
cases, which is IMO bad enough to deserve a correction
Hi,
I find it very strange that a terminal application needs gnome-shell. There are
dozens of terminal applications, and so far they seem to manage without dragging
their own desktop environment of choice with them.
Which makes me wonder: Does gnome-terminal actually work without gnome-shell? I
On 31/05/14 00:42, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 30/05/14 17:57, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Hi Emilio,
On 16:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Just a reminder: there are still various things depending on the removed
packages, preventing things from migrating to testing.
Do you agree it's j
On 30/05/14 18:32, Jérôme Vouillon wrote:
Hi,
On 30/05/2014 17:57, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 16:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Just a reminder: there are still various things depending on the removed
packages, preventing things from migrating to testing.
Do you agree it's just the two
Processing control commands:
> block 748169 by -1
Bug #748169 [release.debian.org] transition: wxwidgets3.0
748169 was blocked by: 749844 749974 741580 741732 741988 749463 742576 749843
738849 749487 743334 742031 749834 729677 748634 746609 748715 749835 749659
744115 749687 749140 741391 7499
Control: retitle -1 transition: analitza5abi1
¡Hola Emilio!
El 2014-05-24 a las 18:06 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort escribió:
> > This is a small and self contained transition, libanalitza broke it's ABI
> > interface so we are bumping the soversion to 5ab1. The only affected
> > packages
> > ar
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 transition: analitza5abi1
Bug #748738 [release.debian.org] transition: analitza5ab1
Changed Bug title to 'transition: analitza5abi1' from 'transition: analitza5ab1'
--
748738: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748738
Debian Bug Tracking Sy
Processing control commands:
> block 748169 by -1
Bug #748169 [release.debian.org] transition: wxwidgets3.0
748169 was blocked by: 749844 749974 741580 741732 741988 749463 742576 749843
738849 749487 743334 742031 749834 729677 748634 746609 748715 749835 749659
744115 749687 749140 741391 7499
Processing control commands:
> block 748169 by -1
Bug #748169 [release.debian.org] transition: wxwidgets3.0
748169 was blocked by: 749844 749974 741580 741732 741988 749463 742576 749843
738849 749487 743334 742031 749834 729677 748634 746609 748715 749835 749659
744115 749687 749140 741391 7410
Processing control commands:
> block 748169 by -1
Bug #748169 [release.debian.org] transition: wxwidgets3.0
748169 was blocked by: 748715 749835 749659 744115 749687 749844 749140 741580
741988 741732 741391 742576 749463 749843 738849 741072 749487 748085 743334
749861 749454 749493 748639 7498
On 31/05/14 01:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Scheduled level 1, with a dep-wait for mips and sparc.
>
> Note that libkolab FTBFS, so I didn't schedule that one. See #747808.
So far these are failing:
libkolab, as said earlier,
php-apcu
xcache
Can you take a look?
Regards,
Emilio
--
To
33 matches
Mail list logo
